• HOA Violation Question

    From Rick@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 15 13:42:08 2025
    This situation currently faces an acquaintance of mine in Florida.

    Homeowner in Orange County, Florida decides to sell their house. They
    have a realtor and a willing buyer, but have not yet written a sale
    contract. It is everyone's expectation that a sale can be completed
    relatively quickly. But before the sale can be made, the homeowner
    receives a violation notice from the HOA that their Bahia lawn has many
    barren spots and needs to be restored. The violation quotes a
    requirement in the Covenants stating that lawns need to be neat and
    orderly and free of barren or bare patches. They are given 30 days to
    correct the violation, which is the standard HOA policy. If the
    homeowner fails to respond or take action after 30 days, a second notice
    is sent out and after no response or action in another 30days, the HOA
    turns the matter over to their lawyers and the homeowner is assessed
    legal fees. At some point in the process a lien is potentially filed
    against the property, but that does not happen instantly.

    Assuming the potential buyer knows of the barren spots and wants to buy
    the house anyway, what happens if the homeowner ignores the notice and
    proceeds with the sale? Can the homeowner successfully sell the house
    with the violation effectively becoming the problem of the new owner?
    Or does something happen during the title certification process where
    the violation is caught and becomes a factor? Is it standard practice
    in such situations that the violation notice is incorporated into the
    sales contract and the new owner agrees to assume the violation?

    Alternatively, if the owner responds to the violation by contracting
    with a lawn company to reseed the lawn, but the lawn company states that because it is a Bahia seed lawn and not sod, it will take several months
    for the lawn to grown back, will that satisfy the HOA to close out the violation and allow the sale to proceed. I'm interested in
    understanding both the legal aspects of this situation as well as common practice in Florida.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stan Brown@21:1/5 to Rick on Mon Jun 16 06:23:31 2025
    On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 13:42:08 -0700 (PDT), Rick wrote:

    This situation currently faces an acquaintance of mine in Florida.

    Homeowner in Orange County, Florida decides to sell their house. They
    have a realtor and a willing buyer, but have not yet written a sale
    contract. It is everyone's expectation that a sale can be completed relatively quickly. But before the sale can be made, the homeowner
    receives a violation notice from the HOA that their Bahia lawn has many barren spots and needs to be restored. The violation quotes a
    requirement in the Covenants stating that lawns need to be neat and
    orderly and free of barren or bare patches. They are given 30 days to correct the violation, which is the standard HOA policy. If the
    homeowner fails to respond or take action after 30 days, a second notice
    is sent out and after no response or action in another 30days, the HOA
    turns the matter over to their lawyers and the homeowner is assessed
    legal fees. At some point in the process a lien is potentially filed
    against the property, but that does not happen instantly.

    Assuming the potential buyer knows of the barren spots and wants to buy
    the house anyway, what happens if the homeowner ignores the notice and proceeds with the sale? Can the homeowner successfully sell the house
    with the violation effectively becoming the problem of the new owner?
    Or does something happen during the title certification process where
    the violation is caught and becomes a factor? Is it standard practice
    in such situations that the violation notice is incorporated into the
    sales contract and the new owner agrees to assume the violation?

    Alternatively, if the owner responds to the violation by contracting
    with a lawn company to reseed the lawn, but the lawn company states that because it is a Bahia seed lawn and not sod, it will take several months
    for the lawn to grown back, will that satisfy the HOA to close out the violation and allow the sale to proceed. I'm interested in
    understanding both the legal aspects of this situation as well as common practice in Florida.

    I understand why you posted here. But IMHO this is an area where the
    law is less important than real estate industry practice.

    These are good questions for the seller to ask their realtor(*). As
    I've learned from two recent homebuying experiences, when it comes to
    defects the law is one thing but common practice may be something
    else. For instance, at least in New York State and California, the
    buyer does not face any penalty for backing out of the sale, no
    matter how frivolous their reason. The escrow company will give them
    back their deposit, because it's common practice, even if their offer
    stated otherwise (as it probably is, because that's the standard
    realtor[*] form).

    HOAs vary widely in their fussiness. The logical thing to do, if it
    will take as long as you say for the lawn to grow back, is let the
    HOA and the buyers know that you've hired N. N. to reseed the lawn
    but it will take X weeks to grow back. But what is logical to you or
    me is not necessarily logical to a realtor.(*) If the seller's
    realtor(*) is a good one, he or she will have advice on how to make
    sure this doesn't derail the sale.

    A good realtor(*) will also have a list of contractors with various
    areas of expertise who will work more quickly than usual in order to
    maintain their relationships with that realtor, who is a fruitful
    source of referrals. A smart homeowner will ask their realtor(*) for recommendations rather than just looking in the phone book in an area
    where they don't know anybody yet.

    (*) Yes, I know realtors always capitalize the R to protect the
    trademark. They're free to do so, but that doesn't bind us ordinary
    mortals. I would not capitalize the m in mechanic, the b in butcher,
    the d in doctor, or the l in lawyer; why should realtors wear a
    crown?

    --
    After using my real address in 37 years of Usenet articles,
    I am now reluctantly posting a fake address because of the
    large number of sites scraping Usenet articles without
    permission and putting them on their own pretend forum sites.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Levine@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon Jun 16 13:05:24 2025
    It appears that Stan Brown <[email protected]> said:
    (*) Yes, I know realtors always capitalize the R to protect the
    trademark. They're free to do so, but that doesn't bind us ordinary
    mortals.

    FWIW, a realtor is someone who belongs to the National Association of Realtors. It is
    quite possible to be licensed as an agent or broker without joining the NAR.

    We can leave for a separate discussion whether NAR membership provides useful value to
    customers, sort of like whether a Kleenex kleenex is better than a store brand kleenex.

    --
    Regards,
    John Levine, [email protected], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
    Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mike Anderson@21:1/5 to Stan Brown on Wed Jun 18 16:09:09 2025
    On 6/16/2025 9:23 AM, Stan Brown wrote:
    On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 13:42:08 -0700 (PDT), Rick wrote:

    This situation currently faces an acquaintance of mine in Florida.

    Homeowner in Orange County, Florida decides to sell their house. They
    have a realtor and a willing buyer, but have not yet written a sale
    contract. It is everyone's expectation that a sale can be completed
    relatively quickly. But before the sale can be made, the homeowner
    receives a violation notice from the HOA that their Bahia lawn has many
    barren spots and needs to be restored. The violation quotes a
    requirement in the Covenants stating that lawns need to be neat and
    orderly and free of barren or bare patches. They are given 30 days to
    correct the violation, which is the standard HOA policy. If the
    homeowner fails to respond or take action after 30 days, a second notice
    is sent out and after no response or action in another 30days, the HOA
    turns the matter over to their lawyers and the homeowner is assessed
    legal fees. At some point in the process a lien is potentially filed
    against the property, but that does not happen instantly.

    Assuming the potential buyer knows of the barren spots and wants to buy
    the house anyway, what happens if the homeowner ignores the notice and
    proceeds with the sale? Can the homeowner successfully sell the house
    with the violation effectively becoming the problem of the new owner?
    Or does something happen during the title certification process where
    the violation is caught and becomes a factor? Is it standard practice
    in such situations that the violation notice is incorporated into the
    sales contract and the new owner agrees to assume the violation?

    Alternatively, if the owner responds to the violation by contracting
    with a lawn company to reseed the lawn, but the lawn company states that
    because it is a Bahia seed lawn and not sod, it will take several months
    for the lawn to grown back, will that satisfy the HOA to close out the
    violation and allow the sale to proceed. I'm interested in
    understanding both the legal aspects of this situation as well as common
    practice in Florida.

    I understand why you posted here. But IMHO this is an area where the
    law is less important than real estate industry practice.

    These are good questions for the seller to ask their realtor(*). As
    I've learned from two recent homebuying experiences, when it comes to
    defects the law is one thing but common practice may be something
    else. For instance, at least in New York State and California, the
    buyer does not face any penalty for backing out of the sale, no
    matter how frivolous their reason. The escrow company will give them
    back their deposit, because it's common practice, even if their offer
    stated otherwise (as it probably is, because that's the standard
    realtor[*] form).

    HOAs vary widely in their fussiness. The logical thing to do, if it
    will take as long as you say for the lawn to grow back, is let the
    HOA and the buyers know that you've hired N. N. to reseed the lawn
    but it will take X weeks to grow back. But what is logical to you or
    me is not necessarily logical to a realtor.(*) If the seller's
    realtor(*) is a good one, he or she will have advice on how to make
    sure this doesn't derail the sale.

    A good realtor(*) will also have a list of contractors with various
    areas of expertise who will work more quickly than usual in order to maintain their relationships with that realtor, who is a fruitful
    source of referrals. A smart homeowner will ask their realtor(*) for recommendations rather than just looking in the phone book in an area
    where they don't know anybody yet.

    (*) Yes, I know realtors always capitalize the R to protect the
    trademark. They're free to do so, but that doesn't bind us ordinary
    mortals. I would not capitalize the m in mechanic, the b in butcher,
    the d in doctor, or the l in lawyer; why should realtors wear a
    crown?


    Realtors are real estate agents but not all real estate agents are
    realtors. Realtors are members of the National Association of REALTORS®
    (NAR).

    "John Doe, Realtor" is is much like "Jane Q Public, Esquire" or "John
    Brown, Medical Doctor." If used to refer to a specific person, it's
    generally capitalized ("The President gave a speech") but if used
    generically, it's not ("A president has specific powers.") Om this
    regard, I would agree it was proper to have said "...a realtor.(*) If
    the seller's realtor(*)..." but if you'd said, "Ask the Realtor.", then
    that should be capitalized.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Barry Gold@21:1/5 to Stan Brown on Mon Jun 23 22:07:24 2025
    On 6/16/2025 6:23 AM, Stan Brown wrote:
    (*) Yes, I know realtors always capitalize the R to protect the
    trademark. They're free to do so, but that doesn't bind us ordinary
    mortals. I would not capitalize the m in mechanic, the b in butcher,
    the d in doctor, or the l in lawyer; why should realtors wear a
    crown?

    The way you protect a trademark is to put TM (if unregistered) or
    circle-R (if registered) after the mark. You'd think an outfit as big as
    the National Association of Realtors would know better.
    --
    I do so have a memory. It's backed up on DVD... somewhere...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Levine@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 24 12:51:06 2025
    According to Barry Gold <[email protected]>:
    The way you protect a trademark is to put TM (if unregistered) or
    circle-R (if registered) after the mark. You'd think an outfit as big as
    the National Association of Realtors would know better.

    Actually, the way you protect a trademark is to act like the trademark is valuable, which often involves sending more or less polite lawyer letters to people who use your trademark in a generic way. The R in a circle is just a hint. Capitalizing your trademark is a standard practice, so, you know, you can tell a Kleenex kleenex from an ordinary kleenex.

    Fun fact: cellophane, escalator, trampoline, zipper, and heroin used to be trademarks but are now generic.

    --
    Regards,
    John Levine, [email protected], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
    Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rick@21:1/5 to John Levine on Tue Jun 24 23:13:56 2025
    On 6/24/2025 3:51 PM, John Levine wrote:
    According to Barry Gold <[email protected]>:
    The way you protect a trademark is to put TM (if unregistered) or
    circle-R (if registered) after the mark. You'd think an outfit as big as
    the National Association of Realtors would know better.

    Actually, the way you protect a trademark is to act like the trademark is valuable, which often involves sending more or less polite lawyer letters to people who use your trademark in a generic way. The R in a circle is just a hint. Capitalizing your trademark is a standard practice, so, you know, you can
    tell a Kleenex kleenex from an ordinary kleenex.

    Fun fact: cellophane, escalator, trampoline, zipper, and heroin used to be trademarks but are now generic.


    Ditto Band Aid, Aspirin, Videotape, Thermos, Teleprompter, Laundromat,
    Dry Ice, Kerosene, and numerous others including, of all things, Flip Phone

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Barry Gold@21:1/5 to Rick on Thu Jun 26 05:32:14 2025
    On 6/24/2025 11:13 PM, Rick wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 3:51 PM, John Levine wrote:
    According to Barry Gold  <[email protected]>:
    The way you protect a trademark is to put TM (if unregistered) or
    circle-R (if registered) after the mark. You'd think an outfit as big as >>> the National Association of Realtors would know better.

    Actually, the way you protect a trademark is to act like the trademark is
    valuable, which often involves sending more or less polite lawyer
    letters to
    people who use your trademark in a generic way. The R in a circle is
    just a
    hint. Capitalizing your trademark is a standard practice, so, you
    know, you can
    tell a Kleenex kleenex from an ordinary kleenex.

    Fun fact: cellophane, escalator, trampoline, zipper, and heroin used
    to be
    trademarks but are now generic.


    Ditto Band Aid, Aspirin, Videotape, Thermos, Teleprompter, Laundromat,
    Dry Ice, Kerosene, and numerous others including, of all things, Flip Phone


    AFAIK Band Aid is still a trademark. I call your attention to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Band-Aid#/media/File:BandAid.jpg
    Notice the circle-R next to "Band-Aid"

    Now... without the hyphen it might be generic. Not sure about that. But
    I'm pretty sure I haven't seen anybody else selling adhesive bandages
    under that name.
    --
    I do so have a memory. It's backed up on DVD... somewhere...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rick@21:1/5 to Barry Gold on Thu Jun 26 08:16:56 2025
    On 6/26/2025 8:32 AM, Barry Gold wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 11:13 PM, Rick wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 3:51 PM, John Levine wrote:
    According to Barry Gold  <[email protected]>:
    The way you protect a trademark is to put TM (if unregistered) or
    circle-R (if registered) after the mark. You'd think an outfit as
    big as
    the National Association of Realtors would know better.

    Actually, the way you protect a trademark is to act like the
    trademark is
    valuable, which often involves sending more or less polite lawyer
    letters to
    people who use your trademark in a generic way. The R in a circle is
    just a
    hint. Capitalizing your trademark is a standard practice, so, you
    know, you can
    tell a Kleenex kleenex from an ordinary kleenex.

    Fun fact: cellophane, escalator, trampoline, zipper, and heroin used
    to be
    trademarks but are now generic.


    Ditto Band Aid, Aspirin, Videotape, Thermos, Teleprompter, Laundromat,
    Dry Ice, Kerosene, and numerous others including, of all things, Flip
    Phone


    AFAIK Band Aid is still a trademark. I call your attention to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Band-Aid#/media/File:BandAid.jpg
    Notice the circle-R next to "Band-Aid"

    Now... without the hyphen it might be generic. Not sure about that. But
    I'm pretty sure I haven't seen anybody else selling adhesive bandages
    under that name.

    I think you're right about that. But the word without caps has
    certainly fallen into general use. Can't remember the last time someone
    asked me for an "adhesive bandage strip" for their cut finger.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Levine@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 17 21:52:49 2025
    According to Rick <[email protected]>:
    Actually, the way you protect a trademark is to act like the trademark is
    valuable, which often involves sending more or less polite lawyer letters to >> people who use your trademark in a generic way. The R in a circle is just a >> hint. Capitalizing your trademark is a standard practice, so, you know, you can
    tell a Kleenex kleenex from an ordinary kleenex.

    Fun fact: cellophane, escalator, trampoline, zipper, and heroin used to be >> trademarks but are now generic.

    Ditto Band Aid, Aspirin, Videotape, Thermos, Teleprompter, Laundromat,
    Dry Ice, Kerosene, and numerous others including, of all things, Flip Phone

    Band Aid is still a trademark. Aspirin and Heroin are a special case, confiscated
    from Bayer as enemy property after WW I.

    Realtor is at some risk of becoming generic, so they make videos like this:

    https://www.nar.realtor/videos/make-our-marks-remarkable

    --
    Regards,
    John Levine, [email protected], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
    Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)