Jolly Roger <
[email protected]> wrote
I really don't. You saw Arlen's immediate response, and no doubt his
little gang-of-trolls minions are watching and learning from it.
Hi Jolly Roger,
This is an adult conversation, so likely you won't understand a word of it.
You posted something nobody on the Android newsgroup cares about, since we already knew about it and didn't feel any need to inform anyone of nothing.
What _I_ responded to was the obvious desperation that you have to "taunt" given that you "feel" superior that Apple succeeded and Qualcomm failed.
I'll agree with you that Apple succeeded with this silly marketing gimmick. Qualcomm failed.
Arlen claims the troll gang "doesn't care" about failures like this, but
they regularly care when they find something Apple does that they can
gloat about, like this recent thread started by "Wally".
I've always said you provide value to me, Jolly Roger, because you don't
have the capacity to lie like nospam does, nor are you like Alan Browne.
You provide value to me because I learn deeply about how you people think.
You posted that article to "taunt" us which is why it's interesting you
did.
We knew all about it, Jolly Roger. And we didn't care.
It's just a marketing gimmick, Jolly Roger.
Like glass backs, titanium frames, and "**YELLOW*!!!!!!!!!!!" iPhones!
But what _I_ care about is understanding how your strange mind works.
The taunt shows me how insecure you feel about Apple's design incompetence.
POLL: What do you predict Apple will do now that their iPhone 15 design incompetence is at the fore? <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/C7fNdxLAfc8>
So, no. There's no need to cross-post since the Apple-hating troll gang
is right here in the Apple news groups. And I couldn't give less of a
shit what advocacy or Android groups think about it. Anyone who
cross-posts to Android and advocacy groups can sit their ass on a pole
and spin for all I care. They only attract more trolls and disruption by doing so.
It's obvious that Apple is incompetent at chip design from the billions
poured into 5G modem designs to the unpatchable holes in the secure enclave
and CPU SOCs to the failed Apple GPU SOC, and to recent iPhone 15 flaws.
If your claim is that Qualcomm is similarly incompetent, which is the claim you're _clearly_ so desperate to make, then why is it well ahead of Apple?
In the Apple case, in order to "prime the pump" that heavy tab is being
picked up by Apple in the first couple years. I expect Apple will be
adding a fee structure of some kind at some point for those who expect
to be in situations where such comms might be a life saver.
Speaking of which, Apple just announced they are extending Emergency SOS
via satellite another year, which should *really* chap the troll gang's
asses - you love to see it:
Apple extends Emergency SOS via satellite for an additional free year
for existing iPhone 14 users
<https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2023/11/apple-extends-emergency-sos-via-satellite-for-an-additional-free-year/>
Jolly Roger,
You are incapable of understanding a mere marketing gimmick, perhaps due to
the fact you have never taken even a single marketing class on the subject.
It's a gimmick, Jolly Roger. A meaningless gimmick just like the YELLOW!
iPhone is a meaningless gimmick. Just as FaceID is a meaningless gimmick.
Apple preys on people who are scared to death.
This is a _perfect_ gimmick for the typical Apple consumer, Jolly Roger.
An Android consumer, by definition, doesn't fall prey to the predatory marketing that Apple spends more than they spend on R&D promoting to us.
--
Apple's fundamental marketing strategy is to prey upon frightened people
(which wouldn't be so bad if Apple actually provided a safer solution).
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)