On Friday, 16 October 2020 00:05:06 UTC-6,
[email protected] wrote:
I have been doing some additional research and it appears to be related to improved functionality (https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/implicit-intersection-operator-ce3be07b-0101-4450-a24e-c1c999be2b34?ui=en-us&rs=en-us&ad=us). Excel seems to
be interpreting the formulas intent differently than the original intent as it was entered. Any idea how this can be overridden?
One other thought - maybe the original formula needs to be rewritten so that Excel interprets it correctly so that when it is copied downward it behaves as expected.
Original formula (written into the sheet from Matlab as a string) - based on an earlier post ---
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/microsoft.public.excel/DF57UsZfTjA
=IFERROR(INDEX(Q:$Q,SMALL(IF($O$3:$O$32=AA$2,ROW($3:$32)),ROW(B1))),NA())
Excel's reinterpretation =IFERROR(@INDEX($Q:$Q,SMALL(IF(@$O$3:$O$32=AA$2,@ROW($3:$32)),ROW(B1))),NA())
What would I change in the 'string' so that Excel interprets it correctly.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)