Thanks for the responses and attempts to build!
Yes, it takes quite a bit of memory unfortunately, due to some very
large auto-generated swig wrappers combined with some complicated
boost usage.
In any case, I was not so much asking for help building/reproducing,
as I was asking what I can do other than to reply to the bug, which
seems not to be eliciting a response, to either avoid or delay the
auto-removal process. Is auto-removal policy documented somewhere? Unfortunately all my searches turn up "apt-get autoremove" help
instead.
I am really worried the package will get removed from the upcoming
Debian release because of this.
regards,
Steve
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:47 PM Eriberto Mota <
[email protected]> wrote:
I used a trivial jail with chroot. I can't reproduce the issue.
Regards,
Eriberto
Em qui., 29 de abr. de 2021 às 18:30, Tobias Frost <[email protected]> escreveu:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 05:25:28PM +0200, Stephen Sinclair wrote:
Hi Mentors,
My package siconos currently has a bug filed [1] and has been marked
for autoremoval from testing.
The problem is that I cannot reproduce it. The failure is on a test
that depends on another package, so I am wondering if there was just a glitch here? I have replied to the bug report with working build
logs, but there has been no further activity, so I am not sure what further action I can take to avoid that the package gets removed.
Thanks for any help.
Steve
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986515
I could also not reproduce it in a pbuilder chroot. Might indeed be a glitch
or some other dependency causing this…
I'd either downgrade it to non RC and tag it unreproducible or close it with
the request to reopen if it pops up again.
--
tobi
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)