Hello,
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 08:03:00PM +0000, Niels Thykier wrote:
armel/armhf:
------------
* Undesirable to keep the hardware running beyond 2020. armhf VM
support uncertain. (DSA)
- Source: [DSA Sprint report]
[DSA Sprint report]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2018/02/msg00004.html
In this report Julien Cristau wrote:
In short, the hardware (development boards) we're currently using to
build armel and armhf packages aren't up to our standards, and we
really, really want them to go away when stretch goes EOL (expected in
2020). We urge arm porters to find a way to build armhf packages in
VMs or chroots on server-class arm64 hardware.
If the concerns are mostly about the hardware not being rackable, there
is a rackable NAS by Netgear:
https://www.netgear.com/business/products/storage/readynas/RN2120.aspx#tab-techspecs
with an armhf cpu. Not sure if cpu speed (1.2 GHz) and available RAM (2
GiB) are good enough. The machine can run mainline Linux[1]. I think
U-Boot doesn't support this machine in mainline though.
Apart from that the people in #debian-arm (e.g. Sledge) seem to be
positive that at least armhf should be fine to be built on arm64
hardware.
Best regards
Uwe
[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp-netgear-rn2120.dts
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEfnIqFpAYrP8+dKQLwfwUeK3K7AkFAls13KwACgkQwfwUeK3K 7AnhZQf+LuCOAa9Ds0SZAGu+Y/0x+07TkWOpTMmSBYnlCYLbphZUz9TOpm0w/B79 Vei8Pp8278UwZmSmMglq0hmQwm1cAqnNRuSDlWiS2YX5pYIOVhHmi9l1DRedJpVw 849nLx00iHAWWOkKmcI/Sc9Ttolvx0UGZe92/7lGVRpzG9SdJFU5q3uCzLBkXFUf Lu93jut197neEQ/teo8tMiBZ0QdJVkrodwp0NN9iat+kW0vptZYpFkjfmaOnRYw3 Pq2zjSPuTV+GFd4EVvvTYkVM0Qs4IG7fkqIAm0X79N4as3mgbgXI1bqb0TazkR4H PGSA6BB/W5QU1krdK50xpcREuIozOA==
=pL3a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)