Arthur Zamarin posted on Sun, 16 Jun 2024 21:15:25 +0300 as excerpted:
On 16/06/2024 18.51, Florian Schmaus wrote:
This new eclass includes various improvements over the existing
readme.gentoo-r1.eclass.
So, some weird question from me - why is it called greadme? I can
understand why you don't want to modify existing eclass, but why not
call it "readme.gentoo-r2.eclass"? This should make it a little less confusing (cause I imagine folks asking - which to use. With -r2 we all
know which one is better).
I had the same question but it was answered to my satisfaction in
[PATCH v3 0/1]. Quoting from that:
[I]f anyone wants to have function names like
'readme.gentoo-r2_pkg_postinst', then we can go with that.
Convinced me! greadme's /just/ fine, thankyou! =:^)
(Tho purely bikeshedding I'd prefer g2readme or gen2readme. Which FWIW
would match my gentoo bug shortcut g2b/g2bug...)
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)