• lem_2022-12-10+dfsg2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

    From Sean Whitton@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 5 15:10:01 2024
    +----------------------+
    | REJECT reasoning |
    +----------------------+

    It looks like ocaml-lib/pset.mli etc. are LGPL-2.1+-with-linking-exception not LGPL-2.

    +----------------------+
    | Other comments |
    +----------------------+

    You don't need this much details. You can coalesce copyright statements for files with the same license. E.g. the stanza for examples/cpp/cmm.lem, hol-lib/lemLib.sml and hol-lib/lemScript.sml can be a single stanza, and so
    on. You probably only need two or three stanzas.

    +----------------------+
    | N.B. |
    +----------------------+

    This review may not be exhaustive. Please check your source package
    against your d/copyright and the ftpmaster REJECT-FAQ, throughly,
    before uploading to NEW again.

    Thank you for your time and contribution!

    Sean



    ===

    Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
    your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.


    --==============e22761053860138181=Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iHUEABYIAB0WIQTziqJOuF8J+ZI8pJSb9qggYcy5IQUCZtmrWQAKCRCb9qggYcy5 ISVrAP9pJkQJcgSaSb6EN010kYGe5u7LC0NcbYcdaHjBK6hHqwD6A5NSEYIsrLJ/ i2g3va/Z0ilJ8fWrAJ84RPEgMaIfhgc=KCgo
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sean Whitton@21:1/5 to Bo YU on Fri Sep 6 11:50:01 2024
    Hello,

    On Thu 05 Sep 2024 at 11:23pm +08, Bo YU wrote:

    But you suggest me to apply LGPL-2.1+-with-linking-exception for ocaml-lib/pmap* and ocaml-lib/pset.*, I am not sure when I look at
    these files again. For example, the copyright from
    ocaml-lib/pmap.ml[2]

    I'm suggesting it from looking at the file headers themselves. Don't
    they say it has the exception too?

    Thanks for reminding this again. Here I have one question that needs
    to be verified. Taking these files as an example[4], could we convert
    into [5]?

    Yes, that's fine. I know what you mean about amplifying rights claims,
    but copyright is not the same as an AUTHORS file saying who made the
    most substantive contributions.

    --
    Sean Whitton

    --=-=-Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQJNBAEBCgA3FiEEm5FwB64DDjbk/CSLaVt65L8GYkAFAmbazrsZHHNwd2hpdHRv bkBzcHdoaXR0b24ubmFtZQAKCRBpW3rkvwZiQBH0D/9VxNTkPWOaGYBm0aADhFVX Q+gYDzXol+zUOslkI2ikl71A85AsI63CP4yLSThy8U8xriFt9X8BfvohqNJup3o5 RH4UkjJzKUj+gYrMHIzZ406I+Dvvv5akEK3+Jg9eJWdz582sVrBqHU0njjLR/Xp9 OPTdYetCEyzc8wdpUvlRqRdGAmHO3/wJAJumlmlcdnSc0hPvxqr/zijs0izCVhbe 6lkGq71HYUiLe5Htni8WS63OzV9RhR7dwHfyv98iJhw+wVx4WIDySe527EzF1Njk N5+3Ml1wavgU+gSiH0pGcdCf6wOgXO+7I6fJ6hLVV/gwbno/rBfGhHm9CTXStthK Hxh0xFY02C/Q1QJ23nyErvFsGG+2PqErFdGt3TJOUacEEiiWgH9QTZoETWofRH5F aQLz4LaMvuvBiO4BxK7nJrBcaTVuTyRt8OiPoct/cyb20HjXjH6lGL9SEatV0Doy Syx49SsDdZHS21E7/NOMfN/LK5S6kX9gMd8T/kTUGRn5dXO23RpaM1O8HKcKl/Up jE9PRAfyR782Y6r5jTWVa0CVmqzrThblSZLGZIH63SFbjYnVedFB+GNbMG0DEnoH x+3KvUpPUs9UG62H71Cu+bwOk/IycwtT2LtYRD3OXp9lx1W6U378jFgK9BlTQy4K RCsyFuudCwEMLrHP4VwM7g==XWVv
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Us