Forum: >>> Magnum BBS <<<

This is a testmail!

From Hans@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 4 13:20:01 2024

Hi folks,

this is a testmail, because I got some trouble with the mailingist. As
reported before, I get all ,mails from [email protected] with
tagged with *****SPAM**** added to the subject. This is because of some DKIM failure, as reported before. As I could fix this by setting a special rule for this mailaddresse in spamassassin, I know dicovered another issue.

When I am sending a mail to the list, it looks like the subject is completely replaced with only "*****SPAM*****".

I would like to know, when this happens. Either during the transfer from me to the debian server, or when it is sent from the debian server to me.

This mail has the subject "This is a testmail!".

It would be nice, if someone could tell me, if this mail is tagged with "****SPAM****" somewhere and if the subject is removed or not.

This behaviour appeared suddenly several months ago and I do not know, what, might have changed since then.

Thank you for your help.

Best regards

Hans

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

From The Wanderer@21:1/5 to Hans on Thu Jul 4 13:30:02 2024

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
On 2024-07-04 at 07:14, Hans wrote:

Hi folks,

this is a testmail, because I got some trouble with the mailingist.
As reported before, I get all ,mails from
[email protected] with tagged with *****SPAM**** added to
the subject. This is because of some DKIM failure, as reported
before. As I could fix this by setting a special rule for this
mailaddresse in spamassassin, I know dicovered another issue.

When I am sending a mail to the list, it looks like the subject is
completely replaced with only "*****SPAM*****".

I have not noticed this, but I'll admit that I have not been reading
every thread, so it's possible it might have been in the depths of a
thread which I was not reading.

I would like to know, when this happens. Either during the transfer
from me to the debian server, or when it is sent from the debian
server to me.

This mail has the subject "This is a testmail!".

It would be nice, if someone could tell me, if this mail is tagged
with "****SPAM****" somewhere

It does not appear to be, unless these occurrences of that string in the
*body* of the message count.

and if the subject is removed or not.

It was not. I have not, that I'm aware of, seen that happen.

Also, looking at the message headers, I see what appear to be multiple indications that DKIM validation passed.

--
The Wanderer

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all
progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEJCOqsZEc2qVC44pUBKk1jTQoMmsFAmaGhxkACgkQBKk1jTQo Mmun2RAApQFaTOPjN1xYhC96+aUUDXlXWbmj8EE/KFHIx5k03Kb7tue+wXHvE1z4 xcu+tr2XI/MBnjdq9/m5E1BN8DXUZBFBOXEhdsjpTzrRZAwpLFLPx/l15mSRth0e AKptv7zeXStRcGKoccbfsRY1RnAfQiGbpkDCsQsaeK16Gv4DArkjw9uaFdwSe7HK 81NTaYPW/P/4Kv5vzL9KXXoY+T88TBzFCXdqncgpnHzyCvs0xO3sd9MtCX6G01pr 2v36RlDsAjpRIwXJH6MwBetVuc0ywMAA30/etTqZoGtwFsvP1TESdf84ZcMcMZ9z 5eWb9R+yRFbXp3HIVJRjVCh7FIEWdVKplvOw0mzsE7jFWcXbGgGGszchiTtVld7w Is9Tp579rPhSgbkWBU3+7ZOPIcU4IEjovkLLhkceY9OHhrynqJPbLrhXmuLgKe+f Tmj54kwHXIHT5DXFthWUKrZv0qjU7T0NW49ypf0Tq26XaRCKFxtx+aj7e2bo2+dP oFU4VMSq7ujsjk6nvj8cOdTZDjahPD4UAQM71UE+iAwoRnh45M3iWZrQ4sADDzwe VNdScFFVLsUXLXS73YuPpdQtspKg2XK0zUxza+BYjt0LuDIj44a2izN4LmIVMNwe NTvP9gI7gcT1gJEs6Lt/zPPTNwON

From CToID@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 4 13:50:02 2024

Subject and the content LGTM.
--
Best,
ID

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

From Roger Price@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 4 14:10:01 2024

Hi, this what I received from you. Cheers, Roger

Return-path: <bounce-debian-user=debian=[email protected]> Envelope-to: rprice@localhost
Delivery-date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 13:17:06 +0200
Received: from [::1] (helo=titan.rogerprice.org)
by titan with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2)
(envelope-from <bounce-debian-user=debian=[email protected]>)
id 1sPKSX-000BB5-QT
for rprice@localhost; Thu, 04 Jul 2024 13:17:06 +0200
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from mail.gandi.net [2001:4b98:e00::9]
by titan.rogerprice.org with POP3 (fetchmail-6.4.16)
for <rprice@localhost> (single-drop); Thu, 04 Jul 2024 13:17:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bendel.debian.org (bendel.debian.org [82.195.75.100])
by spool.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7284F74003A
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
id BE07320671; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:15:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Mailbox-Line: From [email protected] Thu Jul 4 11:15:21 2024
Old-Return-Path: <[email protected]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on bendel.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
FOURLA,LDOSUBSCRIBER,LDO_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable
autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Original-To: [email protected]
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A68D2065E
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:15:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3
tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1,
LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from bendel.debian.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (lists.debian.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 2525)
with ESMTP id ujzTpCms6YZb for <[email protected]>;
Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:15:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-policyd-weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 HELO_IP_IN_CL_SUBNET=-1.2 (check
from: .loop. - helo: .mail37c50.megamailservers. - helo-domain: .megamailservers.)
FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -4.7
Received: from mail37c50.megamailservers.eu (mail176c50.megamailservers.eu [91.136.10.186])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C3472064E
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:15:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Authenticated-User: [email protected]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu;
s=maildub; t=1720091705;
bh=NFdZXTvtPi7RA/43aM6v1rxa6iP8uBGeXo/HBz7i/x4=;
h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
b=Kt+u3inWKlgqA2fwE41IKx3r2P0umac0jZx2CxYqKJ4sQmJNmTPoc9qvtr1Bqa9/k
nvkFOMxcBLmvCKWsrYNf1bcOIaV+Zs2LeG1pwbfyBlCfXwrYxaRRSBLodzICVqw8G3
8YbVywtnmnf7DSK/o1SSLXDHCt+1m1pCdNs+n9l0=
Feedback-ID:hans.ullrich@lo
Received: from protheus2.localnet (a89-183-193-109.net-htp.de [89.183.193.109])
(authenticated bits=0)
by mail37c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 464BEwoJ032290
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:15:00 +0000
From: Hans <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: This is a testmail!
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 13:14:58 +0200
Message-ID: <3645068.R56niFO833@protheus2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean
X-VADE-SPAMSCORE: 0
X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE:

gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudelgdefiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfjqffuvffqrffktedpqfgfvfdpgffpggdqveehtdenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjug

hrpefhvffufffkggfgtgesthfuredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepjfgrnhhsuceohhgrnhhsrdhulhhlrhhitghhsehlohhophdruggvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeefvdevhedvgffffefgveffieefveffueetuedtleef

veettdfhleejffegkeejffenucfkphepkeelrddukeefrdduleefrddutdelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepkeelrddukeefrdduleefrddutdelpdhhvghlohepphhrohhthhgvuh

hsvddrlhhotggrlhhnvghtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhephhgrnhhsrdhulhhlrhhitghhsehlohhophdruggvpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedupdhrtghpthhtohepuggvsghirghnqdhushgvrheslhhishhtshdruggvsghirghn
rdhorhhg
X-Rspamd-Status: No, score=0.90
X-Rspamd-Result: default: False [0.90 / 6.00];
CTE_CASE(0.50)[];
MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[];
MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
ASN(0.00)[asn:13045, ipnet:89.183.0.0/16, country:DE];
FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];
MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[];
MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
ARC_NA(0.00)[];
RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0];
TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[];
SUBJECT_ENDS_EXCLAIM(0.00)[]
X-Origin-Country: DE
X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01
Resent-Message-ID: <aPazZYmiIEL.A.hsPJ.JRohmB@bendel>
Resent-From: [email protected]
X-Mailing-List: <[email protected]> archive/latest/812904
X-Loop: [email protected]
List-Id: <debian-user.lists.debian.org>
List-URL: <https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [email protected]
List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/3645068.R56niFO833@protheus2
Resent-Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:15:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-GND-Status: LEGIT
Authentication-Results: spool.mail.gandi.net;
dkim=pass header.d=megamailservers.eu header.s=maildub header.b=Kt+u3inW;
dmarc=none;
spf=none (spool.mail.gandi.net: domain of "bounce-debian-user=debian=[email protected]" has no SPF policy when checking 82.195.75.100)
smtp.mailfrom="bounce-debian-user=debian=[email protected]"

Hi folks,

this is a testmail, because I got some trouble with the mailingist. As
reported before, I get all ,mails from [email protected] with
tagged with *****SPAM**** added to the subject. This is because of some DKIM failure, as reported before. As I could fix this by setting a special rule for this mailaddresse in spamassassin, I know dicovered another issue.

When I am sending a mail to the list, it looks like the subject is completely replaced with only "*****SPAM*****".

I would like to know, when this happens. Either during the transfer from me to the debian server, or when it is sent from the debian server to me.

This mail has the subject "This is a testmail!".

It would be nice, if someone could tell me, if this mail is tagged with "****SPAM****" somewhere and if the subject is removed or not.

This behaviour appeared suddenly several months ago and I do not know, what, might have changed since then.

Thank you for your help.

Best regards

Hans

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

From Hans@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 4 14:00:01 2024

Hmm, this is strange. Maybe I wrote my testmail from scratch.

This one is a reply as it have been, when the issue appeared.

Strangely my own testmail appeared without the SPAM tag this time.

Maybe there is a difference, if I am using a reply mail.

I will watch this and search for more information.

Hope, not everyone is replying now, only one feedback is enough.

Thanks for help though.

Best

Hans

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

From Roger Price@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 4 14:30:01 2024

My apologies for flooding the list with what should have been a private mailing. Roger

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

From Hans@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 4 14:30:01 2024

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

Me again, sorry.

Now I got my last mail back with the spam tag!

Subject:
Re: *****SPAM***** [SOLVED] Re: This is a testmail!

This is the header:

--------------------
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-SPAM-FACTOR: DKIM
X-Envelope-From: bounce-debian-user=hans.ullrich=[email protected] DMARC-Filter:
OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail39c50.megamailservers.eu 464C5Iek122979 Authentication-Results: mail39c50.megamailservers.eu;
dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=loop.de
Authentication-Results: mail39c50.megamailservers.eu;
spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.debian.org
Authentication-Results: mail39c50.megamailservers.eu;
dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key)
header.d=megamailservers.eu [email protected] header.b="QLjumGn/" Return-Path: <bounce-debian-user=hans.ullrich=[email protected]> Received:
from bendel.debian.org (bendel.debian.org [82.195.75.100]) by
mail39c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 464C5Iek122979 for
<[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:05:21 +0000
Received:
from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with
QMQP id EA3E420682; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:05:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-Mailbox-Line:
From [email protected] Thu Jul 4 12:05:15 2024 Old-Return-Path: <[email protected]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on bendel.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.5 required=4.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
FOURLA,KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS,LDOSUBSCRIBER,LDO_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable
autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Original-To: [email protected]
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received:
from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with
ESMTP id C18E42067A for <[email protected]>; Thu,
4 Jul 2024 12:05:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No,
score=-6.301 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2,
DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FOURLA=0.1, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399,
LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received:
from bendel.debian.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lists.debian.org
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 2525) with ESMTP id CNGEsE8xgvQ4 for
<[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:05:03 +0000 (UTC) X-policyd-weight:
NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 HELO_IP_IN_CL_SUBNET=-1.2 (check from: .loop. -
helo: .mail194c50.megamailservers. - helo-domain: .megamailservers.)
FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -4.7
Received:
from mail194c50.megamailservers.eu (mail208c50.megamailservers.eu
[91.136.10.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384
(256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by bendel.debian.org
(Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC67D20677 for <[email protected]>; Thu,
4 Jul 2024 12:05:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Authenticated-User: [email protected]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu;
s=maildub; t=1720094700; bh=5Um9/MplAQNd+svZJOunmBGElnorPOi9odLzGqxgObQ=;
h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
b=QLjumGn/60xFVhN9BUbajEg0uTOZxqi/Uz8jodz7E1EE2Hi7W3VtjJFW4LGmbJGnC
Lt7Nym0B3iEmO+1/fxpnDfmt1lRnzu+Q65akTEd8eaEHbj8G7yo5OCpI4oVjRr7q9o
pn0upeaUIrxnepbAwXeozeebIuTSx2zuaH0xvL30=
Feedback-ID: hans.ullrich@lo
Received:
from protheus2.localnet (a89-183-193-109.net-htp.de [89.183.193.109])
(authenticated bits=0) by mail194c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with
ESMTP id 464C4rxR025870 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3
cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for
<[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:04:55 +0000
From: Hans <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: *****SPAM***** [SOLVED] Re: This is a testmail!
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 14:04:53 +0200
Message-ID: <2408526.NG923GbCHz@protheus2>
In-Reply-To: <46505217.fMDQidcC6G@protheus2>
References:
<3645068.R56niFO833@protheus2> <[email protected]>
<46505217.fMDQidcC6G@protheus2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean
X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean
X-VADE-SPAMSCORE: 0
X-VADE-SPAMSCORE: 0
X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE:
gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudelgdegiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgem
ucfjqffuvffqrffktedpgffpggdqveehtdenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjgh
fggfgtgejudeftdfjphegsehtufertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefjrghnshcuoehhrghnshdruhhllhhrihgthhesl
hhoohhprdguvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephfdvudekheefueevieelgefftdfhtedvlefgfefhieevveejud
elhffhleethfeknecukfhppeekvddrudelhedrjeehrddutddtpdekledrudekfedrudelfedruddtleenucevlhh
ushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpeekvddrudelhedrjeehrddutddtpdhhvghlohepsg
gvnhguvghlrdguvggsihgrnhdrohhrghdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegsohhunhgtvgdquggvsghirghnqdhus
hgvrhephhgrnhhsrdhulhhlrhhitghhpehlohhophdruggvsehlihhsthhsrdguvggsihgrnhdrohhrghdpnhg
spghrtghpthhtohepuddprhgtphhtthhopehhrghnshdruhhllhhrihgthheslhhoohhprdguvg X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE:
gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudelgdegjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgem
ucfjqffuvffqrffktedpqfgfvfdpgffpggdqveehtdenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjughrpefhvf
fufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepjfgrnhhsuceohhgrnhhsrdhulhhlrhhitghhsehlohho
phdruggvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeefvdethfeludejieeljeeugefgieekheeitdfggfehuedvvdfhjedute
ekkedtvdenucfkphepkeelrddukeefrdduleefrddutdelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrgh
mpehinhgvthepkeelrddukeefrdduleefrddutdelpdhhvghlohepphhrohhthhgvuhhsvddrlhhotggrlhhnv
ghtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhephhgrnhhsrdhulhhlrhhitghhsehlohhophdruggvpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhope
dupdhrtghpthhtohepuggvsghirghnqdhushgvrheslhhishhtshdruggvsghirghnrdhorhhg X-Rspamd-Status: No, score=1.59
X-Rspamd-Result: default: False [1.59 / 6.00];
R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[megamailservers.eu:s=maildub]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[];
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>Me again, sorry.
 
Now I got my last mail back with the spam tag! 
 
Subject: 
Re: *****SPAM***** [SOLVED] Re: This is a testmail!
 
This is the header:
 
<hr />
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-SPAM-FACTOR: DKIM
X-Envelope-From: bounce-debian-user=hans.ullrich=[email protected]
DMARC-Filter:
 OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail39c50.megamailservers.eu 464C5Iek122979
Authentication-Results: mail39c50.megamailservers.eu;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=loop.de
Authentication-Results: mail39c50.megamailservers.eu;
 spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.debian.org
Authentication-Results: mail39c50.megamailservers.eu;
 dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key)
 header.d=megamailservers.eu [email protected] header.b="QLjumGn/"
Return-Path: <bounce-debian-user=hans.ullrich=[email protected]>
Received:
 from bendel.debian.org (bendel.debian.org [82.195.75.100]) by
 mail39c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 464C5Iek122979 for
 <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:05:21 +0000
Received:
 from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with
 QMQP id EA3E420682; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:05:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-Mailbox-Line:
 From [email protected] Thu Jul 4 12:05:15 2024
Old-Return-Path: <[email protected]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on bendel.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.5 required=4.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
 FOURLA,KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS,LDOSUBSCRIBER,LDO_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable
 autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Original-To: [email protected]
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received:
 from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with
 ESMTP id C18E42067A for <[email protected]>; Thu,
 4 Jul 2024 12:05:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No,
 score=-6.301 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2,
 DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FOURLA=0.1, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399,
 LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received:
 from bendel.debian.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lists.debian.org
 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
 port 2525) with ESMTP id CNGEsE8xgvQ4 for
 <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:05:03 +0000 (UTC)
X-policyd-weight:
 NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 HELO_IP_IN_CL_SUBNET=-1.2 (check from: .loop. -
 helo: .mail194c50.megamailservers. - helo-domain: .megamailservers.) 
 FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -4.7
Received:
 from mail194c50.megamailservers.eu (mail208c50.megamailservers.eu
 [91.136.10.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384
 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by bendel.debian.org
 (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC67D20677 for <[email protected]>; Thu,
 4 Jul 2024 12:05:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Authenticated-User: [email protected]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu;
 s=maildub; t=1720094700; bh=5Um9/MplAQNd+svZJOunmBGElnorPOi9odLzGqxgObQ=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=QLjumGn/60xFVhN9BUbajEg0uTOZxqi/Uz8jodz7E1EE2Hi7W3VtjJFW4LGmbJGnC
 Lt7Nym0B3iEmO+1/fxpnDfmt1lRnzu+Q65akTEd8eaEHbj8G7yo5OCpI4oVjRr7q9o
 pn0upeaUIrxnepbAwXeozeebIuTSx2zuaH0xvL30=
Feedback-ID: hans.ullrich@lo
Received:
 from protheus2.localnet (a89-183-193-109.net-htp.de [89.183.193.109])
 (authenticated bits=0) by mail194c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with
 ESMTP id 464C4rxR025870 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3
 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for
 <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:04:55 +0000
From: Hans <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: *****SPAM***** [SOLVED] Re: This is a testmail!
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 14:04:53 +0200
Message-ID: <2408526.NG923GbCHz@protheus2>
In-Reply-To: <46505217.fMDQidcC6G@protheus2>
References:
 <3645068.R56niFO833@protheus2> <[email protected]>
 <46505217.fMDQidcC6G@protheus2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean
X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean
X-VADE-SPAMSCORE: 0
X-VADE-SPAMSCORE: 0
X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE:
 gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudelgdegiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfjqffuvffqrffktedpgffpggdqveehtdenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgejudeftdfjphegsehtufertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefjrghnshcuoehhrghnshdruhh
llhhrihgthheslhhoohhprdguvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephfdvudekheefueevieelgefftdfhtedvlefgfefhieevveejudelhffhleethfeknecukfhppeekvddrudelhedrjeehrddutddtpdekledrudekfedrudelfedruddtleenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpeekvddrudelhedrje
ehrddutddtpdhhvghlohepsggvnhguvghlrdguvggsihgrnhdrohhrghdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegsohhunhgtvgdquggvsghirghnqdhushgvrhephhgrnhhsrdhulhhlrhhitghhpehlohhophdruggvsehlihhsthhsrdguvggsihgrnhdrohhrghdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddprhgtphhtthhopehhrghnshdruhhllhhrihgthhesl
hhoohhprdguvg
X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE:
 gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudelgdegjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfjqffuvffqrffktedpqfgfvfdpgffpggdqveehtdenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepjfgrnhhsuceohhgrnhhsrdhulhhlrhh
itghhsehlohhophdruggvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeefvdethfeludejieeljeeugefgieekheeitdfggfehuedvvdfhjeduteekkedtvdenucfkphepkeelrddukeefrdduleefrddutdelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepkeelrddukeefrdduleefrddutdelpdhhvghlohepphhrohhthh
gvuhhsvddrlhhotggrlhhnvghtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhephhgrnhhsrdhulhhlrhhitghhsehlohhophdruggvpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedupdhrtghpthhtohepuggvsghirghnqdhushgvrheslhhishhtshdruggvsghirghnrdhorhhg
X-Rspamd-Status: No, score=1.59
X-Rspamd-Result: default: False [1.59 / 6.00];
 R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[megamailservers.eu:s=maildub]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[];
 MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[generic];
 MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(-0.10)[82.195.75.100:from];
 RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[82.195.75.100:from];
 HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[];
 FORWARDED(0.00)[[email protected]];
 DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[megamailservers.eu:-]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
 ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 FORGED_RECIPIENTS(0.00)[m:[email protected],s:[email protected]];
 DMARC_NA(0.00)[loop.de]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[];
 FORGED_SENDER(0.00)[[email protected],bounce-debian-user=hans.ullrich=[email protected]];
 R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 FORGED_SENDER_FORWARDING(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5];
 FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[[email protected],bounce-debian-user=hans.ullrich=[email protected]];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[];
 FORGED_SENDER_VERP_SRS(0.00)[]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_FORWARDING(0.00)[];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:8365, ipnet:82.195.64.0/19, country:DE];
 FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_EXCLAIM(0.00)[]
X-Origin-Country: DE
X-Origin-Country: DE
X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01
Resent-Message-ID: <X8XMuV4H5dC.A.2f6J.7_ohmB@bendel>
Resent-From: [email protected]
X-Mailing-List: <[email protected]> archive/latest/812910
X-Loop: [email protected]
List-Id: <debian-user.lists.debian.org>
List-URL: <https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:
 <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe:
 <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [email protected]
List-Archive:
 https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/2408526.NG923GbCHz@protheus2
Resent-Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:05:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-DA-Pass: W0T0
X-WHL: LR
 
Am Donnerstag, 4. Juli 2024, 13:58:07 CEST schrieb Hans:
Answering myself: 
 
At the moment everything is looking fine.
 
Maybe after the big issue yesterday, the mail admins somewhere in the world 
have fixed the problem? Dunno. Whatever, strange..... 
 
I will watch this in the future.
 
Let's close this issue for now, so that this list is not too much filled with 
unusefull spam. 
 
However, if this issue appears again, I will allow myself to ask again for 
help. 
Thank you all for your quick response!
 
Best regards
 
Hans 
> Hmm, this is strange. Maybe I wrote my testmail from scratch.
> > This one is a reply as it have been, when the issue appeared.
> > Strangely my own testmail appeared without the SPAM tag this time.
> > Maybe there is a difference, if I am using a reply mail.
> > I will watch this and search for more information.
> > Hope, not everyone is replying now, only one feedback is enough.
> > Thanks for help though.
> > Best
> > Hans
 
<hr />
 
Looks like it is some DKIM problem. Maybe this is related to, which way my mail goes.
 However, let us close this issue for now. There is even no way, I myself can fix this. I suppose, if Debian admins are responsible, they might read here or may not. But all in
all, as I can do nothing, this issue is closed for me.
 Happy hacking!
 Hans
  
</body>
</html>

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

From Thomas Hochstein@21:1/5 to Hans on Thu Jul 4 19:20:02 2024

Hans wrote:

Now I got my last mail back with the spam tag!

That's very surprising.

X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-SPAM-FACTOR: DKIM
Authentication-Results: mail39c50.megamailservers.eu;
dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key)
header.d=megamailservers.eu [email protected] header.b="QLjumGn/"

I have absolutely no idea where that spam flag may be coming from.
It's a mystery.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

From The Wanderer@21:1/5 to Thomas Hochstein on Thu Jul 4 21:00:02 2024

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
On 2024-07-04 at 12:59, Thomas Hochstein wrote:

Hans wrote:

Now I got my last mail back with the spam tag!

That's very surprising.

X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-SPAM-FACTOR: DKIM
Authentication-Results: mail39c50.megamailservers.eu;
dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key)
header.d=megamailservers.eu [email protected] header.b="QLjumGn/"

I have absolutely no idea where that spam flag may be coming from.
It's a mystery.

Perhaps even more interestingly, I see the following, in the ARC-Authentication-Results header in three mails from Hans in this
thread. (This is not the same as the Authentication-Results header, such
as you quoted, of which there appear to be four in each mail.)

The one which was sent as a reply to my mail has:

dkim=pass (1024-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=megamailservers.eu
[email protected] header.b=QOWbQzHX header.a=rsa-sha256
header.s=maildub

The one with the [SOLVED] tag, which was a reply to the previous, has:

dkim=fail (message has been altered, 1024-bit rsa key sha256)
header.d=megamailservers.eu [email protected]
header.b=QLjumGn/ header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=maildub

The one you were replying to has:

dkim=fail (message has been altered, 1024-bit rsa key sha256)
header.d=megamailservers.eu [email protected]
header.b=r8P8m4Og header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=maildub

Perhaps interestingly (or perhaps not), that last one appears to be
multipart MIME (one part with HTML and one part plain-text), whereas the
other two appear to be plain-text-only.

(I am not entirely certain which mail is the one from which Hans quoted
a set of headers. Those headers include a Subject: line with the
[SOLVED] tag, of which I've received only one message thus far via the
list in this thread; however, the headers in that mail as I received it
do not appear to *remotely* match the ones Hans quoted, enough so that I
am not confident of them being the same message. If they are, then that
might narrow down the places where the failure could be being
introduced.)

So we have three at least visible scenarios in just this thread: plain
text with DKIM pass, plain text with DKIM fail, and multipart MIME with
DKIM fail.

Hans, are you certain you composed those three messages the same way,
using the same interface of the same program, and sent them the same
way?

--
The Wanderer

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all
progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEJCOqsZEc2qVC44pUBKk1jTQoMmsFAmaG8IYACgkQBKk1jTQo MmvJkhAAqvV83A9ej3Jy+Fe1gYCJnjw9jSFuQIbM2OuDtX55tiHM8R0H7BI9cYhw zwUT5B+mV5TpjLfDk4RyLZk7MwWwjpYWToXOhJvttgoi2gcT3CFI4dWau3XhfMoQ OVZf5SbJT5107vQH77Q8OvKqPNcHfO1Iqschzlx3trZTOnXQv91G3SJ1F/iM/2TH 7xmSrzQAH1RKSj8rJuIu2K+rAxSxsyUoGwkyn3QF8Q7aszFy//RevirUJRG5zuEi eIWe47RS/adqdwzcxLWvOPmpvk01pnWatKRQR15feq9r3V4QQtdMgMRqSGF2x3Zc tpNSUDpyj4pohw7AqRTICv5ZOjMmwSjfJ9jjckdurQ/04d2vvECv13RAuY0JHIxJ 1HQQSsPqvXb46OEnudPk95+TpWg78791pPWpOKkiOPSDQ/ecB9U8VWKroiCjaR34 aAca7tPVuYgD0Jwu7jqJx7A0WZS3qZfWXWO9py+gNoKDW7FNKkueQnDgj0D406uI paDd/FF/UEG6ulzfluRdUhT7/LFL/SOPoCl5eR5cgcJ0QKTV+MTiOg8KYj8QiwHg Bs5X2+ipXs9SITQoI+A6w8Dvi6AJnYAme7z2BvUjX18rgbvGRWr3wmwU8qIjg78E BRPJEQaibexnV/NZdgn2jAAF+KB7

From The Wanderer@21:1/5 to Hans on Thu Jul 4 21:40:02 2024

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
On 2024-07-04 at 15:25, Hans wrote:

Hi The Wanderer,

Hans, are you certain you composed those three messages the same
way, using the same interface of the same program, and sent them
the same way?

No, the first mail was created natively (= a new mail),

To clarify: the mail I listed first was the one which you wrote as a
reply to me, not the mail with which you started this thread. So both
that *and* the one after it were replies, but the one got a pass and the
other didn't.

the one with the "[SOLVED] in the subject was a reply to someones
mail from the list and the last mail was also a reply this time of my
of my own.

It looks like replying to soemone (my normal behaviour) is causing
this issue.

Except that the reply to my previous message did not get the issue.

(FWIW, your most recent reply - which is also a reply to a mail from me
- does have the "DKIM fail" header information.)

And it looks like, that I am getting the SPAM tag, not you.

That much does seem to be the case, yes.

Some minutes ago I informed megamailservers.eu of my problem and sent
them the mail with the headers, i sent here, too.

Hopefully I will get some response.

The strange thing is,this issue suddenly apeared from nowhere. I have
nothing changed here (except of upgrades). I am running debian
bookworm and my mail client is kmail. But that should not be the
problem.

I do agree that, as I think I've seen suggested in previous threads, the
most likely culprit here is your mail provider having changed something. Hopefully the inquiry you've started with them will bear fruit; if it
does not, you may want to look into changing providers. (I can recommend Fastmail, for whatever that's worth.)

--
The Wanderer

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all
progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEJCOqsZEc2qVC44pUBKk1jTQoMmsFAmaG+hAACgkQBKk1jTQo MmspPQ//SsntSxu2voOfJFoX4hdTst9NWAbZdmJbJTUR26y4ltYs/1Mq25+TH0bd s39D/JyuKdc0rX9CY7TUmsuImD5RC8v6HeF1XT560l1eO0kapiyL5yHygvBos9uU V1rZj3sFk0czU6D1spZFsOtFLIjEdmrOcPPXL6RgCL8809B16F9Bubo9OISi8FzT gy5vYzH+PUBD/bAsH0IQpaWW/Sng82zeD+qJWsPxKtFixxQn+lLtKDMqU3oxqB3d 3iKyI6KWvofWaoswXwQysKn692IHgKJ+ylQZ9JAw+hXnFnsceg//WQhY7rvJ0H6V HsUvCzdCkUsP3CL6AsplVOb4EJV2fAZ9zupZUpB9KlcxbvHr7swH2hYof5KyP6N/ LMP8vVtmXsuwB5HtBh1x/Xtqq3C53XP8cqx0teBefY8BSdW2tM9qetivH/evXMb9 nntJtXfrCePLb3uJycLK/ZaDCPW41hlkkzda7pA3apMB0C3ZiLSLhYF6CM4Tst5D ERH+Xg1IZcRW46FC9xzMuEiwRlCxs9SPMU+zXMqxzoE4Byxw5X0kVZy4ry336IYH P8D+pauvJ0bR9Aw1b2vsfjc8hQEsHBttNckP+KWhg1IIf+AV8C0DJkX3hPlr3L9U IkSEEXmmFtPvEcx5K2oo+i+js3x9

From Hans@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 4 21:30:03 2024

Hi The Wanderer,

Hans, are you certain you composed those three messages the same way,
using the same interface of the same program, and sent them the same
way?

No, the first mail was created natively (= a new mail), the one with the "[SOLVED] in the subject was a reply to someones mail from the list and the last mail was also a reply this time of my of my own.

It looks like replying to soemone (my normal behaviour) is causing this issue. And it looks like, that I am getting the SPAM tag, not you.

Some minutes ago I informed megamailservers.eu of my problem and sent them the mail with the headers, i sent here, too.

Hopefully I will get some response.

The strange thing is,this issue suddenly apeared from nowhere. I have nothing changed here (except of upgrades). I am running debian bookworm and my mail client is kmail. But that should not be the problem.

Best

Hans

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

From Detlef Vollmann@21:1/5 to Hans on Thu Jul 4 23:00:02 2024

Isn't this the usual DKIM problem with lists?
The From: has @loop.de, but the sender and DKIM signature
is from lists.debian.org.

That's why most lists these days rewrite the From: header.

Detlef

On 7/4/24 14:24, Hans wrote:

Me again, sorry.

Now I got my last mail back with the spam tag!

Subject:
Re: *****SPAM***** [SOLVED] Re: This is a testmail!

This is the header:

--------------------
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-SPAM-FACTOR: DKIM
X-Envelope-From: bounce-debian-user=hans.ullrich=[email protected] DMARC-Filter:
OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail39c50.megamailservers.eu 464C5Iek122979 Authentication-Results: mail39c50.megamailservers.eu;
dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=loop.de
Authentication-Results: mail39c50.megamailservers.eu;
spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.debian.org
Authentication-Results: mail39c50.megamailservers.eu;
dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key)
header.d=megamailservers.eu [email protected] header.b="QLjumGn/"
Return-Path: <bounce-debian-user=hans.ullrich=[email protected]> Received:
from bendel.debian.org (bendel.debian.org [82.195.75.100]) by
mail39c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 464C5Iek122979 for
<[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:05:21 +0000
Received:
from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with
QMQP id EA3E420682; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:05:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-Mailbox-Line:
From [email protected] Thu Jul 4 12:05:15 2024 Old-Return-Path: <[email protected]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on bendel.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.5 required=4.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
FOURLA,KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS,LDOSUBSCRIBER,LDO_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable
autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Original-To: [email protected]
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received:
from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with
ESMTP id C18E42067A for <[email protected]>; Thu,
4 Jul 2024 12:05:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No,
score=-6.301 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2,
DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FOURLA=0.1, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399,
LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received:
from bendel.debian.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lists.debian.org
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 2525) with ESMTP id CNGEsE8xgvQ4 for
<[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:05:03 +0000 (UTC)
X-policyd-weight:
NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 HELO_IP_IN_CL_SUBNET=-1.2 (check from: .loop. -
helo: .mail194c50.megamailservers. - helo-domain: .megamailservers.)
FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -4.7
Received:
from mail194c50.megamailservers.eu (mail208c50.megamailservers.eu
[91.136.10.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384
(256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by bendel.debian.org
(Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC67D20677 for <[email protected]>; Thu,
4 Jul 2024 12:05:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Authenticated-User: [email protected]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu;
s=maildub; t=1720094700; bh=5Um9/MplAQNd+svZJOunmBGElnorPOi9odLzGqxgObQ=;
h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
b=QLjumGn/60xFVhN9BUbajEg0uTOZxqi/Uz8jodz7E1EE2Hi7W3VtjJFW4LGmbJGnC
Lt7Nym0B3iEmO+1/fxpnDfmt1lRnzu+Q65akTEd8eaEHbj8G7yo5OCpI4oVjRr7q9o
pn0upeaUIrxnepbAwXeozeebIuTSx2zuaH0xvL30=
Feedback-ID: hans.ullrich@lo
Received:
from protheus2.localnet (a89-183-193-109.net-htp.de [89.183.193.109])
(authenticated bits=0) by mail194c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with
ESMTP id 464C4rxR025870 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3
cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for
<[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:04:55 +0000
From: Hans <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: *****SPAM***** [SOLVED] Re: This is a testmail!
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 14:04:53 +0200
Message-ID: <2408526.NG923GbCHz@protheus2>
In-Reply-To: <46505217.fMDQidcC6G@protheus2>
References:
<3645068.R56niFO833@protheus2> <[email protected]>
<46505217.fMDQidcC6G@protheus2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean
X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean
X-VADE-SPAMSCORE: 0
X-VADE-SPAMSCORE: 0
X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE:
gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudelgdegiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgem
ucfjqffuvffqrffktedpgffpggdqveehtdenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjgh
fggfgtgejudeftdfjphegsehtufertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefjrghnshcuoehhrghnshdruhhllhhrihgthhesl
hhoohhprdguvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephfdvudekheefueevieelgefftdfhtedvlefgfefhieevveejud
elhffhleethfeknecukfhppeekvddrudelhedrjeehrddutddtpdekledrudekfedrudelfedruddtleenucevlhh
ushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpeekvddrudelhedrjeehrddutddtpdhhvghlohepsg
gvnhguvghlrdguvggsihgrnhdrohhrghdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegsohhunhgtvgdquggvsghirghnqdhus
hgvrhephhgrnhhsrdhulhhlrhhitghhpehlohhophdruggvsehlihhsthhsrdguvggsihgrnhdrohhrghdpnhg
spghrtghpthhtohepuddprhgtphhtthhopehhrghnshdruhhllhhrihgthheslhhoohhprdguvg X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE:
gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudelgdegjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgem
ucfjqffuvffqrffktedpqfgfvfdpgffpggdqveehtdenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjughrpefhvf
fufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepjfgrnhhsuceohhgrnhhsrdhulhhlrhhitghhsehlohho
phdruggvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeefvdethfeludejieeljeeugefgieekheeitdfggfehuedvvdfhjedute
ekkedtvdenucfkphepkeelrddukeefrdduleefrddutdelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrgh
mpehinhgvthepkeelrddukeefrdduleefrddutdelpdhhvghlohepphhrohhthhgvuhhsvddrlhhotggrlhhnv
ghtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhephhgrnhhsrdhulhhlrhhitghhsehlohhophdruggvpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhope
dupdhrtghpthhtohepuggvsghirghnqdhushgvrheslhhishhtshdruggvsghirghnrdhorhhg X-Rspamd-Status: No, score=1.59
X-Rspamd-Result: default: False [1.59 / 6.00];
R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[megamailservers.eu:s=maildub]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[];

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

From Jeff Pang@21:1/5 to Detlef Vollmann on Fri Jul 5 00:30:01 2024

I didn’t chech the header.
But loop.de should have its own signature.
Debian list server rewrite envelope address to list adress due to SRS requirements.
But message header address is not changed as well as message body
(debian list seems not modifying message body), so DKIM for loop.de will
be valid, then DMARC for loop.de will pass as well.

On 2024-07-05 04:54, Detlef Vollmann wrote:

Isn't this the usual DKIM problem with lists?
The From: has @loop.de, but the sender and DKIM signature
is from lists.debian.org.

That's why most lists these days rewrite the From: header.

Detlef

On 7/4/24 14:24, Hans wrote:

Me again, sorry.

Now I got my last mail back with the spam tag!

Subject:
Re: *****SPAM***** [SOLVED] Re: This is a testmail!

This is the header:

--------------------
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-SPAM-FACTOR: DKIM
X-Envelope-From:
bounce-debian-user=hans.ullrich=[email protected]
DMARC-Filter:
OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail39c50.megamailservers.eu 464C5Iek122979
Authentication-Results: mail39c50.megamailservers.eu;
dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=loop.de
Authentication-Results: mail39c50.megamailservers.eu;
spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.debian.org
Authentication-Results: mail39c50.megamailservers.eu;
dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key)
header.d=megamailservers.eu [email protected]
header.b="QLjumGn/"
Return-Path:
<bounce-debian-user=hans.ullrich=[email protected]>
Received:
from bendel.debian.org (bendel.debian.org [82.195.75.100]) by
mail39c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
464C5Iek122979 for
<[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:05:21 +0000
Received:
from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bendel.debian.org
(Postfix) with
QMQP id EA3E420682; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:05:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-Mailbox-Line:
From [email protected] Thu Jul 4 12:05:15 2024
Old-Return-Path: <[email protected]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
bendel.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.5 required=4.0
tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
FOURLA,KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS,LDOSUBSCRIBER,LDO_WHITELIST
autolearn=unavailable
autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Original-To: [email protected]
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received:
from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bendel.debian.org
(Postfix) with
ESMTP id C18E42067A for <[email protected]>; Thu,
4 Jul 2024 12:05:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No,
score=-6.301 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2,
DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FOURLA=0.1,
KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399,
LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received:
from bendel.debian.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lists.debian.org
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 2525) with ESMTP id CNGEsE8xgvQ4 for
<[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:05:03
+0000 (UTC)
X-policyd-weight:
NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 HELO_IP_IN_CL_SUBNET=-1.2 (check from:
.loop. -
helo: .mail194c50.megamailservers. - helo-domain: .megamailservers.)
FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -4.7
Received:
from mail194c50.megamailservers.eu (mail208c50.megamailservers.eu
[91.136.10.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher
ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384
(256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by
bendel.debian.org
(Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC67D20677 for
<[email protected]>; Thu,
4 Jul 2024 12:05:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Authenticated-User: [email protected]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;
d=megamailservers.eu;
s=maildub; t=1720094700;
bh=5Um9/MplAQNd+svZJOunmBGElnorPOi9odLzGqxgObQ=;
h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
b=QLjumGn/60xFVhN9BUbajEg0uTOZxqi/Uz8jodz7E1EE2Hi7W3VtjJFW4LGmbJGnC
Lt7Nym0B3iEmO+1/fxpnDfmt1lRnzu+Q65akTEd8eaEHbj8G7yo5OCpI4oVjRr7q9o
pn0upeaUIrxnepbAwXeozeebIuTSx2zuaH0xvL30=
Feedback-ID: hans.ullrich@lo
Received:
from protheus2.localnet (a89-183-193-109.net-htp.de
[89.183.193.109])
(authenticated bits=0) by mail194c50.megamailservers.eu
(8.14.9/8.13.1) with
ESMTP id 464C4rxR025870 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3
cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for
<[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:04:55 +0000
From: Hans <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: *****SPAM***** [SOLVED] Re: This is a testmail!
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 14:04:53 +0200
Message-ID: <2408526.NG923GbCHz@protheus2>
In-Reply-To: <46505217.fMDQidcC6G@protheus2>
References:
<3645068.R56niFO833@protheus2> <[email protected]>
<46505217.fMDQidcC6G@protheus2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean
X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean
X-VADE-SPAMSCORE: 0
X-VADE-SPAMSCORE: 0
X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE:

gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudelgdegiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgem
ucfjqffuvffqrffktedpgffpggdqveehtdenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjgh
fggfgtgejudeftdfjphegsehtufertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefjrghnshcuoehhrghnshdruhhllhhrihgthhesl
hhoohhprdguvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephfdvudekheefueevieelgefftdfhtedvlefgfefhieevveejud
elhffhleethfeknecukfhppeekvddrudelhedrjeehrddutddtpdekledrudekfedrudelfedruddtleenucevlhh
ushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpeekvddrudelhedrjeehrddutddtpdhhvghlohepsg
gvnhguvghlrdguvggsihgrnhdrohhrghdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegsohhunhgtvgdquggvsghirghnqdhus
hgvrhephhgrnhhsrdhulhhlrhhitghhpehlohhophdruggvsehlihhsthhsrdguvggsihgrnhdrohhrghdpnhg
spghrtghpthhtohepuddprhgtphhtthhopehhrghnshdruhhllhhrihgthheslhhoohhprdguvg >> X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE:

gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudelgdegjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgem
ucfjqffuvffqrffktedpqfgfvfdpgffpggdqveehtdenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjughrpefhvf
fufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepjfgrnhhsuceohhgrnhhsrdhulhhlrhhitghhsehlohho
phdruggvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeefvdethfeludejieeljeeugefgieekheeitdfggfehuedvvdfhjedute
ekkedtvdenucfkphepkeelrddukeefrdduleefrddutdelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrgh
mpehinhgvthepkeelrddukeefrdduleefrddutdelpdhhvghlohepphhrohhthhgvuhhsvddrlhhotggrlhhnv
ghtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhephhgrnhhsrdhulhhlrhhitghhsehlohhophdruggvpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhope
dupdhrtghpthhtohepuggvsghirghnqdhushgvrheslhhishhtshdruggvsghirghnrdhorhhg >> X-Rspamd-Status: No, score=1.59
X-Rspamd-Result: default: False [1.59 / 6.00];
R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[megamailservers.eu:s=maildub]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[];

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Who's Online
Recent Visitors
- Krenn
  Sat Jun 6 11:38:56 2026
  from Sydney, Nsw via Telnet
- Furryboy
  Sat Jun 6 10:56:29 2026
  from Romania, Galati via SSH
- Centurion
  Fri Jun 5 22:28:01 2026
  from Berea, Ohio via Telnet
- Ab Cadd
  Fri Jun 5 17:52:51 2026
  from Sheboygan, Wi via Telnet
- Gwylbert
  Fri Jun 5 06:28:52 2026
  from Sydney, Nsw via Telnet
- Centurion
  Thu Jun 4 23:42:23 2026
  from Berea, Ohio via Telnet
- Michal Wronka
  Thu Jun 4 23:19:58 2026
  from Wroclaw, Poland via Telnet
- Michal Wronka
  Thu Jun 4 23:17:20 2026
  from Wroclaw, Poland via SSH

System Info

Sysop:	Keyop
Location:	Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK
Users:	715
Nodes:	16 (2 / 14)
Uptime:	146:12:42
Calls:	12,089
Calls today:	2
Files:	15,000
Messages:	6,517,501

This is a testmail!

Who's Online

Recent Visitors

System Info