1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.GENTOO.DEV

  • [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category: dev-debug

    From =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?=@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 7 13:50:01 2024
    Hi,

    I'd like to propose adding a new dev-debug category. The description
    could be:

    Code debuggers and debugging-related tools.

    Potential candidates include:

    dev-util/ald: Assembly Language Debugger
    dev-util/apitrace: Tool for tracing, analyzing, and debugging graphics APIs dev-util/bpftrace: High-level tracing language for eBPF
    dev-util/cgdb: A curses front-end for GDB, the GNU debugger
    dev-util/d-feet: D-Feet is a powerful D-Bus debugger
    dev-util/d-spy: D-spy is a blisteringly fast D-Bus debugger
    dev-util/ddd: Graphical front-end for command-line debuggers dev-util/edb-debugger: edb is a cross platform x86/x86-64 debugger, inspired by Ollydbg
    dev-util/kdbg: Graphical debugger interface
    dev-util/leaktracer: Trace and analyze memory leaks in C++ programs dev-util/lldb: The LLVM debugger
    dev-util/ltrace: trace library calls made at runtime
    dev-util/pretrace: start dynamically linked applications under debugging environment
    dev-util/pwndbg: A GDB plug-in that makes debugging with GDB suck less dev-util/strace: Useful diagnostic, instructional, and debugging tool dev-util/sysdig: A system exploration and troubleshooting tool dev-util/systemtap: A linux trace/probe tool
    dev-util/valgrind: An open-source memory debugger for GNU/Linux media-gfx/renderdoc: A stand-alone graphics debugging tool
    sys-devel/gdb: GNU debugger
    sys-devel/gdb-apple: Apple branch of the GNU Debugger, Developer Tools 4.3

    This was originally prompted by bug 920438 [1], pointing out that LLDB
    and GDB belong to the same category. dev-util/ currently carries 428
    packages, so I suppose it makes sense to split it some more, especially
    when we can clearly distinguish some more specific groups.

    [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/920438

    --
    Best regards,
    Michał Górny


    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQFGBAABCgAwFiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAmWanasSHG1nb3JueUBn ZW50b28ub3JnAAoJEGOa2uIyniQOoXgIAIcGc0dsr2QUJSinnkZSh1f9Ofs15Xnn UClFK8FOARuPBSXIKjSpm99a1pz6gUFFWeGT0Vx1Gpk+F/wOhzOMTBP9DXPMD/Nt sPvzYjoeDYe2nkl11ip/m7Vhh0e+dPNY6J7Icqlggbsg0+6afXuiW3753UVSNydS MnSgcUO3CG9/dWXmkw5ot9p423qWssuif5l9wqKNLNYMoakBO+Dag2rVHi3T3URf XKplUPuVSSJ5BKeGmPyZN2lBmy0OCL4i0xDuFz3O60e0CeFL6CxojrykSUKGluiM b7vA/ZOTkmXUMzrr9oHyssQyJXFs73UF3UW/IdxObXiZ0DIafYNxBD0=
    =ay0z
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam James@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sun Jan 7 14:30:01 2024
    Michał Górny <[email protected]> writes:

    [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
    Hi,

    I'd like to propose adding a new dev-debug category. The description
    could be:

    Code debuggers and debugging-related tools.

    Sounds good.


    Potential candidates include:

    [...]

    dev-util/seer as well would be a good fit.


    This was originally prompted by bug 920438 [1], pointing out that LLDB
    and GDB belong to the same category. dev-util/ currently carries 428 packages, so I suppose it makes sense to split it some more, especially
    when we can clearly distinguish some more specific groups.


    Does anything dominate dev-util post-move or is it a real mix?

    [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/920438

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?=@21:1/5 to Sam James on Sun Jan 7 14:40:02 2024
    On Sun, 2024-01-07 at 13:20 +0000, Sam James wrote:

    This was originally prompted by bug 920438 [1], pointing out that LLDB
    and GDB belong to the same category.  dev-util/ currently carries 428 packages, so I suppose it makes sense to split it some more, especially when we can clearly distinguish some more specific groups.


    Does anything dominate dev-util post-move or is it a real mix?

    Nothing immediately stands out but there might be too many packages to
    see a pattern.

    --
    Best regards,
    Michał Górny


    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQFGBAABCgAwFiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAmWap4kSHG1nb3JueUBn ZW50b28ub3JnAAoJEGOa2uIyniQOdpoH/0jBBKHdimTFvLRssAkhQywIjcoFZ/LM JUwgUCvTl7fYyTk9cUt6OhoyinfTjLCd2g8JqnZUxDFIxRPhE9DfCXWZ/ZJLkZru AfBKImcnW+9J2o7nBw9TldWLm6eFlznAjExHTqLXnxNw+LX8QRdQLnBoDybyOe5O AQMGPEjFqdOLW/1T/y1TIY6lpTi1/YQydkUqOQQ7BUjXaELFSOiqPQ3UrLFGVaaE /dEGnxJfkNblJQFSPPE7+ft7frvjO/wKvT0tribVD7XORABNKLGLhS8SUmYpUvZr okxY/1MuMjy51NWOcA5jMdPyT1r6Xg+ZqdlIcLVUkJpT6vzOu37Zv14=
    =irdM
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam James@21:1/5 to Florian Schmaus on Wed Jan 10 12:10:01 2024
    Florian Schmaus <[email protected]> writes:

    [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
    On 07/01/2024 13.48, Michał Górny wrote:
    Hi,
    I'd like to propose adding a new dev-debug category. The
    description
    could be:
    Code debuggers and debugging-related tools.

    Seems sensible. I'd probably drop the "Code" from the description,
    since packages like d-spy do not primarily debug code.

    I assume profilers are explicitly not part of this category?

    leio had the same question and we came up with a list of about 5-6
    packages at least which would fit in a dev-profile category...


    - Flow


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Viorel Munteanu@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 10 14:50:01 2024
    La 07.01.2024 14:48, Michał Górny a scris:
    Hi,

    I'd like to propose adding a new dev-debug category. The description
    could be:

    Code debuggers and debugging-related tools.

    Potential candidates include:

    dev-util/rr would be a good candidate too.


    Regards,

    Viorel

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)