From:
[email protected]
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 02:32:35PM +0300, Idan Sofer wrote:
Simon Huggins wrote:
Hmm, I can see your point but to be honest I would have thought that
most people would do a full upgrade and not pick and mix different
versions of the packages unless the knew what they were doing.
IM why did you for instance install xfce4 without having done a full >upgrade?
Full upgrade at sid is not always desireable, it's labeled "unstable"
for a reason after all, most of the time upgrades will be smooth, but I
tend to avoid situations where's apache is not working properly, just
because I wished to upgrade mozilla.
So I usually tend to upgrade packages only when i need or have
to(security, bugfixes or features).
That's fine but I think this classes you as a special case and given you
have to pick and choose which packages you upgrade anyway, I'm not sure
why I should add versioned dependencies to the meta-package.
Currently the meta-package's version doesn't reflect the version of
xfce4 in Debian in any case given it's at 4.0.5-1 whilst all of xfce4
4.0.6 is in sid.
I don't think your upgrade strategy is sustainable as you may get
yourself into all sorts of interesting situations. Actual dependencies
will be tracked properly (and if they are not feel free to file more
bugs) but I'm not convinced more work need to be done than that.
Feel free to try to persuade me otherwise but I don't think I'm going to
upload a new xfce4 before sarge unless there is very convincing
reasoning.
Simon.
--
UK based domain, email and web hosting ***/ "CATS. CATS ARE NICE." - /*
http://www.blackcatnetworks.co.uk/ **/ Death, "Sourcery" /**
[email protected] */ /*** Black Cat Networks / /****
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
[email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[email protected]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)