1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.DEVEL.MENTOR

  • Re: Preventing a broken release arch from blocking testing migration

    From =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsOpbXkgTGFs?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 17 14:50:01 2022
    Le ven. 17 juin 2022 à 14:31, Daniel Gröber <[email protected]> a écrit :

    Hi Mentors,

    my package yosys has a test failure on mips64el that I can't figure out and consequently got removed from testing. I'm wondering how to deal with this?

    From reading the policy it seems I can use the Architecture field to list
    all arches except mips64el. Is that the right thing to do here?

    I also wonder if there is a way to specify "everything except mips64el" instead of listing all arches explicitly?


    https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals#Removals_from_testing.2C_stable_and_oldstable

    Jérémy

    <div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le ven. 17 juin 2022 à 14:31, Daniel Gröber &lt;<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt; a écrit :<br></div><blockquote
    class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi Mentors,<br>

    my package yosys has a test failure on mips64el that I can&#39;t figure out and<br>
    consequently got removed from testing. I&#39;m wondering how to deal with this?<br>

    From reading the policy it seems I can use the Architecture field to list<br> all arches except mips64el. Is that the right thing to do here?<br>

    I also wonder if there is a way to specify &quot;everything except mips64el&quot;<br>
    instead of listing all arches explicitly?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div><a href="https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals#Removals_from_testing.2C_stable_and_oldstable">https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals#Removals_from_testing.2C_stable_
    and_oldstable</a></div><div><br></div><div>Jérémy</div></div></div>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel =?utf-8?Q?Gr=C3=B6ber?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 17 14:40:01 2022
    Hi Mentors,

    my package yosys has a test failure on mips64el that I can't figure out and consequently got removed from testing. I'm wondering how to deal with this?

    From reading the policy it seems I can use the Architecture field to list
    all arches except mips64el. Is that the right thing to do here?

    I also wonder if there is a way to specify "everything except mips64el"
    instead of listing all arches explicitly?

    Thanks,
    --Daniel


    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEV6G/FbT2+ZuJ7bKf05SBrh55rPcFAmKsbSMACgkQ05SBrh55 rPeR9hAAj9a7Qy6Bm+sszbWL4ENNc9FT4N+mQ2pKwxoUUaA6tRj8F4b2yqDK0JSQ 84mD4mSHlChhGStsEVdNnHK5ePSZgFWthaAC+zHUhSh+JLqkBRdwXtlQI8TrP9U6 /HTm9EG7c4A4yuFpApLkOZfDIGUMdihLFT+ulCNR1TTuCvFHuSKYdJxc3hl2WNaF VLb1nUt7Gs5ERfOncYH3LuAWujeIZF+z18wKxC2VwwTN+1bXNIkyQvlkBpGrgRQx b+x/847YO6+/LrhGSYyVKWCqFC/Nl+dYUSKvOaCI1KvlHncAp1U6zLomYKm8Vf+z 6JjobSR5m4hNI8Q7MLdQGoqhFHsGj8yL//zgz97SKW+Z/riIzn3YUuDagnJ7Uzui qN/LHPGkWgv3BstYuxanULFS5QUWEbwRNMKTJp/mANcewPS+swbULW5cm0Iyky48 eFs8xPypqLP16C9ne2NavgyNezvKDkPKF56RyuFcmKNLF1HhPDOQPy4RSzGT7cTw GNvYG462yCv59kVoyy7HtVJmlwzS4rzsKaR7E2W8U33VC9D9LxabzBA1VZQvwCyH gcn/9MoVUx6+mXgMrFUQ1/mArG8IDAJstWMN7pDS1XrbY2WQ/AheHmHVL8p2daq3 1F2GUIRDSs6ugZIW1Q4OUNEChbWJ1+eVd+rQofSbCr/qAhP5uLU=
    =U+sn
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrey Rahmatullin@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 17 15:00:01 2022
    On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 02:01:42PM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote:
    my package yosys has a test failure on mips64el that I can't figure out and consequently got removed from testing. I'm wondering how to deal with this?

    From reading the policy it seems I can use the Architecture field to list
    all arches except mips64el. Is that the right thing to do here?
    Well, ideally you should fix the test or the software. If that's
    impossible then yeah.

    I also wonder if there is a way to specify "everything except mips64el" instead of listing all arches explicitly?
    Unfortunately no.

    --
    WBR, wRAR

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQJhBAABCgBLFiEEolIP6gqGcKZh3YxVM2L3AxpJkuEFAmKseNgtFIAAAAAAFQAP cGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3Jnd3JhckBkZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEDNi9wMaSZLh A4QP/Rl15tBwOXLc4Cpk9NRFautZFus32fZZZLVYgy2BMm4bZKe7rO/oMD9ynsI+ 25qLnaAMtobCvFatGffigIRIXnj9a4TthSyVFLZ0/qApyCL2rhjFz+hEftlCM2VE b7l6A/GmtSOE+WX2/DvgB44Lp3LcaYJRxTrmK4ZbeN+/nHRvhDoNbWBrXoj7bUNs 5yEBSYTFzZp3xbS6oBgeZm+fx66ZPrvow4+DIKmoMLSQn2LcvJTKsWurT2Nv5Bp2 spFP08MYuyyqCCVCxtXyg6jsesKc0ryfQLg57s6MUIFd4EfNjs7XewFs4nSGtV9W V8jVm4ncMezl2/MYOycxxYy+zSvduktrMQWJnq4dRup8q0nDlAWaD5/p+elVBiVp tkmbaZetT8hked0ffCv2Czbo4WKiE6JbNM1rFFH+5ySuyS+aHjQMwH+GFKMOhyMX yW/YCTzEl6R5d+beJ3l7OkLJQedsS3aq2hY5xF3a+FcJet6gwDAcYHxjaBulKFkW CqzExIgjlozxKao0axLFT57yBrYjb94S9uaaDxpaW2oJ9vCnJ6zkSFvY7KqsHsOJ CBwcYp2hzG0OfiWXng1jnaQWADdEPu7oX+UU/DV/NcEi7qfNhy1+c/dSKH9OdQzX MS7JkvDsa2V2jY9jpyiuPVGh0QXydoL3+h0Hvoco4Pfm8tCY
    =/oUM
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel =?utf-8?Q?Gr=C3=B6ber?=@21:1/5 to Andrey Rahmatullin on Fri Jun 17 15:20:01 2022
    Hi Andrey,

    On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 05:51:36PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
    On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 02:01:42PM +0200, Daniel Gr�ber wrote:
    my package yosys has a test failure on mips64el that I can't figure out and consequently got removed from testing. I'm wondering how to deal with this?

    From reading the policy it seems I can use the Architecture field to list all arches except mips64el. Is that the right thing to do here?
    Well, ideally you should fix the test or the software. If that's
    impossible then yeah.

    Ideally yes, but I just don't see anyone wanting to build/test FPGA
    bitstreams on a wee little embedded mips router thingies ;) so it's just
    not worth spending time on IMO.

    I also wonder if there is a way to specify "everything except mips64el" instead of listing all arches explicitly?
    Unfortunately no.

    Alright as long as I'm not missing something obvious :)

    Thanks,
    --Daniel

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEV6G/FbT2+ZuJ7bKf05SBrh55rPcFAmKsfTUACgkQ05SBrh55 rPev2xAAgQV/bCT/RhsjYtt7TiPNbiFnU/sE0f3kfXzKb0KInJ3nzitCjf0+aLHM hLHADYQZjdHCLz2qGLHeaMg3ss24qUsCE9ffhC1AbKO7sdMhY5YePTdMD8+5IPvc SMsIjmnpo6tIpONZ72/+sCxUPJEOAz0DKDgLOcaMRT9Xk2X1o2y6tlDx0KALpLFz EKZ7RMlFYpN5he/g7DYfx4gIROZpNo65CELNFqMZrJbJxygaDSLK1y5pRkqGMajB dZDP06EhGo7QmUtUV8E5Yegf/dfbNzzXRI+JbbCrzvpo0aIzUapKwB7MHO7t8FKl D49N+wvQ1zJGSoUqy0XUbllMcp1tBm/uB948POsB9rSnInDaN0hUyK+uziCKOfOd n5bHFspFvHypMk1CZMDJrPEqaiMb6rJZiuA6daXvkDOFwTVpWXobZJoYzikvzKZT i0qLJqeMNcD3cUkk47szWlAAPU68krppJ6mpRxgH3sfbstYPmAlE0MrOT/IDGk5g 5SeH1ZoArMg8/OVl8ZamnuTRxhLex5RHASnWwK3hFulYgMRMP63K8udUTKvoRVbt xrsNtu6Ob6O6DNJFHoEVA1x4D/+6o5FDS4c3mugy+z3vuCYvmVBX1CYfmHjg8PuC uRpgyU1DQmYDxDWxFjTr5Jl+ACO+pqoux1rvdqRRv9uLjAVxfqI=
    =0n0H
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)