1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. MISC.FACTS.STRAIGHT-DOPE

  • RAF Shawbury at the forefront of Total Safety

    From Hactar@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sun Apr 3 10:39:25 2016
    XPost: alt.fan.cecil-adams

    In article <[email protected]>,
    Bill Turlock <[email protected]> wrote:
    RAF Shawbury are yet again at the forefront of the concept of Total
    Safety and are the first station in the military to introduce a
    dedicated cycle lane on its main runway:

    https://www.facebook.com/RAFShawbury/posts/1203808449636852:0?_fb_noscript=1

    I assume cyclists are evicted when aircraft use the runway? There would
    be hell to pay if an aircraft wiped out a peloton.

    --
    Mini geyser lamp: http://imgur.com/c6bHOCc Where can I buy one?
    -eben [email protected] ebmanda.redirectme.net:81
    "windows seems to have stupidity buil[t] into it." -- sobriquet on a.o.l.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Wright@21:1/5 to Hactar on Sun Apr 3 10:14:36 2016
    XPost: alt.fan.cecil-adams

    On 4/3/2016 9:39 AM, Hactar wrote:
    In article <[email protected]>,
    Bill Turlock <[email protected]> wrote:
    RAF Shawbury are yet again at the forefront of the concept of Total
    Safety and are the first station in the military to introduce a
    dedicated cycle lane on its main runway:

    https://www.facebook.com/RAFShawbury/posts/1203808449636852:0?_fb_noscript=1

    I assume cyclists are evicted when aircraft use the runway? There would
    be hell to pay if an aircraft wiped out a peloton.

    Seems no one looks at the date of articles any more.

    --
    I never said most of the things I said.
    -Yogi Berra


    Tim W

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hactar@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sun Apr 3 12:11:26 2016
    XPost: alt.fan.cecil-adams

    In article <[email protected]>,
    Tim Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 4/3/2016 9:39 AM, Hactar wrote:
    In article <[email protected]>,
    Bill Turlock <[email protected]> wrote:
    RAF Shawbury are yet again at the forefront of the concept of Total
    Safety and are the first station in the military to introduce a
    dedicated cycle lane on its main runway:

    https://www.facebook.com/RAFShawbury/posts/1203808449636852:0?_fb_noscript=1

    I assume cyclists are evicted when aircraft use the runway? There would
    be hell to pay if an aircraft wiped out a peloton.

    Seems no one looks at the date of articles any more.

    Yes well, err, in my defense I'd like to say WHOA! Look at that bird!

    --
    Mini geyser lamp: http://imgur.com/c6bHOCc Where can I buy one?
    -eben [email protected] ebmanda.redirectme.net:81
    An idea that is not dangerous is unworthy of
    being called an idea at all. -- Oscar Wilde

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Goss@21:1/5 to Hactar on Sun Apr 3 21:02:28 2016
    XPost: alt.fan.cecil-adams

    [email protected] (Hactar) wrote:

    In article <[email protected]>,
    Tim Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 4/3/2016 9:39 AM, Hactar wrote:
    In article <[email protected]>,
    Bill Turlock <[email protected]> wrote:
    RAF Shawbury are yet again at the forefront of the concept of Total
    Safety and are the first station in the military to introduce a
    dedicated cycle lane on its main runway:

    https://www.facebook.com/RAFShawbury/posts/1203808449636852:0?_fb_noscript=1

    I assume cyclists are evicted when aircraft use the runway? There would >> > be hell to pay if an aircraft wiped out a peloton.

    Seems no one looks at the date of articles any more.

    Yes well, err, in my defense I'd like to say WHOA! Look at that bird!

    Especially when they reduced "Aviation Partition Regulation �
    International Legislation Form 001" to its acronym.
    --
    We are geeks. Resistance is voltage over current.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hactar@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon Apr 4 13:34:20 2016
    XPost: alt.fan.cecil-adams

    In article <[email protected]>,
    Whiskers <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 2016-04-04, Greg Goss <[email protected]> wrote:
    Bill Turlock <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 10:14:36 -0500, Tim Wright <[email protected]> >>wrote:
    I assume cyclists are evicted when aircraft use the runway? There
    would be hell to pay if an aircraft wiped out a peloton.

    Seems no one looks at the date of articles any more.

    Or, indeed, the Regulation cite in the article. Or... *we* are being >>whooshed, or 'gossed'.

    Hactar could have claimed to be gossing, but he'd already conceded by
    the time you raised the possibility.

    I look forward to the legislation requiring military jets to have
    notices on the back warning cyclists not to enter the pilot's blind
    spot.

    I want to see Braille flight instructions in the cockpit.

    --
    Mini geyser lamp: http://imgur.com/c6bHOCc Where can I buy one?
    "On two occasions I have been asked, -- 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put
    into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?'
    ... I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)