• time64 & LFS for 32-bit arches (Re: [gentoo-dev] Arch Status and Future

    From Sam James@21:1/5 to Arthur Zamarin on Wed Jun 26 02:20:01 2024
    Arthur Zamarin <[email protected]> writes:

    Hi all, this will be a long mail, and might be confusing, I'll try to organize it, but this is a mess, so bear with me.

    ======== 32-bit arches ========

    This includes stable arches x86, arm, ppc, sparc32, dev arches s390, and maybe more. Those are in much worse situation, with a mess on various
    fronts, some of them super hard to continue support. For example
    qtwebengine is less and less likely to manage to compile on a
    real-hardware, and not 32-bit chroot on 64-bit host. Arch Team want to minimize our work on those arches, meaning mass-destable and even mass-dekeyword, with potentially full drop of stable status.


    We haven't yet migrated to 64-bit time_t (and off_t - Large File
    Support/LFS) which will fix a lot of general test failures.

    Doing that before making any decision has value in two ways:
    1) It might make the situation a lot better, who knows?

    2) Even if we do then do a mass purge after, it leaves users on such
    platforms in a good state to keep stabilisation until after we're done,
    to help find any possible issues.

    dilfridge is currently beginning the time64 prep work (it requires LFS
    too).

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iOUEARYKAI0WIQQlpruI3Zt2TGtVQcJzhAn1IN+RkAUCZnteh18UgAAAAAAuAChp c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MjVB NkJCODhERDlCNzY0QzZCNTU0MUMyNzM4NDA5RjUyMERGOTE5MA8cc2FtQGdlbnRv by5vcmcACgkQc4QJ9SDfkZBfawEAnU1DNdmnYnivZ/ZkppQdAXz7XceQ8lN/1hiN LQ0JDLQA/3NmNu75RnW8HooDdHtb1se9pTKOoDgjrRVZIweTXeAK
    =WksY
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)