On 3/5/2024 5:05 PM, Stuart O. Bronstein wrote:
micky <[email protected]> wrote:
Since trump was running for president, are the comments from the 5 ussc
judges that the states can't keep off the ballot candidates for house
and senate, and that it takes a law to keep from hoding office OHHER
than president, like AG, considered to be dicta, and not binding. Not
even precedent, just dicta.
Yes, technically it's dicta. But it's unlikely that anyone will try something that violates it any time soon.
There seems to be precedent
E.g., 17 Annals of Cong. 870–902, 904–20, 927–47, 949–50, 1059–61, 1231–33, 1234–38 (1807) (House seated William McCreery despite him not satisfying Maryland law requiring Representatives to reside in their
district).
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)