• Am I liable? Will I have to pay?

    From micky@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 6 08:39:45 2025
    Could I be found liable under the following circumstances?
    Would I be covered by our Directors and Officers insurance if I am
    neither a director nor an officer? In Maryland.

    I live in a townhouse community of slightly over 100 houses. We are on
    not a steep but a clear hill, sufficient to make cars slide when streets
    are icy. It's the policy and practice of the HOA to hire a firm to
    plow our streets when it snows, and to salt the streets then and when a
    layer of ice is expected. (like last night)

    Because we are short of money (because the documents have made it so
    hard to raise the dues (and for other reasons), and because the
    plowing/salting company has come out and billed us (of course) even when
    no snow or ice occurred, we made a rule with them that they need our
    Okay each time. I am the contact person and by default the decider if
    they should come or not.

    If I say they should not come but I'm wrong and there is in fact an ice
    "storm" or snow and the next morning when people leave for work, a car
    slides and collides with another car, could I be liable for the damages, because the driver(s) relied on the HOA to take precautions against the
    ice?

    If the HOA and I are liable, would I be covered by the Directors and
    Officers insurance, even though I have no title, I'm no longer on the
    Board, and I don't think I'm an officer.

    We have a couple of the insurance documents, for our Erie Insurance
    Exchange General Liability Policy, on our management company's webpage,
    but they are only a summary, no details, no text (and even that can't be selected or copied) so please take your best guess whether I'm the de
    facto Snow Removal Officer, and that means the insurance covers me. Or
    am I a nobody? Should I have the Board formally name me the Snow
    Removal Officer?

    There is generally no limit to the number, titles, or names of officers,
    is there, as long as they each have a legitimate role in the operation
    of the HOA? For example, we could also have a Doggy Refuse Bag
    Dispenser Officer, even though I don't see how anything that person
    could do or not do could cause damages over a few dollars.

    --
    I think you can tell, but just to be sure:
    I am not a lawyer.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stuart O. Bronstein@21:1/5 to micky on Thu Feb 6 12:24:49 2025
    Sorry to top post, but it's appropriate in this instance.

    Your question can't be answered with the information given. First, is
    the road a public or private road? If it's a private road, then yes, you
    could be responsible if it's determined that your actions were negligent
    and the person who was injured had a right to be there at that time.

    It is unlikely you are covered by D & O insurance if you are neither a
    director or officer. But it's impossible to know without reading the
    policy. You should talk to your carrier about that, and ask how they
    recommend you handle the situation.

    micky <[email protected]> wrote:

    Could I be found liable under the following circumstances?
    Would I be covered by our Directors and Officers insurance if I am
    neither a director nor an officer? In Maryland.

    I live in a townhouse community of slightly over 100 houses. We are on
    not a steep but a clear hill, sufficient to make cars slide when
    streets
    are icy. It's the policy and practice of the HOA to hire a firm to
    plow our streets when it snows, and to salt the streets then and when a
    layer of ice is expected. (like last night)

    Because we are short of money (because the documents have made it so
    hard to raise the dues (and for other reasons), and because the plowing/salting company has come out and billed us (of course) even
    when
    no snow or ice occurred, we made a rule with them that they need our
    Okay each time. I am the contact person and by default the decider if
    they should come or not.

    If I say they should not come but I'm wrong and there is in fact an ice "storm" or snow and the next morning when people leave for work, a car
    slides and collides with another car, could I be liable for the
    damages,
    because the driver(s) relied on the HOA to take precautions against the
    ice?

    If the HOA and I are liable, would I be covered by the Directors and
    Officers insurance, even though I have no title, I'm no longer on the
    Board, and I don't think I'm an officer.

    We have a couple of the insurance documents, for our Erie Insurance
    Exchange General Liability Policy, on our management company's webpage,
    but they are only a summary, no details, no text (and even that can't
    be
    selected or copied) so please take your best guess whether I'm the de
    facto Snow Removal Officer, and that means the insurance covers me. Or
    am I a nobody? Should I have the Board formally name me the Snow
    Removal Officer?

    There is generally no limit to the number, titles, or names of
    officers,
    is there, as long as they each have a legitimate role in the operation
    of the HOA? For example, we could also have a Doggy Refuse Bag
    Dispenser Officer, even though I don't see how anything that person
    could do or not do could cause damages over a few dollars.




    --
    Stu
    http://DownToEarthLawyer.com


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Barry Gold@21:1/5 to micky on Thu Feb 6 22:04:39 2025
    On 2/6/2025 8:39 AM, micky wrote:
    Could I be found liable under the following circumstances?
    Would I be covered by our Directors and Officers insurance if I am
    neither a director nor an officer? In Maryland.

    I live in a townhouse community of slightly over 100 houses. We are on
    not a steep but a clear hill, sufficient to make cars slide when streets
    are icy. It's the policy and practice of the HOA to hire a firm to
    plow our streets when it snows, and to salt the streets then and when a
    layer of ice is expected. (like last night)

    Because we are short of money (because the documents have made it so
    hard to raise the dues (and for other reasons), and because the plowing/salting company has come out and billed us (of course) even when
    no snow or ice occurred, we made a rule with them that they need our
    Okay each time. I am the contact person and by default the decider if
    they should come or not.

    If I say they should not come but I'm wrong and there is in fact an ice "storm" or snow and the next morning when people leave for work, a car
    slides and collides with another car, could I be liable for the damages, because the driver(s) relied on the HOA to take precautions against the
    ice?

    If the HOA and I are liable, would I be covered by the Directors and
    Officers insurance, even though I have no title, I'm no longer on the
    Board, and I don't think I'm an officer.

    We have a couple of the insurance documents, for our Erie Insurance
    Exchange General Liability Policy, on our management company's webpage,
    but they are only a summary, no details, no text (and even that can't be selected or copied) so please take your best guess whether I'm the de
    facto Snow Removal Officer, and that means the insurance covers me. Or
    am I a nobody? Should I have the Board formally name me the Snow
    Removal Officer?

    There is generally no limit to the number, titles, or names of officers,
    is there, as long as they each have a legitimate role in the operation
    of the HOA? For example, we could also have a Doggy Refuse Bag
    Dispenser Officer, even though I don't see how anything that person
    could do or not do could cause damages over a few dollars.

    Even though you are not a director or officer, you are acting as agent
    for the HoA. So the general rule of respondeat superior or “let the
    master answer” applies.

    Note that if you acted negligently, the HoA - or the insurance company -
    could sue to recover what they paid out. But if you have homeowners
    insurance, that should cover up to the limit of the policy.



    --
    I do so have a memory. It's backed up on DVD... somewhere...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From micky@21:1/5 to Stuart O. Bronstein on Thu Feb 6 22:03:36 2025
    In misc.legal.moderated, on Thu, 6 Feb 2025 12:24:49 -0800 (PST),
    "Stuart O. Bronstein" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Sorry to top post, but it's appropriate in this instance.

    Your question can't be answered with the information given. First, is
    the road a public or private road? If it's a private road, then yes, you

    Yes, we do own the streets. We tried to give them to the county but
    they won't take them. :-)

    could be responsible if it's determined that your actions were negligent
    and the person who was injured had a right to be there at that time.

    It is unlikely you are covered by D & O insurance if you are neither a >director or officer. But it's impossible to know without reading the
    policy. You should talk to your carrier about that, and ask how they >recommend you handle the situation.

    Thank you for your clear speedy answer. I've written to the president
    and to the lawn-and-snow chair (who is a board member) and told them I
    can't be the contact until we resolve it. Snow and icy rain are
    predicted for Saturday. Tomorrow I will make very sure the snow-plow
    people know I'm not the contact person. I'm glad I thought of this
    before something went wrong. (I was a board member when I became the
    contact, and for years before that, until January 2024.)


    Because we are short of money (because the documents have made it so
    hard to raise the dues (and for other reasons)

    Someone wrote to ask what the other reasons were that it was hard to
    raise dues or other money.
    1) The place was pretty well built but we keep having water main leaks
    that cost us about 10,000 each time. Several times a year. We were
    told that they should have used flexible (steel) water pipes so that
    when heavy trucks drove down the streets they wouldn't break the pipes,
    but I think we also have water leaks under the sidewalks.

    2) We have a hard time attacting owners with more money because an
    earlier president cancelled our rental contract on the swimming pool, a contract limited by the Maryland Cost-of-Living index, and other
    townhouses and apartments around here all have poois. When I organized
    a slate of 6 candidates who all wanted the pool, for vacant board
    positions (5 expiring and one more because someone moveed away), the
    president lied to the two people counting the votes, saying anyone who
    owed money, including the first, current quarter's dues, on Jan 15, the
    day of the election, could not vote, when the actual rule only kept
    people who also owed the *previous* quarter's dues from voting. Then
    she said she had destroyed the ballots 3 days after the election. With
    the help of the clerks at the county clerks' office I sued her and the
    Board. Of course try had D&O insurance to pay for their lawyer and I
    only had me, but I did pretty well, until their side decided to have new
    board elections, and after most of my slate was elected (but not me this
    time. I think I had become too controversial) she somehow convinced
    enough of them to no longer support the pool. I wish I had asked them
    how, but I was too disgusted to talk to them.
    She also lied at a meeting and said that the apartment building which
    owned the pool was planning to fill it in. I talked to the manager of
    the building and he said Never. Not many of his residents used the pool
    but even if no one did, they had to have it because "no one would rent"
    if there were no pool, even if they never use it. She was quite a liar.
    She also got the homestead credit both for her house and the one her son
    lives in that is in her name, even though the law only allows a person
    to have one house with that credit. She also told me my neighbors were
    saying bad things about me, which I'm sure they were not. She told other neighbors similar bad things. . Our own mini-trump. She has
    Altzheimres now and can't live alone.

    3) The neighborhood is 94% black, has been for years, and even middle
    income blacks with good jobs tend not have as much savings or
    disposeable income. It was about 20% black when I moved her almost 42
    years ago, and from knowing a little about Baltimore, I knew before I
    bought that it would increase. I am white, and I've always lived
    below/well within my means. Increased dues etc. don't bother me.
    My lawyer hired to help me buy the house also told me that the
    percent of black peopole would increase and I've yet to decide if I
    should dislike him for collaborating in the "Let's keep property values
    low for blacks by discouraging white people from buying there, etc." or
    I should recognize that he was doing his duty by educating me and
    promoting my possible interests, in case this mattered to me, which he
    probably thought likely.

    (He also gave me a flat price, and then failed to remind me to get
    title insurance, and when I asked why he didn't, he said I "didn't need
    it" (even though the house lots come in many different shapes and sizes
    and may not be built where the plat says they are supposed to be and the property was subdivided for the first time when these townhouses were
    built, 4 years earlier, and it turned out, we were using land we did not
    own. It didn't effect my lot but we had to give the next n'hood land we
    did own so we could keep the part we were using but didn't own.

    --
    I think you can tell, but just to be sure:
    I am not a lawyer.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stuart O. Bronstein@21:1/5 to Barry Gold on Fri Feb 7 08:43:08 2025
    Barry Gold <[email protected]> wrote in news:vo41bh$2eln4$1@dont-
    email.me:

    Even though you are not a director or officer, you are acting as agent
    for the HoA. So the general rule of respondeat superior or � olet the
    master answer� applies.

    Respondeat Superior only means the employer can be held responsible. It doesn't mean the employee isn't responsible. On the contrary, everyone is always personally responsible for their own torts, even if someone else is
    also responsible.

    --
    Stu
    http://DownToEarthLawyer.com


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam@21:1/5 to micky on Sat Feb 8 08:15:19 2025
    On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 08:39:45 -0800 (PST), micky <[email protected]> wrote:

    Could I be found liable under the following circumstances?
    Would I be covered by our Directors and Officers insurance if I am
    neither a director nor an officer? In Maryland.


    If you have home owners insurance then look into an umbrella policy for general liability.

    IANAL.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From micky@21:1/5 to Stuart O. Bronstein on Sat Feb 8 09:23:39 2025
    In misc.legal.moderated, on Fri, 7 Feb 2025 08:43:08 -0800 (PST),
    "Stuart O. Bronstein" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Barry Gold <[email protected]> wrote in news:vo41bh$2eln4$1@dont- >email.me:

    Even though you are not a director or officer, you are acting as agent
    for the HoA. So the general rule of respondeat superior or � olet the
    master answer� applies.

    Respondeat Superior only means the employer can be held responsible. It >doesn't mean the employee isn't responsible. On the contrary, everyone is >always personally responsible for their own torts, even if someone else is >also responsible.

    It looks like I/we'll never know what the D&O insurance policy says,
    because it was easier for them to just let me resign as snow contact.
    It's for the better. I usually turn my cell phone off when I'm home and
    I kept forgetting to keep it on when snow or ice was expected, or to
    check if it was expected. Not very likely my scenario** would happen,
    but none of the things D&O insure for are very likely. **I didn't even
    list the possibility someone was hit and killed by the sliding car,

    Thanks all.
    --
    Stu
    http://DownToEarthLawyer.com

    --
    I think you can tell, but just to be sure:
    I am not a lawyer.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Barry Gold@21:1/5 to Stuart O. Bronstein on Mon Feb 10 21:17:04 2025
    On 2/7/2025 8:43 AM, Stuart O. Bronstein wrote:
    Barry Gold<[email protected]> wrote innews:vo41bh$2eln4$1@dont-
    email.me:

    Even though you are not a director or officer, you are acting as agent
    for the HoA. So the general rule of respondeat superior or ƒ olet the
    master answerƒ applies.
    Respondeat Superior only means the employer can be held responsible. It doesn't mean the employee isn't responsible. On the contrary, everyone is always personally responsible for their own torts, even if someone else is also responsible.

    That's what I said: the employer (HoA) can be held responsible, but the
    actual tortfeasor (the original poster) can also be held responsible. If someone is injured, they will probably sue both, collect what they can
    from the OP, then the rest from the HoA.

    I see from a later post that OP is no longer the "snow contact", so the
    problem is now moot.

    --
    I do so have a memory. It's backed up on DVD... somewhere...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)