1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.DEVEL

  • Re: questionable massive auto-removal: buggy deps nvidia-graphics-drive

    From Paul Gevers@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 24 20:40:01 2022
    This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --------------yR016eqqLlPvtiA3wbq6uI2V
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

    SGksDQoNCk9uIDI0LTA1LTIwMjIgMjA6MDcsIE0uIFpob3Ugd3JvdGU6DQo+IEkgd29uZGVy IHdoeSBhbiBpcnJlbGV2YW50IHBhY2thZ2Ugc3VkZGVubHkgdHJpZ2dlcmVkIGF1dG9yZW1v dmFsDQo+IG9mIGEgdmVyeSBsYXJnZSBwb3J0aW9uIG9mIHBhY2thZ2VzIGZyb20gdGVzdGlu Zy4NCj4gDQo+IGh0dHBzOi8vdWRkLmRlYmlhbi5vcmcvY2dpLWJpbi9hdXRvcmVtb3ZhbHMu Y2dpDQo+IFNlYXJjaGVkIGZvciBrZXl3b3JkIG52aWRpYS1ncmFwaGljcy1kcml2ZXJzLXRl c2xhLTQ3MCwgYW5kIEkgZ290DQo+IDY4ODY2IGVudHJpZXMuIFRoZXJlIG11c3QgYmUgc29t ZXRoaW5nIHdyb25nLg0KDQpodHRwczovL2J1Z3MuZGViaWFuLm9yZy8xMDExMjY4IChidXQg YXBwYXJlbnRseSBteSBmaXJzdCBhc3N1bXB0aW9uIHdhcyANCndyb25nIGFuZCBpdCdzIGFu b3RoZXIgYnVnLCBtb3N0IGxpa2VseSBTaW1vbiB3YXMgcmlnaHQuDQoNClBhdWwNCg==

    --------------yR016eqqLlPvtiA3wbq6uI2V--

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    wsB5BAABCAAjFiEEWLZtSHNr6TsFLeZynFyZ6wW9dQoFAmKNJUYFAwAAAAAACgkQnFyZ6wW9dQqi dQgAhR3m1ImfkgVgx7ZBUSMqtoPCtq3RRmui2HTb/AHj3/xem1/7Pq/cuppjIUhaphdlxhY1hSwC aCPfcX7SLyvcmbc2Es6vqOvU4GQS8A6QP1agphR5bfodhfNK+aEf2oE7O9Yjj3v9lRo3eROStHFv hDXaqGHBqVHE96ncn+JyY9JHt6wYSLQi+jnI3516wnCLo4qToyYBabcSenpqoVUWrfKrMBGLCAP5 Nc+UM8R594Khh8102EVM5FGUkk/pW3l4RFqRNZrLMf7hf4ZTk5PigxQTYdn2JX5wgMqVWsrrhrWZ Giy6ga65hy/xh2duOwnIIqQLHI4nyZaC5DYQO+AwWw==
    =Yw4X
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From [email protected]@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 26 08:50:01 2022
    Le jeudi 26 mai 2022 à 09:32 +0300, Timo Lindfors a écrit :

    On 5/24/22 21:34, Paul Gevers wrote:
    https://bugs.debian.org/1011268 (but apparently my first assumption
    was wrong and it's another bug, most likely Simon was right.

    Thanks for the link. I was quite puzzled this morning when I saw
    several removals messages.

    Several is an understatement... it's pouring in.

    Perhaps the autoremoval watch could *STOP* sending mails until the
    problem is fixed?!

    Cheers,

    J.Puydt

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timo Lindfors@21:1/5 to Paul Gevers on Thu May 26 08:50:02 2022
    On 5/24/22 21:34, Paul Gevers wrote:
    https://bugs.debian.org/1011268 (but apparently my first assumption
    was wrong and it's another bug, most likely Simon was right.

    Thanks for the link. I was quite puzzled this morning when I saw several removals messages. I guess I should just wait and hope that the removals
    don't actually happen.

    -Timo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul Gevers@21:1/5 to Debian Devel on Fri May 27 09:50:02 2022
    This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --------------NZJzjS1tDxdlb0EOkdsVgVHP
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

    SGkgYWxsLA0KDQpPbiAyNy0wNS0yMDIyIDA5OjQyLCBKdWxpZW4gUHV5ZHQgd3JvdGU6DQo+ ICAgICAuLi4gb3IgZ2VuZXJhdGUgYSBibGFja2xpc3Qgb2YgcGFja2FnZXMgdGhhdCBzaG91 bGQgbm90IHRyaWdnZXINCj4gICAgIHRob3NlIHJlbW92YWxzLg0KDQpUaGF0IGV4aXN0czog a2V5IHBhY2thZ2VzLg0KDQo+IE9yIHRoZSByZW1vdmFsIHdhdGNoZXIgY291bGQgaGF2ZSBh IGNhcCBvbiB0aGUgbnVtYmVyIG9mIHdhcm5pbmdzIGl0IA0KPiBzZW5kcyBwZXIgc2Vuc2li bGUgcGVyaW9kIG9mIHRpbWUuIElmIGl0IGV4Y2VlZHMgdGhpcyBudW1iZXIsIGl0IHNlbmRz IGEgDQo+IHNwZWNpYWwgd2FybmluZyB0aGF0IHNvbWV0aGluZyBpcyBhbWlzcyB0byBkZWJp YW4tZGV2ZWwsIHNvIHdlIHN0aWxsIGdldCANCj4gdG8ga25vdyBzb21ldGhpbmcgaXMgZ29p bmcgd3JvbmcuDQoNClBhdGNoZXMgd2VsY29tZS4gQ29kZSBpcyBoZXJlOiANCmh0dHBzOi8v c2Fsc2EuZGViaWFuLm9yZy9yZWxlYXNlLXRlYW0vcmVsZWFzZS10b29scy8tL2Jsb2IvbWFz dGVyL21haWxlci9tYWlsX2F1dG9yZW1vdmFscy5wbA0KDQpQYXVsDQo=

    --------------NZJzjS1tDxdlb0EOkdsVgVHP--

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    wsB5BAABCAAjFiEEWLZtSHNr6TsFLeZynFyZ6wW9dQoFAmKQgmgFAwAAAAAACgkQnFyZ6wW9dQpO dAgAi3KuDR+wbdLai//KJu+drBZaH0YauZb/X8L3dfyM/hrra+TD9qCg4E3qqAzBFY2x6s/rNmQl YMrtnh4C1GTGvFuR5N643PuGw7yvxBuvfCwJsSDHgKa6FJbpu/L4rvJU99Q3ENcfsGE21Z8ZcNSk xDHQnpDWGKVrwhBYxu31S7uvir1OKmh4Yyp/1zztrwY6ZWV5Md7TiO523yj8qf4BlFxHORoL/cPF lbuXFfhX65vAU7uzzPg37OwjpptiLyjAWqyF+OLRlFdX4QkVEGUEIGS2K2/zBS4cWfa/xz8k1Ip5 PwhJzLX4n9u2HuwFj506GbR/b5C0VK0sg0SXqjBd+g==
    =74wr
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bastian Venthur@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 28 22:10:01 2022
    Hi,

    sorry I didn't follow the conversation but it seems that all my Python
    packages are still not migrating to testing and I don't really
    understand how to fix it. The error I see consistently in my Python
    packages is:

    Issues preventing migration:
    Not built on buildd: arch all binaries uploaded by venthur, a new source-only upload is needed to allow migration

    I've re-uploaded all packages a few days ago, but the error is still the
    same.

    So is there a way to fix this on my and or is this a problem somewhere
    else and I just need to wait?


    Cheers,

    Bastian

    Am 24.05.22 um 20:07 schrieb M. Zhou:
    I wonder why an irrelevant package suddenly triggered autoremoval
    of a very large portion of packages from testing.

    https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/autoremovals.cgi
    Searched for keyword nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470, and I got
    68866 entries. There must be something wrong.

    https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470
    Looking at the bug report of the package itself, and it does not
    look like glibc package is made broken by it.

    Any idea?




    --
    Dr. Bastian Venthur https://venthur.de
    Debian Developer venthur at debian org

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From [email protected]@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 28 22:20:01 2022
    Le mardi 28 juin 2022 à 22:08 +0200, Bastian Venthur a écrit :
    Hi,

    sorry I didn't follow the conversation but it seems that all my
    Python
    packages are still not migrating to testing and I don't really
    understand how to fix it. The error I see consistently in my Python
    packages is:

    Issues preventing migration:
    Not built on buildd: arch all binaries uploaded by venthur, a new source-only upload is needed to allow migration

    I've re-uploaded all packages a few days ago, but the error is still
    the same.

    Wild guess: were your new uploads _*source-only*_ ?

    Cheers,

    J.Puydt

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul Gevers@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 28 22:30:01 2022
    This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --------------uCyN2GrSp50soBuOH2a5EWOQ
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

    SGkNCg0KT24gMjgtMDYtMjAyMiAyMjoxNywgU2NvdHQgVGFsYmVydCB3cm90ZToNCj4gQWxs IHVwbG9hZHMgbmVlZCB0byBiZSBzb3VyY2Utb25seSAoc2luY2UgDQo+IGJ1bGxzZXllPyku DQoNClRvIGJlIG1vcmUgY29ycmVjdCwgYWxsIHBhY2thZ2UgdGhhdCBhcmUgaW50ZW5kZWQg dG8gbWlncmF0ZSB0byB0ZXN0aW5nIA0KbmVlZCB0byBiZSBzb3VyY2Utb25seS4gSG93ZXZl ciwgaW4gdGhlIHJldmlldyBwcm9jZXNzIG9mIE5FVyBiaW5hcmllcywgDQp0aGUgdXBsb2Fk IHN0aWxsIG5lZWRzIHRvIGNvbnRhaW4gYWxsIChhbmQgb25lIGFyY2gpIGJpbmFyaWVzIGZv ciB0aGUgDQpmdHAtbWFzdGVyIHRvIHJldmlldy4NCg0KVGhlcmUgYXJlIHBhdGNoZXMgdG8g c3VwcG9ydCB0aHJvdyBhd2F5IGJpbmFyaWVzLCBidXQgYXMgZmFyIGFzIEknbSANCmF3YXJl IHRoZXkgaGF2ZW4ndCBiZWVuIG1lcmdlZCBhbmQgSSBkb24ndCBrbm93IHRoZSBzdGF0dXMg b2YgdGhlIA0KcGF0Y2hlcy4gVGhhdCB3b24ndCByZW1vdmUgdGhlIG5lZWQgZm9yIGJpbmFy eSB1cGxvYWRzLCBidXQgaXQgd291bGQgDQpyZW1vdmUgdGhlIG5lZWQgZm9yIGEgcmUtdXBs b2FkLg0KDQpQYXVsDQo=

    --------------uCyN2GrSp50soBuOH2a5EWOQ--

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    wsB5BAABCAAjFiEEWLZtSHNr6TsFLeZynFyZ6wW9dQoFAmK7Y0AFAwAAAAAACgkQnFyZ6wW9dQr4 ZAgAkAuDGWR0gd6WQjlgpEccz5bWRdBtwJgkUGSTOxwoDa/Mr9uTzC4zC9LOEZn+fpGWLTyOsS68 sZwsWgquH37CdrgByMh9lruA5/4qnt7pAJzh7LdhoaYekL4ngALZ6vSQ7IPmv04QOTjMmViPgmRE dsX2f2wTNi1GhaZ18FGJQpl6nPtZ3AYMGUeGhhk4lMwITAjNMfwcRB//dCw7IZ76A9K36YHIUXgT B2d+1XcdniNnAFMVVPN3IRlcD3F+40Z/gfpas36vgDdFszR3F9KxV+EXmmvPOwY2W0jnYHYuwtHF ANVTqyVdxBeybfu6MgtTzsz5CUjvT/gjl3NrS27hHg==
    =jrne
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From [email protected]@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 28 22:30:01 2022
    Le mardi 28 juin 2022 à 16:17 -0400, Scott Talbert a écrit :
    On Tue, 28 Jun 2022, [email protected] wrote:

    Wild guess: were your new uploads _*source-only*_ ?

    I looked at a couple of them and they were (source all) so that does
    appear to be the problem.  All uploads need to be source-only (since bullseye?).

    Except uploads to NEW... which isn't 100% logical in my opinion.

    Cheers,

    J.Puydt

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Talbert@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Tue Jun 28 22:20:01 2022
    This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
    while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

    On Tue, 28 Jun 2022, [email protected] wrote:

    Hi,

    sorry I didn't follow the conversation but it seems that all my
    Python
    packages are still not migrating to testing and I don't really
    understand how to fix it. The error I see consistently in my Python
    packages is:

    Issues preventing migration:
    Not built on buildd: arch all binaries uploaded by venthur, a new
    source-only upload is needed to allow migration

    I've re-uploaded all packages a few days ago, but the error is still
    the same.

    Wild guess: were your new uploads _*source-only*_ ?

    I looked at a couple of them and they were (source all) so that does
    appear to be the problem. All uploads need to be source-only (since bullseye?).

    Scott

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul Wise@21:1/5 to Paul Gevers on Wed Jun 29 02:40:01 2022
    On Tue, 2022-06-28 at 22:23 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:

    There are patches to support throw away binaries, but as far as I'm
    aware they haven't been merged and I don't know the status of the
    patches. That won't remove the need for binary uploads, but it would
    remove the need for a re-upload.

    The patches for discarding NEW binaries have been merged in 2020 but
    the configuration to enable discarding NEW binaries wasn't enabled.

    https://salsa.debian.org/ftp-team/dak/-/merge_requests/184

    --
    bye,
    pabs

    https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEYQsotVz8/kXqG1Y7MRa6Xp/6aaMFAmK7ngQACgkQMRa6Xp/6 aaOKsA//cutN4GJUhv73FJ8JpGRcf0qLeMeY8ATArJ4lCgwCt/yGTEBK14T/GQTs YJC5nu+30bMIdEiK7Sbt15NteRltljbigzrixog85hHEEMH7h2klQWfNpD7ja7Qm 4lCEW6Lq/V0OgTiiqNFxtc0GY7scrU0lB+GktNyt+P7xK7JgT9A4kRDG1734r4LR ifhwaq2Cp5APthEKsOLTpz2MMKWM92DST44DLkDbgNd132ggPn7DSTC4IMmOLBID 9DmXZ/koWwlKptatDMvgmll+GvlN6ntxL9Sx4CIAfl9swnKf8cxCCZoZXP/OZlFF Vp6ZWXqet40kk0TVkh0FNQ/4hzATz3BXwGAqo+S8CFDXojxmlgwExvXcWn1Fdyrp tjq26sGZvD+ZrMsBU0zUoi8FuP2iAqgtAnnoDO+frQ/xhYp1CZaXkvRQeWsh69My u8XJirrogBKX6+52wyNHLaqVMr+Oz7MXxOAg9U2ymLM2Zaf7IXhtqWgOgWqRaRrs /dG20mIx9dqs/ukXfrSLGK/KFxXAex3u2wnNR2f84JmkynJ3RKeP1x445fCX6DHa KzIPLlGjPakm4p0CsVmXSnmhWQ2E1zH/f+sNZ0O3cXSvzlkpQhYZOuv+Gsynq6A3 sRgD5nyaH9pEtfZ8SS7qy93P2muBVnPH0p9pJwojDvNjOBcIoRw=
    =dzQI
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bastian Venthur@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 29 21:40:01 2022
    Am 28.06.22 um 22:15 schrieb [email protected]:
    Le mardi 28 juin 2022 à 22:08 +0200, Bastian Venthur a écrit :
    Wild guess: were your new uploads _*source-only*_ ?

    Good point! I totally forgot about that :)

    Thanks,

    Bastian


    --
    Dr. Bastian Venthur https://venthur.de
    Debian Developer venthur at debian org

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)