• Re: Trump Loses Effort To Hide Jan 6 Details

    From espinoza abortion rentals@21:1/5 to Michael A Terrell on Sun Oct 20 23:12:08 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns, sac.politics
    XPost: alt.fan.sean-hannity, alt.society.liberalism

    On 10/20/2024 10:00 AM, Michael A Terrell wrote:
    On 10/19/2024 6:19 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:

    In article <AnYQO.243581$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...

    On 10/19/2024 7:15 AM, NoBody wrote:
    On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:57:01 +0000, "Lee" <[email protected]> wrote:



    Jan. 6 case appendix to be released
    Friday after judge denies Trump's
    request
    Oct 18

    The judge in former President Trump's
    federal Jan. 6 case on Thursday
    evening rejected his lawyers' request
    to delay the court-ordered release of
    a redacted appendix of new evidence
    from special counsel Jack Smith.

    Why it matters: Trump's lawyers said
    delaying the case until after the
    election would allow them to submit
    a counter to the appendix that the
    special counsel's office filed, but
    U.S. District Court Judge Tanya
    Chutkan denied their request and
    ordered Smith's dossier be unsealed
    with redactions on Friday.
    https://www.axios.com/2024/10/17/trump-jan-6-case-documents-release-jack-smith


    Look at you approving at prosecutors and judges engaging in election
    interference.

    What bullshit! Nothing about the prosecution of Trump is "election
    interference," neither by design nor by unintended consequence. It is
    not
    "election interference" in any way.

    How do you know?

    We all know that it isn't election interference.

    Why was the Obama appointed judge smirking?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)