When I send an e-mail and MDA fails, mutt reports that the message was not delivered and there was an error. It allows me to fix whatever the problem was and resend.
However, if there are FCCs specified, they are still performed even in the case of a failed delivery.
If the primary delivery mechanism (MDA) fails, please cancel the FCC segment of the delivery.
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.6-20040803+1
Severity: normal
When I send an e-mail and MDA fails, mutt reports that the message was not delivered and there was an error. It allows me to fix whatever the problem was and resend.
However, if there are FCCs specified, they are still performed even in the case of a failed delivery.
If the primary delivery mechanism (MDA) fails, please cancel the FCC segment of the delivery.
hi, this was received at Debian's BTS. may I ask other list members to
briefly comment on it?
I've checked the behavior with "set sendmail=/bin/false".
* Scott Robinson [Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:48:04 -0700]:
When I send an e-mail and MDA fails, mutt reports that the message was not delivered and there was an error. It allows me to fix whatever the problem was and resend.
However, if there are FCCs specified, they are still performed even in the case of a failed delivery.
If the primary delivery mechanism (MDA) fails, please cancel the FCC segment
of the delivery.
the "FCC segment of the delivery" happens *before* passing the message
onto the MTA.
Scott, can you provide us a rationale for the suggested change? I mean,
I see no *strong* objections to the current behavior.
thanks,
If the primary delivery mechanism (MDA) fails, please cancel the FCC segment
of the delivery.
the "FCC segment of the delivery" happens *before* passing the message
onto the MTA.
Scott, can you provide us a rationale for the suggested change? I mean,
I see no *strong* objections to the current behavior.
hi, this was received at Debian's BTS. may I ask other list members to
briefly comment on it?
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 12:31:56AM +0200, Adeodato Sim� wrote:
[...]
I'll close this bug, unless you can come up with *very* good reasons
to change the *default* behavior. Other than that, a user-option has
been proposed by David Champion [4].
[5] http://does-not-exist.org/mail-archives/mutt-users/msg06050.html
[..]
My "good" reasons were brought up in the discussion. Thanks for giving it a thought.
If a new user-option ends up coming into existance, please let me know.
I'll close this bug, unless you can come up with *very* good reasons
to change the *default* behavior. Other than that, a user-option has
been proposed by David Champion [4].
[5] http://does-not-exist.org/mail-archives/mutt-users/msg06050.html
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 40:51:52 |
| Calls: | 12,109 |
| Files: | 15,006 |
| Messages: | 6,518,403 |