1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. MISC.NEWS.INTERNET.DISCUS

  • AI poetry

    From Retrograde@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 18 02:17:54 2024
    From the «fer fuck's sake, William» department:
    Title: AI poetry out-humans humans as readers prefer bots to bards
    Author: Lindsay Clark
    Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 09:41:10 +0000
    Link: https://go.theregister.com/feed/www.theregister.com/2024/11/17/ai_poetry_study/

    Uncultured swine prone to believe complexity of verse is machine-generated babble

    A study in the US has found that readers can't tell the difference between poems written by famous poets and those written by AI aping their style. To make matters worse – for anyone fostering a love of literature at least – research subjects tend to like AI poetry more than they do verse from human poets.…

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Trew@21:1/5 to Retrograde on Mon Nov 18 09:01:36 2024
    On 11/17/2024 9:17 PM, Retrograde wrote:
    From the «fer fuck's sake, William» department:
    Title: AI poetry out-humans humans as readers prefer bots to bards
    Author: Lindsay Clark
    Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 09:41:10 +0000
    Link: https://go.theregister.com/feed/www.theregister.com/2024/11/17/ai_poetry_study/

    Uncultured swine prone to believe complexity of verse is machine-generated babble

    A study in the US has found that readers can't tell the difference between poems written by famous poets and those written by AI aping their style. To make matters worse – for anyone fostering a love of literature at least – research subjects tend to like AI poetry more than they do verse from human poets.…

    That's bizarre. I can usually spot AI from a mile away. Things
    "written" by AI are very repetitive and vague, generally.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)