• Re: An embryo is not a "baby" or a "child"

    From interzone@21:1/5 to Rudy Canoza on Sat Jul 9 10:28:32 2022
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.misc

    On 7/2/2022 12:55 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
    Abortion is safer than childbirth.

    And golfing is more dangerous than badminton.

    An equally laughable non sequitur, fool.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 25B.Z959@21:1/5 to interzone on Sun Jul 10 01:39:45 2022
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.misc

    On 7/9/22 12:28 PM, interzone wrote:
    On 7/2/2022 12:55 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
    Abortion is safer than childbirth.

    And golfing is more dangerous than badminton.

    An equally laughable non sequitur, fool.

    Correct.

    Though I'm afraid abortions don't really fit any
    convenient categories. Neither science or math
    or religions will deliver a definitive answer.
    This is one of those ultra-subjective "human
    issues" ... we kinda make it up as we go along.

    Is abortion a "right" ? Does a month-old embryo
    count as "human" - and thus have "rights" ? NO
    ANSWERS really.

    In the USA, abortion is not exactly a legal "right".
    Everybody knew "Roe" was based on VERY shakey legal
    logic and WOULD be dumped at some point.

    Now SHOULD it be TREATED a lot like a "right" ?
    IMHO, yes. I also tend to agree with those who
    say "No Womb - No Opinion". Far too easy to get
    preggers - either by negligence or crime - and
    nobody should be condemned to childbirthing.

    LIMITS ? Also yes. For SURE once into the 3rd tri
    you've got a fairly well-developed, perfectly viable,
    well-wired "human". BEFORE that, sorry, not wired
    well-enough IMHO to call "human" with any conviction.

    So ... the US govt SHOULD (and should HAVE) codified
    a certain range of abortion legality LONG ago. Indeed
    EVERY right explicitly mentioned in the constitution
    should have had the same extra layer of protection.

    But abortion (and some right-wing issues) did NOT get
    codified - even when the opportunities existed. WHY ?

    Well, the USUAL. "Threats" = CAMPAIGN DONATIONS and
    VOTES. Do away with such threats and there's NO MONEY
    in them anymore.

    When in question, when in doubt, follow the MONEY
    and you'll find out.
    - me, so far as I know, like 30 years back

    In any case, I think the SANE mission NOW is to
    push out the EXTREMISTS - left/right/whatever.
    They never have OUR best interests at heart ;
    only their own power and glory. Extremists always
    seek to cause chaos, ROLL THE DICE, in hopes they
    can take advantage to gain Ultimate Power.

    You really Really REALLY don't WANT them to have
    anything approaching Ultimate Power .........

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)