1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.KERNEL

  • Bug#1092550: procps: Addback/Provide example of sysctl.d/*.conf like th

    From Ben Hutchings@1:229/2 to All on Sun May 25 18:30:01 2025
    XPost: linux.debian.bugs.dist
    From: [email protected]

    On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 16:23:32 +1100 Craig Small <[email protected]>
    wrote:
    reassign -1 linux-sysctl-defaults
    thankyou

    The procps package doesn't carry any of the sysctl configuration files anymore, but they're in the linux-sysctl-defaults
    so reassigning to that package.
    [...]

    linux-sysctl-defaults is meant to provide defaults only. Therefore I
    don't think it is appropriate to add that example/template to it.

    What is the problem with keeping an example in procps?

    Ben.

    --
    Ben Hutchings
    Teamwork is essential - it allows you to blame someone else.

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEErCspvTSmr92z9o8157/I7JWGEQkFAmgzP9cACgkQ57/I7JWG EQmRjg/9Ga0srJmO73rJEOqsGDsN/OfNV7qF4vqk11xMJaUlYBHA5I+Lh1rYRz6n K0uNdaZ0kko02PpduLr/VBBLVSPfkgunW2yxuDSVIvcLRfF6u3FR+G9wQtRGG9l3 Up6fjXmAdWCW6EjXnnSdj+641FHqA27eyDLsU4nK5Nb9SoIZpf7WsxvU+M86jAa3 lpSbsARBtTBovY3ZwF+D54OIMzTdhI0IsjF40wZuPvvkOCdQCCn/0eGU1bpPkwNx mfrqca7+ekc6NYvMUj02f1IiF0WQvBcB+truTc1K9J2fmyBlEwdHB3fH/GFV//7S SzFasHzNidBDQOtkB5gIsWTi3J5w2aYKhZfwhZHi4lotY1yJFwN6qMDK9KgGZ4MR BYVd+akrZITSzbCvlvYQqBHDk1nPRyY0gzTkAZ/LaHqj6yHSCP3O0L2+iVLP71Ti Ag/WoJb7vnIlO26xzxP+/1gf6WcqOGljzJttTv01JbAU7MpbpgWq/OqEOY1NjsOY oRMcMHe6blVBBH+ebKtkLWILxRsUUC31zfV+gfULf4i3eEfD/P1nNRcIc9lu7tLp W1c0O2HVvg5tLp/HgdDELOmehf0NdY+UpgA2Po3MMXqpSjTaKlbYEZOR6iEvy7mK 51GTg/iMT4QYitYtQQn+xmydrIJrIxazbdszbHCEFAux3H5Nvl8=
    =983C
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/
  • From Craig Small@1:229/2 to Ben Hutchings on Mon May 26 12:30:01 2025
    XPost: linux.debian.bugs.dist
    From: [email protected]

    On Mon, 26 May 2025 at 02:05, Ben Hutchings <[email protected]> wrote:

    linux-sysctl-defaults is meant to provide defaults only. Therefore I
    don't think it is appropriate to add that example/template to it.

    What is the problem with keeping an example in procps?

    I can do that, but on a standard Debian system you're not even using the
    procps sysctl to do the parsing as it is systemd-sysctl in the systemd
    package doing it.

    It's not going to hurt putting it there, I'm just not sure anyone is going
    to find it because the
    only reason for an example sysctl file is historical.

    - Craig

    <div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Mon, 26 May 2025 at 02:05, Ben Hutchings &lt;<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt; wrote:</div><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px
    0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">linux-sysctl-defaults is meant to provide defaults only.  Therefore I<br>
    don&#39;t think it is appropriate to add that example/template to it.<br>

    What is the problem with keeping an example in procps?<br></blockquote><div>I can do that, but on a standard Debian system you&#39;re not even using the </div><div>procps sysctl to do the parsing as it is systemd-sysctl in the systemd package doing it.</
    <div><br></div><div>It&#39;s not going to hurt putting it there, I&#39;m just not sure anyone is going to find it because the</div><div>only reason for an example sysctl file is historical.<br></div><div><br></div><div> - Craig</div><br></div></div>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
  • From Craig Small@1:229/2 to Ben Hutchings on Wed May 28 23:30:01 2025
    XPost: linux.debian.bugs.dist
    From: [email protected]

    reassign -1 procps
    thankyou

    On Thu, 29 May 2025 at 06:33, Ben Hutchings <[email protected]> wrote:

    I think system administrators looking to experiment with sysctl changes
    are more likely to reaach for procps and the sysctl command, because:

    - sysctl is on the path while systemd-sysctl isn't
    - "apt search sysctl" finds procps and not systemd
    - A web search for "linux sysctl examples" finds mostly pages mentioning
    the sysctl command

    That seems fair enough, I'll put them into procps.

    - Craig

    <div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">reassign -1 procps<br>thankyou</div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, 29 May 2025 at 06:33, Ben Hutchings &lt;<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected].
    uk</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
    I think system administrators looking to experiment with sysctl changes<br>
    are more likely to reaach for procps and the sysctl command, because:<br>

    - sysctl is on the path while systemd-sysctl isn&#39;t<br>
    - &quot;apt search sysctl&quot; finds procps and not systemd<br>
    - A web search for &quot;linux sysctl examples&quot; finds mostly pages mentioning<br>
    the sysctl command<br></blockquote><div>That seems fair enough, I&#39;ll put them into procps.</div><div><br></div><div> - Craig</div><br></div></div>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
  • From Ben Hutchings@1:229/2 to Craig Small on Wed May 28 22:40:01 2025
    XPost: linux.debian.bugs.dist
    From: [email protected]

    On Mon, 2025-05-26 at 20:13 +1000, Craig Small wrote:
    On Mon, 26 May 2025 at 02:05, Ben Hutchings <[email protected]> wrote:
    linux-sysctl-defaults is meant to provide defaults only.  Therefore I don't think it is appropriate to add that example/template to it.

    What is the problem with keeping an example in procps?


    I can do that, but on a standard Debian system you're not even using the  procps sysctl to do the parsing as it is systemd-sysctl in the systemd package doing it.

    I'm well aware of that.

    It's not going to hurt putting it there, I'm just not sure anyone is going to find it because the
    only reason for an example sysctl file is historical.

    I think system administrators looking to experiment with sysctl changes
    are more likely to reaach for procps and the sysctl command, because:

    - sysctl is on the path while systemd-sysctl isn't
    - "apt search sysctl" finds procps and not systemd
    - A web search for "linux sysctl examples" finds mostly pages mentioning
    the sysctl command

    Ben.

    --
    Ben Hutchings
    Always try to do things in chronological order;
    it's less confusing that way.

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEErCspvTSmr92z9o8157/I7JWGEQkFAmg3cvwACgkQ57/I7JWG EQkOGRAAggbHP/WhAW4HThSBRvK+jXHsQWNOD0zkaWrXAN/OzS7Y2ojn07NXNhHQ seIleBLbyqfjc28xb747/mnTy03v4jcbeI7G3iOn+o601N7ucvcsVTNtVQBOgGzi MXNMnAneS7GoGvG3tamG1pqmS3JLcnvO2vnc0Po7Tkz43sR6aoMfIi13LKt7APVE xHwxfkgBErVt2i0gV4iYfQ50hwu64qd7K5vr9e5hYBuPKGwfxODRxAsZz6qkRR0X s8QR6oQF8ta4wiHNywsD1R07WY/fBi+aepxnbAlIGGZwEYA//a/31nW8rcWbia4m CbPcj0DZ6XvjYFv42dr7PhkyQ3rH112xZW4Q1FyDc/jKyRea/Oq9XgNMJLpKeZdZ pMiEabCPYsNyx4rGpmq0qhgfRW4GpB86M/aD2AVsPBuUvxDVftcSo9+09KhgHdvK 8KXx2JkOtnmFGd7pNgQoluU8TKiBeDlV4UhQgzOKk8n79PlOobojzcEGgcSVdWKc 27oo4sQLPh7aXJ5FRXU7u9mfEJ1sp0AyEuhkNFMWjKN7SHvfcts/nkl5GNdK7/yH 5Oj7a0/qMyirmM0PINlp8szzDJUeuCIujx27VKR9ECH1wyNcguz7c8wMgVe8ZoyT RBgtNgeYzVlV8T8n4TmNox6EWiL5LC3GYoO3auYmWgjtc1JSEVk=
    =JEl6
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the thing