On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 09:31:51PM +0000, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
Package: fortunes-es-off
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Hi, Andrew,
Looking how imperative bug title sounds I thought I missed a GR on this or
at least a detailed discussion with a clear conclusion before this bug is
filed with this severity. The only thing I found was this thread in debian-project
https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2023/08/threads.html#00044
This thread started after fortunes-off removal and I think it had no clear conclusion, leaving to maintainers to decide on individual -off packages.
You are one of the contributors, so I will not go into the details.
I am not current fortunes-es maintainer, but did some work in initial steps
of the package and have been tracking it since then. I prepared initial
version of the off section trying to strip everything that I considered
not apropriate even for this section (explicit calls for violence should not
be here, as well as things of too low quality). I added some fortunes with
fun on males or females that I considered could even get a smile from
supposed target. They are in the off package only because some people have a very low offense threshold and this helps to deal with this.
So, I fully agree with fortunes-it-off maintainer when closing #1109167 and #1109165. Package is not automatically installed and AFAIR there has never
been complaints about anyone that was offended by this -off package, so
should be fine.
There may be bad fortunes that were not detected by my filters at that time or by maintainer's filters later. If so, please file bug reports on them. Regarding this bug report I would close it as fortunes-it-off bug has been closed.
Regards,
--
Agustin
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)