• Bug#259373: comments on installation-report (1/2)

    From Martin Domeij@1:229/2 to All on Sat Aug 14 16:10:09 2004
    XPost: linux.debian.maint.boot
    From: [email protected]

    Hello,

    I wrote the installation report below exactly one month ago, and have
    since come to the realization that it probably requires some more
    comments. This is attempt to give some further explanation and comments.

    First off - the installation report itself. I have learned that a lot of
    people misunderstood and put X's in stead of O's and E's on the checklist.
    I did so myself until I read the instructions *below* the checklist. I
    then corrected this, but seem to have missed the last one. I think it
    would help if the instructions were located above the checklist.

    What struck me as a general problem going through the different windows
    was the amount of text on each one. A lot of text, some it explanatory
    and some if it quite not as explanatory. I think that the texts should
    be briefer and more to the point. I didn't read all of them because of
    this.

    Then I felt that if I deviated from the path I had a hard time getting
    back on it. Finding my way to the main menu was only possible if
    something went wrong or if I canceled something, which it interpreted as
    if something had gone wrong. I don't really know how to improve this,
    but some sort of "escape back to main menu" option would be nice I
    suppose.

    Something a bit more specific was the fact that never got to choose
    country. I suspect this had to do with the fact that I chose Language
    en_US. However, just because I live in Sweden doesn't necessarily mean
    that I want my OS in Swedish and just because I want it in American
    English doesn't mean I live in the US. I'm suspecting that this
    assumption was also what lead to the presentation of only US timezones
    later on.

    Where I work I sometimes deploy a server into a subnet with a DHCP
    server present. Obviously, DHCP on a server is not normally what you
    want. For at least this scenario, and probably others, I think that
    having a manual IP-address or not should be a choice.

    Getting up towards Grub/Lilo i had some difficulty actually choosing
    Lilo, as stated. I've never fully understood Grub and Lilo works fine, so
    I've never seen the reason to switch. With Grub the default option it
    could be a bit easier to choose Lilo instead.

    I realize that after the first reboot it's not D-I anymore, but I wasn't
    aware of this at the time and was a bit puzzled about why it asked me
    about hostname again, for instance.

    I installed with D-I from a CD, or rather from an image of a CD in
    VMWare. With very few exceptions, I always install Woody with B-F from floppies, and really have no other option, since a lot of disk is more important that a CD-reader in the machines I install. From what I gather
    the number of driver disk is not *4* in D-I as in B-F, which of course
    is nice.

    I realize that one of your top design goals is to create an installer
    that is actually possible to maintain, but I can't really comment on
    that since I don't develop and don't really wish to. I can't really
    comment on how it appears to the new debian user either, since I'm not
    one. All I can say is that, sure, it did its job, kinda just like B-F
    always did, with a few quirks but all in all all right. I'm not as
    excited about it as I have heard a lot of people are, but maybe that's symptomatic; I'm more excited about Debian itself than actually
    installing it. If need ever be, I guess I actually will install it by
    putting a tarball onto an empty filesystem, run lilo and rejoice.

    So, did D-I did anything for me that that B-F didn't? Well, it probed my network card. That has never bothered me much since I usally know the
    hardware in the machines I install. What was more interesting to me was
    whether it could install on a mirror set or not. Thus far, with B-F,
    I have installed Woody on one disk and then manually copied data and
    created the mirrors.

    Improvement over B-F? Some more features I suppose, yes, but easier/faster/better for me to use? Well, if I don't have to load
    four driver disks and set up my mirror sets manually, perhaps.

    /Martin


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:35:13 +0200 (CEST)
    From: Martin Domeij <[email protected]>
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: installation-reports

    Package: installation-reports

    Debian-installer-version: Dowloaded it 2004-07-13. See Method.
    uname -a: Linux sid 2.4.25-1-386 #2 Wed Apr 14 19:38:08 EST 2004 i686
    GNU/Linux
    Date: 2004-07-13 and 2004-07-14
    Method: Booted off sarge iso-image downloaded from debian.org/devel/debian-installer, installed base from it, the rest from http://ftp.se.debian.org.

    Machine: VMWare
    Processor: 1.67 GHz
    Memory: 192 MB
    Root Device: SCSI (VMWare)
    Root Size/partition table: Automatic partitioning of 4GB drive
    Output of lspci:
    0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX -
    82443BX/ZX/DX Host bridge (rev 01)
    0000:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX AGP
    bridge (rev 01)
    0000:00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 08) 0000:00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01) 0000:00:07.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 08)
    0000:00:0f.0 VGA compatible controller: VMWare Inc [VMWare SVGA II] PCI
    Display Adapter
    0000:00:10.0 SCSI storage controller: BusLogic BT-946C (BA80C30)
    [MultiMaster 10] (rev 01)
    0000:00:11.0 Ethernet controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] 79c970
    [PCnet32 LANCE] (rev 10)

    Base System Installation Checklist:

    Initial boot worked: [0]
    Configure network HW: [0]
    Config network: [E]
    Detect CD: [0]
    Load installer modules: [0]
    Detect hard drives: [0]
    Partition hard drives: [E]
    Create file systems: [0]
    Mount partitions: [0]
    Install base system: [0]
    Install boot loader: [E]
    Reboot: [X]
    [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

    Comments/Problems:


    2004-07-13:
    First attempt, fast runthrough. Chose 'Go Back' on the choose location screen
    which led to it not being shown again. Overall impression: What just happened?

    2004-07-14:
    Second attempt.

    Press enter to boot

    Language is en_US

    Keyboard layout Swedish

    It's detecting hardware to find CD-ROM drives

    It's detecting network devices

    It won't let me set an IP-address because there is a DHCP-server on my subnet.
    Hm.

    Detecting disks and other hardware

    Starting up the partitioner
    Manually edit
    I choose the drive

    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)