1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.MAINT.HAMS

  • Re: Bug#1051182: wsjtx: new upstream version 2.7.x

    From Nate Bargmann@21:1/5 to All on Sun Sep 17 04:50:02 2023
    Is there any chance for an unofficial package for Bookworm or do I need
    to build it from source?

    73, Nate

    --
    "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
    possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true."
    Web: https://www.n0nb.us
    Projects: https://github.com/N0NB
    GPG fingerprint: 82D6 4F6B 0E67 CD41 F689 BBA6 FB2C 5130 D55A 8819


    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iF0EABECAB0WIQSC1k9rDmfNQfaJu6b7LFEw1VqIGQUCZQZj+QAKCRD7LFEw1VqI GVEoAKCfC93k5I+qSdrb+ZGWbO3V7iTptACfan4lr4ORQynxYf92/REY9aL4UD4=
    =KT0D
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tony mancill@21:1/5 to Nate Bargmann on Sun Sep 17 06:00:01 2023
    On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 09:27:05PM -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
    Is there any chance for an unofficial package for Bookworm or do I need
    to build it from source?

    Hi Nate,

    The current source package builds and run cleanly on Bookworm. I did my testing on arm64, but I can't imagine it being any different for other architectures.

    I can build (unofficial) binary packages against Bookworm for arm64 and
    amd64 and make those available for download, or if there is enough
    interest, I could prepare an upload for backports. (I guess the latter
    is more generally useful.)

    Which architecture are you looking for?

    Cheers,
    tony

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE5Qr9Va3SequXFjqLIdIFiZdLPpYFAmUGeW0ACgkQIdIFiZdL PpZHcxAAoN6OKvQ/X814ZKR+EN5AHh+ihOnav0v5cq7JBMOP77jrsz/BcQgSzvA0 zwHkDGV/gDi9ER8GspkC7DqtdOeWxOwJCAj1duS3oK7+LIxq/+nE3XzlU5FDsTV9 oRFE8n9dS7PX7g+AfTdARZxPoyzQ+b/5K5XvkpzFdCkCW/nQ3yM+UIuva9iePClp z2JGaORN+dYKuXnYZWziQbWbuTkV98f4njs5nc5Fljc0+PT8DeUqhHoX3BzsBHIu XYE1rpyfuJqz/yxFh7J4X8g50W2FDzcTMipl3w6l+axQoSwz8DUbsvfpmyOzF3rs hjEPBqqV1R2TmVp+fXVp5xuZFQvc5b+n6zFqiynPjDK2+fr7ESqHERfWVec6VeEm 5FmARqxVCr7XgScIOFSoOyojStfyF69S/NpxTu1/IxOIa/myXcFddii9s15G0yET 5RTPskz4k+Qql4F8B7DE+VmX8Syag3sAT5DGImmqjMunz3XicMARk9yyIS0x60Vu zWs3sao/UQxm7DXQk6quVSRPgO80hotEiAiprYPkeA802/9ssuXD9sNG6/chLiHL Uw9D1VMVj2oHLbV9QsnIUkdiA1oUrFA+v0Fjt7iTuUMKWhxVgEsL6CTjeSooLD6D VbroKe0VJEDLL/SOkvIDyu24Oa6euQpDD6GK8Ed5ihBBVhBRZqI=
    =pr36
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nate Bargmann@21:1/5 to tony mancill on Sun Sep 17 10:50:02 2023
    * On 2023 16 Sep 22:59 -0500, tony mancill wrote:
    On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 09:27:05PM -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
    Is there any chance for an unofficial package for Bookworm or do I need
    to build it from source?

    Hi Nate,

    The current source package builds and run cleanly on Bookworm. I did my testing on arm64, but I can't imagine it being any different for other architectures.

    I can build (unofficial) binary packages against Bookworm for arm64 and
    amd64 and make those available for download, or if there is enough
    interest, I could prepare an upload for backports. (I guess the latter
    is more generally useful.)

    Yes, backports would be quite useful since I already have it enabled.

    Which architecture are you looking for?

    I will use it on amd64, which is rather standard fare these days.

    In 2017 this location was in the path of totality and without any other coordination I set up to run WSPR on 160m. During totality 160m did
    open to around 500 to 700 miles as I recall. The D layer is very short
    lived.

    73, Nate

    --
    "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
    possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true."
    Web: https://www.n0nb.us
    Projects: https://github.com/N0NB
    GPG fingerprint: 82D6 4F6B 0E67 CD41 F689 BBA6 FB2C 5130 D55A 8819


    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iF0EABECAB0WIQSC1k9rDmfNQfaJu6b7LFEw1VqIGQUCZQa8wAAKCRD7LFEw1VqI GTe1AJ9WBNR7OKpuDwLVIyIvER07SZTvMwCgi5ST8lpr2jkOH+yg4aoFTeEzIi0=
    =4Gys
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tony mancill@21:1/5 to Nate Bargmann on Sun Sep 17 22:50:01 2023
    On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 03:45:53AM -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
    Yes, backports would be quite useful since I already have it enabled.

    Which architecture are you looking for?

    I will use it on amd64, which is rather standard fare these days.

    I have prepared a package for bookworm-backports, but won't be able to
    upload it until the 2.7.0~rc2 package in unstable migrates to testing, a
    few days from now.

    In the meantime, you can find amd64 binary packages for bookworm here:

    https://people.debian.org/~tmancill/wsjtx-1051182/

    You can verify the downloads with:

    $ sha256sum --check wsjtx_2.7.0~rc2+repack-2~bpo12+1.sha256 wsjtx_2.7.0~rc2+repack-2~bpo12+1_amd64.deb: OK wsjtx-data_2.7.0~rc2+repack-2~bpo12+1_all.deb: OK wsjtx-dbgsym_2.7.0~rc2+repack-2~bpo12+1_amd64.deb: OK wsjtx-doc_2.7.0~rc2+repack-2~bpo12+1_all.deb: OK

    And the SHA256 sums with (assuming you have the debian-keyring and
    gnupg packages installed):

    $ gpg --keyring /usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg --verify wsjtx_2.7.0~rc2+repack-2~bpo12+1.sha256.asc
    gpg: assuming signed data in 'wsjtx_2.7.0~rc2+repack-2~bpo12+1.sha256'
    gpg: Signature made Sun 17 Sep 2023 01:34:11 PM PDT
    gpg: using RSA key E50AFD55ADD27AAB97163A8B21D20589974B3E96
    gpg: Good signature from "tony mancill <[email protected]>" [ultimate]
    gpg: aka "tony mancill <[email protected]>" [ultimate]
    gpg: aka "[jpeg image of size 5851]" [ultimate]
    gpg: aka "[jpeg image of size 3766]" [ultimate]
    Primary key fingerprint: E50A FD55 ADD2 7AAB 9716 3A8B 21D2 0589 974B 3E96

    Cheers,
    tony

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE5Qr9Va3SequXFjqLIdIFiZdLPpYFAmUHZQMACgkQIdIFiZdL PpZudhAAvjXriNmdQhduQ/a4N/JgPBfzz4kA9ZzZ9g1H/kMHXS44m4iVGFKJwtTF fa0IVr+1AWCl2H9dFTSBbfRIVCCRrF1h9Qb9cdvouJ6DtydwJXR40R22RYR6j3EF mTFHn1hvzz2rPwuaC/TBKYYW/lu3nSvhM7AmBBusBybichWUpD4FN5/tK5XCjdIb ZF/bmdu47x1VO+fQmcKnUFBOmHKNFCtRyx38qa37VeA430vWCsVEW+vOfIhmPT4O ncVIll29PN5+bjzgQL4A3u9FhVrI/npbrifin/vRCxRJU+Ud1tQVOjig+DzRK81A TW7n38Vlmw6FvfKv5PSbxr0kYK9XCAkdEmWf4ZQELKvgM/fhEnW0/oxCSxNiUuzD y1XaesxFSQ2N+EU6SkNfzM03ZKsdaqQ0dHKGyPT379m7q9pJLAK00BY/iCsBJy+4 1Xsv1+n4/70maqoAiRNmIulUI4VDijC9NRpK5j2tLQ31H6n3UuEIK20di5/e6Zo5 vC+wPo8qS0bEk9Av+2gKd1PIllJyHMR5UtwilK7xyaU+tpq0z7l3oW8sNuNtlZ9g KllZ5mgsB4h3Haiw+W7xtCAVJ180dHFNU2DauHn3vyM5YY08OYIY04GffmG1v8ud MIkJ8MfN1VdsUGfNRBqG0QamWWfLKe1R1eh5Kh/NXenoRGZXmM4=
    =Eepd
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nate Bargmann@21:1/5 to tony mancill on Sat Sep 23 00:10:01 2023
    * On 2023 17 Sep 15:45 -0500, tony mancill wrote:
    On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 03:45:53AM -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
    Yes, backports would be quite useful since I already have it enabled.

    Which architecture are you looking for?

    I will use it on amd64, which is rather standard fare these days.

    I have prepared a package for bookworm-backports, but won't be able to
    upload it until the 2.7.0~rc2 package in unstable migrates to testing, a
    few days from now.

    In the meantime, you can find amd64 binary packages for bookworm here:

    https://people.debian.org/~tmancill/wsjtx-1051182/

    Thanks, Tony.

    So far, so good on 10m FT8.

    73, Nate

    --
    "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
    possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true."
    Web: https://www.n0nb.us
    Projects: https://github.com/N0NB
    GPG fingerprint: 82D6 4F6B 0E67 CD41 F689 BBA6 FB2C 5130 D55A 8819


    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iF0EABECAB0WIQSC1k9rDmfNQfaJu6b7LFEw1VqIGQUCZQ4OugAKCRD7LFEw1VqI GdWQAJ9JdUqA6BFVCnkEbaaOzRsqi3Db5ACgpC1pTzi0vXj1/SVenzoMLTEnF5M=
    =ss+r
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tony mancill@21:1/5 to Nate Bargmann on Sat Sep 23 07:50:01 2023
    On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 05:01:30PM -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
    I have prepared a package for bookworm-backports, but won't be able to upload it until the 2.7.0~rc2 package in unstable migrates to testing, a few days from now.

    In the meantime, you can find amd64 binary packages for bookworm here:

    https://people.debian.org/~tmancill/wsjtx-1051182/

    So far, so good on 10m FT8.

    Thanks for testing Nate.

    The package has migrated to testing and is now eligible for an upload to backports. I will do so as soon as I am granted access to the backports
    queue. I'm unsure how long that might take, so if another DD or DM is
    willing to do the upload, I have pushed a 'debian/bookworm-backports'
    branch to the packaging repo [1]. (And if we don't have an upload by
    the end of next week, I will request an upload via the debian-backports
    list.)

    Cheers,
    tony

    [1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian-hamradio-team/wsjtx/-/tree/debian/bookworm-backports

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Christoph Berg@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 25 09:50:01 2023
    Re: tony mancill
    The package has migrated to testing and is now eligible for an upload to backports. I will do so as soon as I am granted access to the backports queue. I'm unsure how long that might take, so if another DD or DM is willing to do the upload, I have pushed a 'debian/bookworm-backports'
    branch to the packaging repo [1].

    Hi Tony,

    I've uploaded the package now, thanks for preparing it!

    Christoph DF7CB

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)