• Multi seat. Was Debian versions

    From Roger Price@21:1/5 to brian mckee on Mon Nov 11 13:40:01 2024
    This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
    while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

    On Mon, 11 Nov 2024, brian mckee wrote:

    I have a work station.��
    If I put debian on it.
    I want it to have 5 monsters.

    I'm guessing 5 "monitors".

    5 key boards.
    5 mice.
    So 5 people can long in. At same time.

    I'm guessing "login". It's sometimes called Multi Seat.

    What Verizon should I download�

    I'm guessing "version". How about Debian 12 (bookworm). Have you read https://wiki.debian.org/Multi_Seat_Debian_HOWTO ?

    Roger

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Wooledge@21:1/5 to Roger Price on Mon Nov 11 13:50:02 2024
    On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 13:33:08 +0100, Roger Price wrote:
    I'm guessing "version". How about Debian 12 (bookworm). Have you read https://wiki.debian.org/Multi_Seat_Debian_HOWTO ?

    Oh. I've learned something today.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bret Busby@21:1/5 to Roger Price on Mon Nov 11 14:30:01 2024
    On 11/11/24 20:33, Roger Price wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Nov 2024, brian mckee wrote:

    I have a work station.
    If I put debian on it.
    I want it to have 5 monsters.

    I'm guessing 5 "monitors".

    5 key boards.
    5 mice.
    So 5 people can long in. At same time.

    I'm guessing "login".  It's sometimes called Multi Seat.


    With the "5 monsters", each having a separate keyboard and mouse, I
    wonder whether the "monsters" means users...

    It appears that the "workstation is to be set up as a server, with dumb terminals, like UNIX from about 30 years ago (I remember when, in Perth, Western Australia, the Compaq shop was selling a Compaq 386 computer
    with UNIX, to serve up to 32 users), and that, if this is the case, the workstation would need to have 5 video sockets and 10 USB sockets to
    serve the keyboards and meeces ("I hate meeces to pieces" :) ), or, if
    the monitors can be served from USB sockets, 15 USB sockets.

    Whilst this computer that I am using, has about ten USB sockets
    (including four on the front), I expect that a similar workstation to
    this, would be required, or, a proper server, with all of the required
    sockets, both options being, I believe, quite expensive to buy new.

    So, I believe that it would be less expensive, to buy five separate
    computers, probably low-end "laptop" computers, upon which Debian can be installed, and, install Debian on each of them.

    Or, computers with Debian preinstalled...

    https://laptopwithlinux.com/laptops-with-debian-linux-preinstalled/

    https://www.debian.org/distrib/pre-installed

    ..
    Bret Busby
    Armadale
    West Australia
    (UTC+0800)
    ..............

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Price@21:1/5 to Bret Busby on Mon Nov 11 15:10:01 2024
    On Mon, 11 Nov 2024, Bret Busby wrote:
    ..., the workstation would need to have 5 video sockets and 10 USB sockets to serve the keyboards and meeces, or, if the monitors can be served from USB sockets, 15 USB sockets.

    .. I expect that a similar workstation to this, would be required, or, a proper server, with all of the required sockets, both options being, I believe, quite expensive to buy new.

    Would a powered USB hub be of any use? A lot cheaper. Roger

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael =?utf-8?B?S2rDtnJsaW5n?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 11 15:00:01 2024
    On 11 Nov 2024 06:51 -0600, from [email protected] (Nicholas Geovanis):
    In principle it should be possible with any X-Windows system. But I don't know if xfree86 itself can do that, it might require the X display manager and full X-Windows.

    Pretty sure Debian hasn't used XFree86 in a very long time. Certainly
    Bookworm is Xorg if not Wayland.

    --
    Michael Kjörling
    🔗 https://michael.kjorling.se

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael =?utf-8?B?S2rDtnJsaW5n?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 11 15:10:02 2024
    On 11 Nov 2024 21:24 +0800, from [email protected] (Bret Busby):
    Whilst this computer that I am using, has about ten USB sockets (including four on the front), I expect that a similar workstation to this, would be required, or, a proper server, with all of the required sockets, both
    options being, I believe, quite expensive to buy new.

    There are offboard USB controllers (not even all that expensive), to
    say nothing of hubs; so at least that part is manageable, especially
    for low-bandwidth devices like keyboards or mice.

    Probably a bigger problem would be the physical environment those
    people would be sitting in if you want to stay within the length limit
    of USB cables. For example, Wikipedia claims that USB 3 (which you'll
    almost certainly want if you're running video over USB) in practice
    tops out at somewhere around 3 m due to electrical properties; and
    even USB 1.1 and 2.0 are only specified for up to 5 m. Apparently USB
    gateways are a thing to extend this. In contrast, HDMI apparently is
    usable at up to about 13 m.

    --
    Michael Kjörling
    🔗 https://michael.kjorling.se

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bret Busby@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 11 15:20:01 2024
    On 11/11/24 22:00, Michael Kjörling wrote:
    On 11 Nov 2024 21:24 +0800, from [email protected] (Bret Busby):
    Whilst this computer that I am using, has about ten USB sockets (including >> four on the front), I expect that a similar workstation to this, would be
    required, or, a proper server, with all of the required sockets, both
    options being, I believe, quite expensive to buy new.

    There are offboard USB controllers (not even all that expensive), to
    say nothing of hubs; so at least that part is manageable, especially
    for low-bandwidth devices like keyboards or mice.


    My personal experience of USB hubs, is unreliability - sometimes they
    work, and, sometimes they do not - probably about 50% chance of them
    working.

    ..
    Bret Busby
    Armadale
    West Australia
    (UTC+0800)
    ..............

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Ritter@21:1/5 to Bret Busby on Mon Nov 11 16:10:01 2024
    Bret Busby wrote:
    With the "5 monsters", each having a separate keyboard and mouse, I wonder whether the "monsters" means users...

    UNIX, to serve up to 32 users), and that, if this is the case, the workstation would need to have 5 video sockets and 10 USB sockets to serve the keyboards and meeces ("I hate meeces to pieces" :) ), or, if the
    monitors can be served from USB sockets, 15 USB sockets.

    Whilst this computer that I am using, has about ten USB sockets (including four on the front), I expect that a similar workstation to this, would be required, or, a proper server, with all of the required sockets, both
    options being, I believe, quite expensive to buy new.

    Video cards with 6 monitor outputs are available for reasonable
    prices.

    Keyboards and mice are low-speed devices, so USB hubs would be
    practical.

    So, I believe that it would be less expensive, to buy five separate computers, probably low-end "laptop" computers, upon which Debian can be installed, and, install Debian on each of them.

    Often, that is the case. And they can be used to run
    applications on a shared server, though not all of them.

    But, this is a plausibly supportable configuration, so perhaps
    they have a good use case.

    -dsr-

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From [email protected]@21:1/5 to Greg Wooledge on Mon Nov 11 18:10:02 2024
    Greg Wooledge <[email protected]> wrote:
    On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 13:33:08 +0100, Roger Price wrote:
    I'm guessing "version". How about Debian 12 (bookworm). Have you
    read https://wiki.debian.org/Multi_Seat_Debian_HOWTO ?

    Oh. I've learned something today.

    I looked at that page and what I immediately learned is that it seems
    to have been written by a presumably young person who has forgotten or
    never knew the meaning of multi-user.

    Multiseat is one particular form of multiuser computer. There are
    lots of other forms. A computer where one person at a time uses it is
    called a single user computer. It is not a multi user computer.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From [email protected]@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon Nov 11 19:10:01 2024
    Michael Kjörling <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 11 Nov 2024 21:24 +0800, from [email protected] (Bret Busby):
    Whilst this computer that I am using, has about ten USB sockets
    (including four on the front), I expect that a similar workstation
    to this, would be required, or, a proper server, with all of the
    required sockets, both options being, I believe, quite expensive to
    buy new.

    There are offboard USB controllers (not even all that expensive), to
    say nothing of hubs; so at least that part is manageable, especially
    for low-bandwidth devices like keyboards or mice.

    Probably a bigger problem would be the physical environment those
    people would be sitting in if you want to stay within the length limit
    of USB cables. For example, Wikipedia claims that USB 3 (which you'll
    almost certainly want if you're running video over USB) in practice
    tops out at somewhere around 3 m due to electrical properties; and
    even USB 1.1 and 2.0 are only specified for up to 5 m. Apparently USB gateways are a thing to extend this. In contrast, HDMI apparently is
    usable at up to about 13 m.

    Displayport also supposedly works up to 15 m, I believe. But video
    cards with Displayport or HDMI outputs are available, so that shouldn't
    be a problem.

    FWIW, I've run X windows across the Atlantic, so there shouldn't really
    be a limit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joe@21:1/5 to Roger Price on Mon Nov 11 19:20:01 2024
    On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 13:33:08 +0100 (CET)
    Roger Price <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Mon, 11 Nov 2024, brian mckee wrote:

    I have a work station.  
    If I put debian on it.
    I want it to have 5 monsters.

    I'm guessing 5 "monitors".

    5 key boards.
    5 mice.
    So 5 people can long in. At same time.

    I'm guessing "login". It's sometimes called Multi Seat.

    What Verizon should I download 

    I'm guessing "version". How about Debian 12 (bookworm). Have you
    read https://wiki.debian.org/Multi_Seat_Debian_HOWTO ?


    Have I missed it or has nobody yet asked what these five users will do?

    Just Email? Video editing? Something in between?

    If it's seriously heavy work, the 'workstation' needs to be a fairly
    powerful server, such as might run half a dozen Windows VMs, with lots
    of RAM and disc. If it's fairly lightweight to moderate, I'd use
    separate Raspberry Pis or similar. The beefier Pis will run a desktop
    fairly comfortably, for moderate office work. If this is about
    multi-user gaming, then the OP needs advice from people who do this kind
    of thing.

    --
    Joe

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Purgert@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon Nov 11 22:20:01 2024
    On Nov 11, 2024, [email protected] wrote:
    Greg Wooledge <[email protected]> wrote:
    On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 13:33:08 +0100, Roger Price wrote:
    I'm guessing "version". How about Debian 12 (bookworm). Have you
    read https://wiki.debian.org/Multi_Seat_Debian_HOWTO ?

    Oh. I've learned something today.

    I looked at that page and what I immediately learned is that it seems
    to have been written by a presumably young person who has forgotten or
    never knew the meaning of multi-user.

    Multiseat is one particular form of multiuser computer. There are
    lots of other forms. A computer where one person at a time uses it is
    called a single user computer. It is not a multi user computer.

    I read the article as not really counting a shared computer with
    multiple discrete users as quite "multi-user" beyond a nod of the head
    towards "yes, yes, I know multiple users are sharing one PC..."

    --
    |_|O|_|
    |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
    |O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE3asj+xn6fYUcweBnbWVw5UznKGAFAmcyc5QACgkQbWVw5Uzn KGCZUw//W1kYz+Jpr7d4TE1thnaHwsGErsRMiTJd7RtF9U6RZc2eGscLLPeGkyS1 6c0exj04d4RbF2h13bKED7bX/4H4xH76zm9uDIOG6/j3tnxH+bBoIgUsqg2cQCgD AYXp6Fam1nOFDPARD3CxZiZNId5Qo5PqNg3IhCjvkQ/NF6DyJPU/c83ZC0RszJOF 2nykK9IzVXuFJC9vxmWqtx4ztwMW+7w+J7uruusqpnS3+h3KHbvNDHxILsG1+rRr t76HsmLMnjcjPlGigY5j//6cKbVClPDHy38W9wVUoDL0XUVzDvYSj1GZ34DpJMdW qUGMMRi/V1+2V3BO4vyo1+qsZd71CXI4fvbKz9BzPQCoCEptKZ3W/K7n1lqxoUqW vgNS+LbIPcM9iMiHMr5jRmHYM/AqMpgL12jdUUWiGA4ohLEDvEm4UBxiXMcu9V3z bNzlhQoFJwT13Dkp/0W8kOJCpNIa/h4fLIswXgFJgspws3AU6yuinQ1sQsiCOhsA wcpJ99U+oxs+lX7rFy7vTiAmp4LUK9UX2/PKbeAg1gfRcb76pKWMDMZrBJgYYA7F gLpkg+V+T0yPXPJYK0foPt3vdEhjzW1uVRZ4HvgrN8zMPFyJU1qbP3w4oDAPQazN S/FbwrDhuFbiU3kBhjz9EBKtnW8fSIaHl57n0UGkFs7P82a14EE=
    =ce8E
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Us
  • From gene heskett@21:1/5 to Dan Purgert on Tue Nov 12 00:50:01 2024
    On 11/11/24 16:14, Dan Purgert wrote:
    On Nov 11, 2024, [email protected] wrote:
    Greg Wooledge <[email protected]> wrote:
    On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 13:33:08 +0100, Roger Price wrote:
    I'm guessing "version". How about Debian 12 (bookworm). Have you
    read https://wiki.debian.org/Multi_Seat_Debian_HOWTO ?

    Oh. I've learned something today.

    I looked at that page and what I immediately learned is that it seems
    to have been written by a presumably young person who has forgotten or
    never knew the meaning of multi-user.

    Or another possibility, Dan. Where he/she went to school, the profs were windows people. Quality of education. I don't have that limitation, the
    only windows machine I ever had was an early xp hp lappy cuz I needed a
    lappy and couldn't buy it anyway but with xp on it. It had Mndrake on it
    a week later. I came to computing by way of os9 level one on a 64k color computer, mulltitasking, and multiuser from the gitgo. "Can't" is not in
    my vocabulary. That is probably why I "paint myself into a corner" so often.


    Multiseat is one particular form of multiuser computer. There are
    lots of other forms. A computer where one person at a time uses it is
    called a single user computer. It is not a multi user computer.

    I read the article as not really counting a shared computer with
    multiple discrete users as quite "multi-user" beyond a nod of the head towards "yes, yes, I know multiple users are sharing one PC..."



    Cheers, Gene Heskett, CET.
    --
    "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
    soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
    -Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
    If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
    - Louis D. Brandeis

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From [email protected]@21:1/5 to Dan Purgert on Tue Nov 12 06:40:01 2024
    On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 04:13:59PM -0500, Dan Purgert wrote:
    On Nov 11, 2024, [email protected] wrote:

    [...]

    Multiseat is one particular form of multiuser computer. There are
    lots of other forms. A computer where one person at a time uses it is called a single user computer. It is not a multi user computer.

    I read the article as not really counting a shared computer with
    multiple discrete users as quite "multi-user" beyond a nod of the head towards "yes, yes, I know multiple users are sharing one PC..."

    I think the riddle over "multiseat" are desktop environments in Linux.

    Whereas Unix computers have been inherently multiuser from the get-go,
    when "big" DEs started in Linux, programmers started forgetting that;
    what constituted a "session" who had "the graphics card" (why can't you
    have two? why can't one serve two people)?.

    With multi-seat (ISTR the term originated at Redhat), people started
    to re-invent what a "user session" means. In a confusingly and quite irritatingly new manner, mind you. So you now (yay!) can have two Gnome sessions. But you pay the price that a Gnome session is quite a different
    beast from an X session, with an own DBUS thingy, an own Systemd
    thingy, yadda, yadda (same goes for KDE).

    Makes things far more obscure and less hackable.

    That's what we get when we mix branding, huge egos and commercial interests with free software. A monster (or a collection thereof ;-)

    Cheers
    --
    t

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCZzLptAAKCRAFyCz1etHa Rlz1AJ9BUC24WYVxFlnhAh57SQmjXnzIHwCggNfTDYRZK5I+1/jRhMjPnPxZAOA=
    =tVqp
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stefan Monnier@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 12 16:20:01 2024
    With multi-seat (ISTR the term originated at Redhat), people started
    to re-invent what a "user session" means. In a confusingly and quite irritatingly new manner, mind you. So you now (yay!) can have two Gnome sessions. But you pay the price that a Gnome session is quite a different beast from an X session, with an own DBUS thingy, an own Systemd
    thingy, yadda, yadda (same goes for KDE).

    AFAIK this is orthogonal to multi-seat, e.g. the above issues already
    arise with multiple concurrent logins on a single-seat setup, via virtual-consoles.

    Multi-seat issues have to do with the fact that monitors, keyboards,
    mouses, etc... are connected "separately", so from a hardware point of
    view there's no way for the machine to know which set of devices should
    be used together and which set corresponds to a "new seat".
    At least, not without extra manual configuration.

    Contrast this to the old TTY days where all the devices connected to
    a "seat" (monitor, keyboard, occasionally mouse, even sometimes
    printers) where physically connected together via a single serial port.

    [ Plus the fact that multiple monitors can be connected to the same
    graphics card, but if you want to use them in a "multi-seat" setup,
    they each want to run a separate Xorg server yet those servers need
    to share the graphics card, as you mentioned. ]


    Stefan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)