• openjdk-8 still needed for bootstrapping?

    From Thorsten Glaser@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 26 21:00:01 2023
    Hi,

    apparently there’s again the question whether we still need
    openjdk-8 in sid for bootstrapping JVM-based languages and/or
    utilities. This is independent of the question whehter it
    should be there to ease backports or because people might
    otherwise turn to Canonical’s commercial offer or whether it
    can be supported in sid with not too high effort (given it’s
    maintained with an active upstream, I’d say yes).

    Last time I asked the answer was a vague yes; is this still
    the case?

    Thanks in advance,
    //mirabilos
    --
    Infrastrukturexperte • tarent solutions GmbH
    Am Dickobskreuz 10, D-53121 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/
    Telephon +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235
    HRB AG Bonn 5168 • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941
    Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg

    **************************************************** /⁀\ The UTF-8 Ribbon
    ╲ ╱ Campaign against Mit dem tarent-Newsletter nichts mehr verpassen:  ╳  HTML eMail! Also, https://www.tarent.de/newsletter
    ╱ ╲ header encryption!
    ****************************************************

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Emmanuel Bourg@21:1/5 to Thorsten Glaser on Fri Jul 7 13:50:01 2023
    On 26/06/2023 20:53, Thorsten Glaser wrote:

    Last time I asked the answer was a vague yes; is this still
    the case?

    Nothing has changed, so yes. We just need openjdk-8 in unstable.

    Emmanuel Bourg

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)