1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.USER

  • Testmail_3: Reply to one of the mails from The Wanderer

    From Hans@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 4 22:10:01 2024
    Surprisingly Testmail_2 appeared WITHOUT the SPAM tag.

    This one is a reply of a mail from The Wanderer.

    I expect it WITH the SPAM tag from the debian list.

    Hans

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hans@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 4 22:20:01 2024
    This ypou received NOT from the list was my fault - forgot to add the address in the To: field. Sorry

    Hans
    ...and the second copy which I received *not* via the list (which I'm assuming, but haven't verified, was sent by BCC or similar rather than
    being a separate unique mail), which I did not see before sending my
    previous reply, also had dkim=fail.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Wanderer@21:1/5 to The Wanderer on Thu Jul 4 22:20:02 2024
    This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
    On 2024-07-04 at 16:10, The Wanderer wrote:

    On 2024-07-04 at 16:07, Hans wrote:

    Surprisingly Testmail_2 appeared WITHOUT the SPAM tag.

    This one is a reply of a mail from The Wanderer.

    I expect it WITH the SPAM tag from the debian list.

    This one showed up on my end with dkim=fail in the usual header.

    ...and the second copy which I received *not* via the list (which I'm
    assuming, but haven't verified, was sent by BCC or similar rather than
    being a separate unique mail), which I did not see before sending my
    previous reply, also had dkim=fail.

    --
    The Wanderer

    The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
    persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all
    progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw


    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEJCOqsZEc2qVC44pUBKk1jTQoMmsFAmaHAioACgkQBKk1jTQo MmtL4A/8CAB3TJpfsx2iqhLiAu6TGJ41zom709zjyoTwsHDuHSrWhOUvi4flqFh2 8gBkiVkjpNBjNN3W4spf0qMY0NgX2YtP91+li/YTWgI1INbJInq/xSXAkL/oJ1fJ 924QoTWeWNunAPdt+y1vJEch/0QiquUGMPoOwTpeH3QDeIqiMe3Puvv1NHExZymh D2pD646x5Y3SVZW113TUST+L/XtyM/ipX7s6X/Gf+hVLOUmcHYk3SzOOUDJHk9GR EZGHhp35a2GTIQ4uyhNP+A1ax0nF3/L1NNG5xDHvfXSns/7OQeqY98X+hC4mmVbN VdR5NNHP2N/yBneXzalQE4ESD0xe14bvDoBEfcl4bH3IpoIlSbMpFARVSPyw9UXE VSNFMcDclGU2gZ3roqpGOoHOxyZu9+vqnyhfa0aIPE+2vHICnRVJHl8Z/XT4R5A7 biPSLXzng1oYvJn2VzQ65cad6hwNHsb1wEJpWye0FRnUwkGvdy6jGr1V819Oe2dk h1s8VtXlQeB5Y3XExl5K/8FC1C0sI6CRb3a1ZzdLQXaI9eaVlLs6l7yLFzw0gmep QhvuPa/IFVP/z7S8b/SXJ7MvHw5GTrk3lsh1DcfNKNbLA2DB12Rax8bfYsvN2xuJ 4VZQabCj6Vh9KnCpRpt5lu1eZ1fa
  • From The Wanderer@21:1/5 to Hans on Thu Jul 4 22:20:01 2024
    This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
    On 2024-07-04 at 16:07, Hans wrote:

    Surprisingly Testmail_2 appeared WITHOUT the SPAM tag.

    This one is a reply of a mail from The Wanderer.

    I expect it WITH the SPAM tag from the debian list.

    This one showed up on my end with dkim=fail in the usual header.

    --
    The Wanderer

    The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
    persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all
    progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw


    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEJCOqsZEc2qVC44pUBKk1jTQoMmsFAmaHAdAACgkQBKk1jTQo Mmvx4Q//RJRsSwRgGONq8K8dTVeGQde1qKMU3fmJfDbYz1kxEnoMwKJelSmAIlsz 3CAfbwDfOnT2ZprR85S/QCN1pYAFB/JoUqevZ8LvKOnHYyOBM49recPcIw4VQGDM R/NPrQ/n4Iompd6MHV7lgGBwHxpCdkwUxIQ651HQVBjXAYUl6yiBwEZ23zqiUYW1 Yia/NmyyBx3vQm7w33VLEXoU8qIUYUeQdUYwNwm/7b689aZY15ctAfB5LtN7v22B SlBpB5s2rdXvRSDU10TYYKOP1ZxG4wAgi3/E5wmutGOq5HECjTXq60tgC9E8MI3M 9VQrm2C0Sb7UBcR0eW4H/UOPF8jHFrDXgx5d8nTOhMVHmsDTZFPoyTdb1tACoFON l8fMDnkwx/7nay08V2JmWOw7yKmrBMNCpYCKQMs6wOiYjKGC4fjnH1kmYBwVJQy3 pBdjtDkTczSK6SfJ061KCcDt3mtfz9x9FQXtWwi2oCVHmwYPbWlPidU1XmGHX7gg 5ljtUrbKyQs/uVkp43s8yunGujeFnPIVMAi/UBuAT6nee6bniCu7lrjBdSSMbUpP 5/t4FCWGtJPcwQuf8sGRG2lgH3f6TtC97RtwYPBliia4Pji3qBgNWh3KUgMGxKM9 99my2RJnszfgAN2aXGZdBUlr88HM
  • From Hans@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 4 22:30:01 2024
    Yes, I saw the DKIM=fail at the first time, but debian said, it is the fault
    of megamailservers.eu and theire servers are ok.

    So I contacted megamailservers.eu today, but generally I can do nothing else myself, as I am no admin of any involved mailservers.

    So, hopefully they will answer.

    IMO something is wrong, or let's say, soemthing is not working as I expect it.

    At the moment I have no further clue. So, we will wait. Lets stop for now.

    But thanks for the help and your time!

    Best

    Hans

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)