1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.DEVEL

  • Re: Ready stage for DD review/sponsoring - Too many DDs may spoil the b

    From Phil Wyett@21:1/5 to Andrey Rakhmatullin on Fri Jul 12 08:10:01 2024
    XPost: linux.debian.devel.mentors

    On Fri, 2024-07-12 at 10:44 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
    On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 05:54:59AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
    Morning all,

    As we embark on a new process where packages submitted to mentors are reviewed
    and brought to a "Ready" stage for then busy DDs who are gracious enough to give
    their time to review and possibly sponsor into Debian. We have a unique problem
    (one which is now a nice one to have to be honest :-)) where more than one DD
    may input on the same package review.

    Could submitters to mentors and DDs please ensure that only one DD is working on
    a package. This is to avoid conflicting info and also not waste valuable DD time. If a package is taken, please find another to work on, as there are many
    at the "Ready" stage.

    Do you also suggest to not review packages one isn't going to sponsor? Or
    how should this work?


    Morning Andrey,

    Anyone can review packages, that has been part of mentors forever really. But whoever does review a package, I would hope they see it through its journey.

    * For non DDs. Hopefully take it to that ready stage where a DD can then take over and finish a packages journey.

    * For DDs. Hopefully take a package on prior to or at the ready stage and take it through its full journey.

    Is this reasonable?

    Regards

    Phil

    --

    "I play the game for the game’s own sake"

    Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans

    --

    Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas

    Website: https://kathenas.org

    Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/

    Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg

    --


    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQJOBAABCgA4FiEEcKCsRax3nv6E9jrtckqptS8CTIsFAmaQxrsaHHBoaWxpcC53 eWV0dEBrYXRoZW5hcy5vcmcACgkQckqptS8CTIv42g//SGUiGKIKTrRIgE0eN0Go 4tVguXRVNOK27Yj2iADQyZl0CQme2GZD2jgjDmEjlUMhp1Pc8r/vVtX/kud8F3FF CMMDELHViI4rkGi0mVLIcWBcO+LxvkDEd0eBjb0L8Jdb9k4/0D1c0dsFJkBXH3OQ n5inS+RDdNwIudbHBrnZmbUP8MOyJzLI1fOALW05vsEHDFJ1FpjVIdbAeQiG/Owc XIsuN3ZjWkIaWGgp0mbqyq8CQLrrQD+Oqtxk9IdEMd66IoTZe82qRA+y42ndewTk nWgXdT/Ai7EcJeL6rEPxBX72K5E7aYGjJdxq7fJ8mw6W4CgVs8Jq/v4WJS++TKKZ 417dJP3MJLpEwkPfHQCs6sYxjUl8ce73bJYaoKhIJOK9BfrdmEYcVkGGtAdm5kBY HeYBuLPeXFzxKoFOfLkqK/s0QxzDJDXKWMT+sQnoElUnnVm8/HBCf0rabotOj2P3 c0Uc9QbDUspqt7n4+Nzw9fH+EJliuuuVi2zVhsiWE8FU4awA7iV+cQEBPc9HZTzP ZuI5oFRSyRZWkTBTa
  • From Andrey Rakhmatullin@21:1/5 to Phil Wyett on Fri Jul 12 07:50:01 2024
    XPost: linux.debian.devel.mentors

    On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 05:54:59AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
    Morning all,

    As we embark on a new process where packages submitted to mentors are reviewed
    and brought to a "Ready" stage for then busy DDs who are gracious enough to give
    their time to review and possibly sponsor into Debian. We have a unique problem
    (one which is now a nice one to have to be honest :-)) where more than one DD may input on the same package review.

    Could submitters to mentors and DDs please ensure that only one DD is working on
    a package. This is to avoid conflicting info and also not waste valuable DD time. If a package is taken, please find another to work on, as there are many
    at the "Ready" stage.

    Do you also suggest to not review packages one isn't going to sponsor? Or
    how should this work?

    --
    WBR, wRAR

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQJhBAABCgBLFiEEolIP6gqGcKZh3YxVM2L3AxpJkuEFAmaQwsMtFIAAAAAAFQAP cGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3Jnd3JhckBkZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEDNi9wMaSZLh z84P/0OLGjGVhTs2OCj9n2ZxN5YXE/rHWcxvMAJheH3PQ6pcGsgZWqkc6dKlBfSK 9A/t+x2qPgQSOKqOB4rkxep5Jn4MtshxGjmvqOYZwnjnHR7a/PG/0W1l14ZQIFiM lEQhBTCfEAu6nFpYiTO2/QuTpuEdvw5WpL5wI6JMSrur4sR1FmVTT+cK9kQt65NP Lvde2D+RQhUy8axui547U4uhu5zlGlBQLvZf4m2+NAsFBsel+/QooCpQ1JvitLeo v4dnKf8Hz3bGUhcYp9+RF0bPEAIBIiEpPqCc5BN+krN9lm98LXPSRSTbg9wxaS3E 4RG+mqMEphn8SimoaomB4fNntzyvfW03jDOGSBys3L7Om1Pd1ErDq9BR1gAVAaKw R/rWYPwxbtYCbVBF5NgPX9KiPxLLR7imnXu7RIk+nkEGZGrmAYXMI1bubvEBZma0 AXuTL6VtDha9D750ZtOsFp7phpvDLydTolLCA1DyB3a5VYUBpotKfwkPPdZnDa00 lEnhF3fyU/qaXEOANaXwTE36LkYT555Fszts+Mc+5aaLSu6swFjdIb5qvED+VNwR IsTkFNUtbN74tOn2GpsmxEKkkEdkWnxivBDDt+1vz5l0wKOSo2nngUlK356jeuXr eimZik0oz2A4WNgvPKw9A4SDlpRcwjwQKeetVY4QuFwy4ZJn
    =3e4T
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrey Rakhmatullin@21:1/5 to Phil Wyett on Fri Jul 12 09:10:02 2024
    On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 07:01:41AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
    As we embark on a new process where packages submitted to mentors are reviewed
    and brought to a "Ready" stage for then busy DDs who are gracious enough to give
    their time to review and possibly sponsor into Debian. We have a unique problem
    (one which is now a nice one to have to be honest :-)) where more than one DD
    may input on the same package review.

    Could submitters to mentors and DDs please ensure that only one DD is working on
    a package. This is to avoid conflicting info and also not waste valuable DD
    time. If a package is taken, please find another to work on, as there are many
    at the "Ready" stage.

    Do you also suggest to not review packages one isn't going to sponsor? Or how should this work?


    Morning Andrey,

    Anyone can review packages, that has been part of mentors forever really. But whoever does review a package, I would hope they see it through its journey.

    * For non DDs. Hopefully take it to that ready stage where a DD can then take over and finish a packages journey.

    * For DDs. Hopefully take a package on prior to or at the ready stage and take
    it through its full journey.

    Is this reasonable?

    Yeah, it's reasonable, I won't do drive-by reviews in the future.


    --
    WBR, wRAR

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQJhBAABCgBLFiEEolIP6gqGcKZh3YxVM2L3AxpJkuEFAmaQ1kotFIAAAAAAFQAP cGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3Jnd3JhckBkZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEDNi9wMaSZLh 6HcP/RVj9RBzgYvUEVVnnFB/W27wd3sCiH981HwIkgSAJpoPkZttFY0/acx1gniW 3j3dDYpCttGdxfwiiWw/+XFlMpQ/0yNQZGyKtuWryDC0Nt7SeVQW+lWwL8yt6Qcl e3qUZr2Hgn7sHf1zBcx++iPKgHsK3lElAq+uvlQa/gBgWJH/R7l8qY1EjEEOX5Np MamWXiW0wp6xSygESY8/p8Xev+Y3lsHHq+6PRzAs6KBjJEHZMFBgLzIQntzoGsYS 1YjzbzpKKT5QaJ83B80Fcv+/bBAGxhedU+NQ/FkylQMKebegaRHbbnsS+515K/bo h8yw0J43cJTCq9a9biAlnPJWl62jkVfaJ/yFtJcfnMLCpL2TVsYW6jNewuN7ejwL rxfZw2IwaCqFJDF2eXSc4KZvbWmKu+QQ8qMe4TGkbWsnkOU36DCpoKqwXhsuquYj HmH0pC4XLXkEb2rO+c1vlJIcNUi54ye4c/MymR7EpNLhL+dWywra1QGzASMuz2cv bALoqfsdbbLh7WC77OVmhtIpQ08bHprAxIKJXVgtOd6gsGPPIZGxcfYvkqN2rayH tihJHWdQaxyIHJw932djTTwft9kgpB8sWg1fmUgl68Ulj620XQvER10HGYcgqpAP jhgf7TmxyxT4B0MTs/td/+4qoVYYc8abMYSJHzHgzxVptaBp
    =Sv6J
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)