1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.KERNEL

  • Bug#1064976: marked as done (linux-headers-6.6.13+bpo-amd64 incorrectly

    From Bastian Blank@21:1/5 to Debian Bug Tracking System on Sat Apr 6 09:51:27 2024
    XPost: linux.debian.bugs.dist

    On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 08:39:06PM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
    No. We need to make sure someone installing linux-image-bla and linux-headers-bla have the same version, so the modules are compatible.

    Revisiting this bug, I might have been not explicit enough. This
    dependency is needed, so headers and kernel will be available in the
    same version and dkms is able to build modules for the just installed
    kernel.

    dkms will check that and break installation if this precondition is not provided. And no better solution is known to make sure we can build
    those modules.

    It however have nothing to do with vmlinux.h, which is not for kernel
    modules.

    Bastian

    --
    We have phasers, I vote we blast 'em!
    -- Bailey, "The Corbomite Maneuver", stardate 1514.2

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to Colm Buckley on Sat Apr 6 09:51:50 2024
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Mon, 1 Apr 2024 22:35:09 +0200
    with message-id <[email protected]>
    and subject line Re: Bug#1064976: linux-headers-6.6.13+bpo-amd64 incorrectly depends on the corresponding linux-image-amd64 package
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1064976,
    regarding linux-headers-6.6.13+bpo-amd64 incorrectly depends on the corresponding linux-image-amd64 package
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
    immediately.)


    --
    1064976: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064976
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact [email protected] with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Feb 2024 17:19:44 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
    BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,FOURLA,HAS_PACKAGE,HELO_LH_HOME,SPF_HELO_NONE,
    SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,XMAILER_REPORTBUG autolearn=ham
    autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 37; hammy, 150; neutral, 72; spammy,
    0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--X-Debbugs-Cc,
    0.000-+--XDebbugsCc, 0.000-+--sk:taint_o, 0.000-+--sk:TAINT_O,
    0.000-+--sk:taint_u
    Return-path: <[email protected]>
    Received: from lugh.home.tuatha.org ([2a01:258:f100:107:8647:9ff:fe18:9]:48756 helo=lugh.tuatha.home)
    by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2)
    (envelope-from <c