• Bug#1065416: Scheduling a meeting/BoF at DebConf 25

    From Helmut Grohne@21:1/5 to Stefano Rivera on Sat Jul 12 16:40:02 2025
    Hello,

    On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 01:14:12PM +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
    I'm inviting Bastian, Matthias, and Aurelien to participate in a structured discussion of the pending issues here.

    I happen to have met Bastian already and we had a wonderful time
    exchanging ideas and reasons. Thank you, Bastian! Note that I have a
    subtly different focus from the issue referred to the CTTE due to my
    work on rebootstrap. For the benefit of others, I'll be summarizing some
    of the insights I gained. The conversation and this summary was on
    happening with CTTE hats.

    A minor aspect I was not aware of is that Canonical approached Bastian
    about turning linux-libc-dev Arch:all. I don't know the exact details,
    but we might reach out there if we want to understand it in more depth.

    As multiple of us already suspected, package/installation/archive size
    is not an aspected that seemed important to Bastian. Indeed, he
    recognizes that the typical installation grows as a result of
    linux-libc-dev being Arch:all without seeing that as an advantage.

    He explained the use of linux-libc-dev in Debian ports to me. It seems
    like dak's architecture validation lags behind the one of dpkg in
    unstable severely to the point where dak does not know about the some of
    the architectures that we presently track as ports architectures. As a
    result, you cannot mention them in an Architecture field to be uploaded
    to unstable and this poses a significant problem to ports wishing to
    have a working linux-libc-dev package when it still was
    architecture-dependent. Switching to Arch:all enabled them to get their
    patches into src:linux as dak would no longer reject the package.

    I do relate to this argument, but I think it should be solvable on a
    technical level whilst the social side to it may be challenging on its
    own.

    We also briefly went into the ownership of the linux-libc-dev-ARCH-cross
    matter that is the subject of this CTTE matter, but we quickly concluded
    that it would be better to discuss that aspect in the larger setting
    scheduled by Stefano.

    So much from me

    Helmut

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)