Hi,
I think Salsa CI is a great tool for rebuilding all the reverse build dependencies
of a given package (here nodejs, but it applies to all others).
Unfortunately, the current salsa gitlab runners available are not scaled to
be
able to handle that use case.
Of course, ideally, it would be great if all salsa teams could do that
kind of task
using shared runners, or perhaps another group of shared runners, different from
the one used to do pure CI.
Finding some sponsors willing to provide some server resources for runners should be doable, but it raises some questions:
- how can a sponsor advertise its participation to Debian ? Is there a
legal framework for this ?
- is it ok if we have runners that are only meant to be used by a salsa
team ?
Regards,
Jérémy
<div dir="ltr">Hi,<div><br></div><div>I think Salsa CI is a great tool for rebuilding all the reverse build dependencies</div><div>of a given package (here nodejs, but it applies to all others).</div><div>Unfortunately, the current salsa gitlab runners
available are not scaled to be</div><div>able to handle that use case.</div><div><div>Of course, ideally, it would be great if all salsa teams could do that kind of task</div><div>using shared runners, or perhaps another group of shared runners,
different from</div><div>the one used to do pure CI.</div></div><div>Finding some sponsors willing to provide some server resources for runners</div><div>should be doable, but it raises some questions:</div><div>- how can a sponsor advertise its
participation to Debian ? Is there a legal framework for this ?</div><div>- is it ok if we have runners that are only meant to be used by a salsa team ?</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Jérémy</div><div><br></div></div>
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)