XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans, talk.politics.guns

Joel wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

crockpot <[email protected]> wrote:

<look at me look at me>

<crosspost to cola snipped>

--
Bureaucrat, n.:
A person who cuts red tape sideways.
-- J. McCabe

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics..republiscums/QAnon.are.lying.treasonous.insurrectionist.shitbags.oh.yes.they.are, Oh.no.this.most.certainly.is.NOT.going.to.comp.os.linux.advocacy
XPost: talk.politics.guns

On 2/6/2025 9:17 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

"Joel" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...

Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote:

On Wed, 05 Feb 2025 19:44:00 -0500, Joel <[email protected]> wrote:

pothead <[email protected]> wrote:

Your honor, so it's acceptable for biological females to be forced to >>>>>>> shower, share locker rooms
and so forth with biological males? So why is it not acceptable for >>>>>>> biological males to share similar
with biological males dressed as females?

If you had basic maturity, you'd be fine with trans women in women's >>>>>> spaces.  It's always stunted-growth, arrested-development bitches who >>>>>> are the TERFs.  They can fuck off.

You do realize that SCOTUS judge Ketanji Jackson was unable to define a woman.

Well it's not the easiest thing to answer verbally, in a session like
the judiciary committee would've had with her.  As with a lot of
things, "you know it when you see it" - my GF has a cock and two
balls, but you'd never think that meeting her clothed.

Any guy can put on a dress.

If you have a dick, you go there.  If not, you go here.

NEXT!

That's pretty out of touch and date, "governor", if a trans woman is
required to enter the male spaces, there's substantial threat *to
him*,

I unethically edited your post.

Of course you did, scooter.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics..republiscums/QAnon.are.lying.treasonous.insurrectionist.shitbags.oh.yes.they.are, Oh.no.this.most.certainly.is.NOT.going.to.comp.os.linux.advocacy
XPost: talk.politics.guns

On 2/7/2025 3:33 AM, NoBody wrote:

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 12:19:54 -0800, Siri Cruise
<[email protected]> wrote:

Scout wrote:

That's pretty out of touch and date, "governor", if a trans
woman is
required to enter the male spaces, there's substantial threat *to
him*,

Corrected your misspelling.

The Eighth does not mention male, female, whatever. It says no
person regardless of your criteria can be subject to cruel or
unusual punishment.

So you admit that the 8th does not permit the state to force men and
women to use the same bathrooms as trans people. This is progress
for you!

The eighth amendment has nothing to do with toilets. It pertains only to criminal defendants and convicts. It has no applicability to whether or not transsexuals are allowed to use the toilet facilities for the gender with which they identify — no applicability whatsoever.

If trans women are allowed to use women's toilets and locker rooms, non-trans women are not being punished by the criminal justice system. The eighth amendment simply does not apply.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)