1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.DOC

  • Bug#994839: marked as done (ch-upgrading.en.html#sufficient-space: a su

    From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to Andrei POPESCU on Thu Sep 23 16:10:01 2021
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Thu, 23 Sep 2021 15:49:19 +0200
    with message-id <[email protected]>
    and subject line Re: Bug#994839: ch-upgrading.en.html#sufficient-space: a suggestion.
    has caused the Debian Bug report #994839,
    regarding ch-upgrading.en.html#sufficient-space: a suggestion.
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
    immediately.)


    --
    994839: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994839
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact [email protected] with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2021 18:41:31 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2018-09-13) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
    DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,
    FREEMAIL_FROM,HAS_PACKAGE,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
    MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,
    SPOOFED_FREEMAIL,SPOOF_GMAIL_MID,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
    version=3.4.2-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 11; hammy, 101; neutral, 26; spammy,
    0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--H*UA:1.10.1, 0.000-+--H*u:1.10.1,
    0.000-+--H*UA:2018-07-13, 0.000-+--H*u:2018-07-13,
    0.000-+--H*RU:sk:brian@c
    Return-path: <[email protected]>
    Received: from copernicus.org.uk ([77.44.
  • From Andrei POPESCU@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 24 08:20:01 2021
    Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 15:49:19 +0200
    From: Paul Gevers

    On 22-09-2021 07:02, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
    On Ma, 21 sep 21, 19:41:25, Brian Potkin wrote:


    It would seem to me that step 4 should be advising

    umount /var/cache/apt/archives


    Yes, this would be the correct command.

    Ack. Committed locally and about to push.

    Hi Paul,

    Would you mind if I commit such trivial-but-obvious fixes directly?

    Is there something else to consider (besides fixing existing
    translations)?

    Kind regards,
    Andrei
    --
    http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE5E64jOIbhY42OXqk/8eFRO8iNBwFAmFNbbUACgkQ/8eFRO8i NBzoFA/9HwgyEHfASSuCtZk6MI3n53qbKLjij2fR9+4Qnq1YNbu+gIXaCMkwid3C SBNzWTwHz4CDnU58Ziw64/b8WR0/W+vyEWJV7ot68iq78g6BAdQxciObxlmg7yXl HlMySejRICwtjx47bQtjEJkARPXY3SC6khQ/Pm6ss7LmSjM+1I4YZ6GlvFVk5he/ bttvHzEAzlR5Uom2pbHdLD7N3GwGoifNRRTJZHYYiNt9+2xiqWXwxw+pZCzRAju4 YPCxvBMTCz8EayJKarD98kmJlYs0zSRCJLjQCtUI4bhOJsI/f+ki37UHqkprISLx hk5wapWrEwVdxzEnsV9Tz/l7jLJCQ+Gn5th/gAo4yBcIJyOLLpIS3aY6Nt5j5MpY NcLOAsOOP58C1zHY9/VC0pJjaRRgcFHo1Vrav0uUOBagH81WRAZ48Emc6H+M1IOy 7ADYg545rzx5D+N8EBaEsvrJj6SAfsNzoHNWUvdE/sLlg//KYhnk6DjWJvXxn3xw zjFCvljnA1UALymScpv5iPjFCBLDBSftcNDzaNMeCPbC1Jt4JSYPhDeY9QJV3Ce4 YYkZlTwq6B7N7QNA0Jkv+Np25ydjl/v9UwJSXAae90m23AdkM1go6aMH8YXdMfsM ZA5jPLicVszNdtY0PDD0SVhkHZKV9tVwUAAexZL00HYQLCTqbV8=
    =OP04
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul Gevers@21:1/5 to Andrei POPESCU on Fri Sep 24 20:20:01 2021
    To: [email protected]

    This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --WQbavSLVulKclmWn3outb77qRyyufJ8hq
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
    Content-Language: en-US
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    Hi Andrei,

    On 24-09-2021 08:18, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
    Would you mind if I commit such trivial-but-obvious fixes directly?

    If you're really sure, yes, go ahead. Making sure somebody from the
    release team (me) is aware would be *really* appreciated.

    Is there something else to consider (besides fixing existing
    translations)?

    Around the release (i.e. half a year before and until we branched off) I
    try to be nice to translators and leave mistakes in the original in to
    avoid creating too much fuzzy translations, unless I can fix the
    original in the translations too (like I did this time).

    Paul


    --WQbavSLVulKclmWn3outb77qRyyufJ8hq--

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    wsB5BAABCAAjFiEEWLZtSHNr6TsFLeZynFyZ6wW9dQoFAmFOFMMFAwAAAAAACgkQnFyZ6wW9dQoq 2AgA0ddlNwYCvo44yhmdeoGTIC3jiV9429V7duWJKSUOQcOJCyALkZAI1TGUeMjnY1Jn3ftGoBsr SCiqelIQWJoD1KWMrkjierRC7RUh/wduzH920kEX7/AerZqKOg8V/5s9BREXESdMSMtLpHUihgLN ll4sSknbBH+lM3bBOSDfi09LwBSB4bUj8Eh4Y3Ur0wV0+8/0XDvXtHY1j5MgZZcb0FMgnO/J6ZwP hI4bglUO6CTaFDGgwK2gQ4vVasODA0f5POfsq/ALMMPjfkUae3E5BncMrLeLBQl2f2yt2fzGElLt s8bRzPaHgtgjJAK5yV5gOBISJ2nJbazzft6K1xyYfA==
    =IXnU
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrei POPESCU@21:1/5 to Paul Gevers on Sat Sep 25 10:00:02 2021
    On Vi, 24 sep 21, 20:11:15, Paul Gevers wrote:
    Hi Andrei,

    On 24-09-2021 08:18, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
    Would you mind if I commit such trivial-but-obvious fixes directly?

    If you're really sure, yes, go ahead. Making sure somebody from the
    release team (me) is aware would be *really* appreciated.

    Should that (B)Cc: -release or do you prefer direct message instead?

    Is there something else to consider (besides fixing existing translations)?

    Around the release (i.e. half a year before and until we branched off) I
    try to be nice to translators and leave mistakes in the original in to
    avoid creating too much fuzzy translations, unless I can fix the
    original in the translations too (like I did this time).

    As a (too busy for this release) translator myself, this is very much appreciated.

    Kind regards,
    Andrei
    --
    http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE5E64jOIbhY42OXqk/8eFRO8iNBwFAmFO1s4ACgkQ/8eFRO8i NBy/YhAAjeOnLnXMN3zjQvGmaQJAnfZlTdRLQR3+mEYi41Wb++19i0A+3pKzBGIA 8AWcm8RiaYaBtCK63YNOsd1OlG4yTZncQXbb1v0Kcm+K39wR0lgNyMRqnvEIsKW9 K7norXtJ1CeDu7KlvaL+6OUdm0/0N9GmzKiJqbu5X00U9NU63yhgeBkhNjLoBg8S eKWfkzSzNPEipjOvrcEtYYjHTxxcnOcrcshyHbvgt2hcczStWGLIlpaZrGjSTk7Y TZ8MTeRwvK983QnGvr8LbyviQXNMBlVpURfnu9tqQVYaua9IyA5kajLbgIgZ3pyy o6ow69dnESnHlfYRcuiuL5ARNDlAKGlW09tstIkywL1HbX62AosJyuf1XMAbfE5T AQ2nQ7RIg1KrIDh2aShg+GqS4JrKXFjk1sUJNXG9nsK3KB1oHBsdBf+OIkp1EaUn BNmu3vTzDwNz3SqFzX6chnqAwOnWzzOlPrKPsF+UDNI03lWjNpaGqwAxPD6XPq9f IJSCQw8TubbwXrTcDNZ+G01CgA983sX7K5vLABS0G60WYbNVYwfRM0UR4iJdMCtF JT0hYhj1dJzzkAJe1N9RGGWNq1+vdKupm4sV9tmhmojPkbJP7vklDc4Fq+VrkmUd Tz0gcWyCXgTglAKDxy3n+jMhJ99A52MS7EmtPRVGnGLgMKPcu/I=
    =pmZO
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul Gevers@21:1/5 to Andrei POPESCU on Sat Sep 25 21:20:01 2021
    Copy: [email protected]

    This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --016l39d4Dk99gs1P0UyWA0cKaHgDPTxvq
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
    Content-Language: en-US
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    Hi

    On 25-09-2021 09:59, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
    If you're really sure, yes, go ahead. Making sure somebody from the
    release team (me) is aware would be *really* appreciated.

    Should that (B)Cc: -release or do you prefer direct message instead?

    I think the best thing is to make sure that debian-doc is CC'd. Somebody (currently me) from the release team should really be watching that list.

    Paul


    --016l39d4Dk99gs1P0UyWA0cKaHgDPTxvq--

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    wsB5BAABCAAjFiEEWLZtSHNr6TsFLeZynFyZ6wW9dQoFAmFPdE4FAwAAAAAACgkQnFyZ6wW9dQpH 6wgAvP88vwzuD4BdiZnIiMekbxQLGK+CWIiD3/n+AaEime+o6uEqBmP2QBa5Rw437PrpApG499kC 55HyRpc37X3W3DzCUcpPqSdY62+rp2uTcLOedUpnRkVrwD2/xvsEtsZcqCF4n0O1q/9h3qI6/7TY BWeehG4nhgpFdlfqMvO9YcxW3U6YRaeGcB0vkuBYn5mYmQVsXF7hxRhdLcLaoDEEXH1KIouyiDY8 frYCBwIVjHhLi41+eg1sQ5FQtTbO+J7ViUSq55SPAuXb6s7w9gF8rcLBaSiAVyZVeyw/7GH8rpf8 bKEd2UXz1/5bZb9bYkGCV21KwYVX35P1486RQiPIBw==
    =GVei
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrei POPESCU@21:1/5 to Paul Gevers on Sun Sep 26 11:00:02 2021
    On Sb, 25 sep 21, 21:11:10, Paul Gevers wrote:
    Hi

    On 25-09-2021 09:59, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
    If you're really sure, yes, go ahead. Making sure somebody from the
    release team (me) is aware would be *really* appreciated.

    Should that (B)Cc: -release or do you prefer direct message instead?

    I think the best thing is to make sure that debian-doc is CC'd. Somebody (currently me) from the release team should really be watching that list.

    Ok, Cc: -doc or the bug where applicable (and with the same end effect)
    was implied ;)

    Kind regards,
    Andrei
    --
    http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE5E64jOIbhY42OXqk/8eFRO8iNBwFAmFQNWQACgkQ/8eFRO8i NByj9RAAofGZXy4ZMy8IcFDajMdAjDLS8LE1jZlZOQk2JRbivX4XCUbjbj2nk3M9 5XMoWMPj/1y/IVDajcSK7FB9fhyRJOvsiyT1XGN7VlOUVEbOepThmY90nR219tlM Z0P82KXL9WgWHur5dquCLZ8LKEpC+qjaIl2gnJ3zYWIaEp0/M2C9DwZp+lIp5Yo5 OiPIbVsPb8mligUuqVHq6ApaUZF4AMR7t63QkEl3kKj5ujihfAwvGOzBXrvCQzUm kjZC1mnYBouwWxA99AyYwNDoI7HwFGOdE/dafW7rF/VeDLsrNWPOmaVxU97SbJf9 RdIXlayCxf6FbiFZUSL7Z+LsgkNRvbrlgfx5bABTg1+MVoCq15MLmYb/VS3J167/ IDPFSyuh5xRHqtEt1nVdO6LsHCJMZ8vJfS3dQah8FJZDFVQxXyH1Qthg7HsO2MXs fbzE3s1pjZOHVWJhXZQYNEmtb/9GBTLHRgcto0gz5WVJ0jKYrGn8ueU6y1s0Er58 5SwNaQjXUH/36taivrFOMKLv2D5lLbrK6UzGt5uHXQiMctYajxciBfQUnX2it4Mt cf2O5tb6RXBaqGNTl4PeL0zOgVwa1hTPMkNFZWIoIXa4M75PZQsuNtzcSepXDKGh jk1hP+7ZnW8cTVTb16aM3z2OoTZqxE5bFxYmtEV0ZF9yWbcJIcE=
    =hZhE
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)