kangie posted on Sat, 28 Jun 2025 20:49:29 +1000 as excerpted:
In 2025 FTP is increasingly uncommon. The world we live in is (mostly)
HTTPS, and SRC_URI should reflect that.
++
Add additional commentry about (and use SRC_URI to show an example of) renaming the distfile with `->` when required.
# Point to any required sources; these will be automatically downloaded by -# Portage.
-SRC_URI="ftp://foo.example.org/${P}.tar.gz"
+# Portage. If a file needs to be renamed, use the "->" syntax. +SRC_URI="https://files.example.org/foo/v${PV}.tar.xz -> ${P}.tar.xz"
So I suppose I'm as portage-positive as the next guy, but...
Maybe take the opportunity to s/Portage/package manager/ (mangler?) or
some such while you're at it? (Or maybe "EAPI compliant package manager"
if just PM's too generic, or just PM if it's not considered to ambiguous...) Just seems a bit like tunnel vision to specifically name portage in something like skel.ebuild these days, even if portage /is/ the vast majority, user-side.
(Of course doesn't /have/ to be /this/ commit if someone thinks that needs
more discussion than the simple s/ftp/https/ stuff or maybe council needs
to vote on a change like that... but the discussion would need to start somewhere even if it won't go in this commit, so...)
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)