On Mon, 04 Sep 2023, Michał Górny wrote:
--- a/eclass/verify-sig.eclass
+++ b/eclass/verify-sig.eclass
@@ -214,12 +214,15 @@ verify-sig_verify_message() {
}
# @FUNCTION: verify-sig_verify_unsigned_checksums
-# @USAGE: <checksum-file> <algo> <files>
+# @USAGE: <checksum-file> <format> <files>
Below, verify-sig_verify_signed_checksums() still says "algo", change
that too for consistency?
# @DESCRIPTION:
# Verify the checksums for all files listed in the space-separated list
-# <files> (akin to ${A}) using a <checksum-file>. <algo> specifies
-# the checksum algorithm (e.g. sha256). <checksum-file> can be "-"
-# for stdin.
+# <files> (akin to ${A}) using a <checksum-file>. <format> specifies
+# the checksum file format. <checksum-file> can be "-" for stdin.
+#
+# The following formats are supported:
+# - sha256 -- sha256sum (<hash> <filename>)
+# - openssl-dgst -- openssl dgst (<algo>(<filename>)=<hash>)
This won't be rendered as a list in the man page, but will be rewrapped
as a paragraph. (Putting a space before the "-" will help.)
The existing variable documentation of VERIFY_SIG_METHOD suffers from
the same problem, BTW.
#
# The function dies if one of the files does not match checksums or
# is missing from the checksum file.
@@ -234,32 +237,46 @@ verify-sig_verify_unsigned_checksums() {
local algo=${2}
Maybe rename the variable to "format", when the documentation now says
that the second parameter specifies the format?
local files=()
read -r -d '' -a files <<<"${3}"
- local chksum_prog chksum_len
+ local chksum_prog chksum_len format=coreutils
And rename this one too. (I don't find it intuitive for a checksum
format to be named "coreutils", when coreutils provides cksum, md5sum,
b2sum, etc.)
case ${algo} in
sha256)
- chksum_prog=sha256sum
chksum_len=64
;;
+ openssl-dgst)
+ format=${algo}
+ ;;
*)
- die "${FUNCNAME}: unknown checksum algo ${algo}"
+ die "${FUNCNAME}: unknown checksum format ${algo}"
;;
esac
[[ ${checksum_file} == - ]] && checksum_file=/dev/stdin
- local checksum filename junk ret=0 count=0
- while read -r checksum filename junk; do
- if [[ ${checksum} == "-----BEGIN" ]]; then
+ local line checksum filename junk ret=0 count=0
+ while read -r line; do
+ if [[ ${line} == "-----BEGIN"* ]]; then
die "${FUNCNAME}: PGP armor found, use verify-sig_verify_signed_checksums instead"
fi
- [[ ${#checksum} -eq ${chksum_len} ]] || continue
- [[ -z ${checksum//[0-9a-f]} ]] || continue
- has "${filename}" "${files[@]}" || continue
- [[ -z ${junk} ]] || continue
-
- "${chksum_prog}" -c --strict - <<<"${checksum} ${filename}"
- if [[ ${?} -eq 0 ]]; then
+ case ${format} in
+ coreutils)
+ read -r checksum filename junk <<<"${line}"
+ [[ ${#checksum} -ne ${chksum_len} ]] && continue
+ [[ -n ${checksum//[0-9a-f]} ]] && continue
+ [[ -n ${junk} ]] && continue
+ ;;
+ openssl-dgst)
+ [[ ${line} != *"("*")="* ]] && continue
+ checksum=${line##*)=}
+ algo=${line%%(*}
+ filename=${line#*(}
+ filename=${filename%)=*}
+ ;;
+ esac
+
+ ! has "${filename}" "${files[@]}" && continue
This might be clearer if it was written as:
has "${filename}" "${files[@]}" || continue
+
+ if "${algo,,}sum" -c --strict - <<<"${checksum} ${filename}"; then
(( count++ ))
else
ret=1
--=-=-Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQFDBAEBCAAtFiEEtDnZ1O9xIP68rzDbUYgzUIhBXi4FAmT1fEIPHHVsbUBnZW50 b28ub3JnAAoJEFGIM1CIQV4uaysIAJyq7wka58gaiKup2NSbp3QhVzDL1jq+tqkK PkNTftRzRdg2P2yULITRorZxmFOyksrFVWcE1s/H5qpGE0mUvskmi5dNWS7fceic kGr05gsa44wiBeVlWGJG9qKEq7xDHexSnmCLpeGxbhhzNpVrJ8ddRIq7y+/6kNCt u71+bTRmA8z60F0z6K1sIjHXXGXgsLUD668R68Y05L/HlfoOtOWOPevXOQReWLi4 CkX3q6BE6Sgh1+PGW1uUOAPm6AE/LB6FkmdnpTB1CedkOMlXPGFCekJRYc0VaiGY WgAFamKm2gcOjIDFnj9JA1Wh8IOJtEw5p4D6aNQv7/RM8FXdGEo=jAK9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)