1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.BUGS.DIST

  • Bug#266543: should have Replaces: rosegarden (<< 2.4pl4)

    From Enrique Robledo Arnuncio@1:229/2 to Wouter Verhelst on Sun Aug 22 00:00:15 2004
    From: [email protected]

    On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 10:10:06PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
    On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 07:56:08AM -0400, Enrique Robledo Arnuncio wrote:
    Well, I don't feel very confortable about it either... the only
    explanation I can think of is that maybe you did have a rosegarden_2.1pl4xxxx package installed, taken from somewhere
    else.

    Right, _that_ could be it. I think I once might have prepared such a
    package, with the intend to offer an NMU, or send it in as a patch, or
    so. If I had indeed installed it at that time, then that would explain
    why it would break.

    Obviously.

    Since I can no longer reproduce the problem myself either, I assume this
    was what was happening. Sorry for the noise ;-)

    2.1pl4 has been arround for a long time now...

    Yeah, I know. Have a look at who submitted the "new upstream" wishlist
    bug ;-)

    Ok, so I guess that puts some of the blame for this confusion on me :)

    So lets hope that it was all caused by that local package. I'll go
    ahead and close this bug.

    Enrique.



    --
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
  • From Wouter Verhelst@1:229/2 to All on Wed Aug 18 11:20:08 2004
    From: [email protected]

    Package: rosegarden2
    Version: 2.1pl4-2
    Severity: important

    Not doing this makes dpkg bail out because rosegarden2 tries to
    overwrite /usr/bin/rosegarden (which used to be in the "rosegarden"
    package, and is still installed in that version at the time of the
    installation of rosegarden2, thanks to the dependency). This breaks
    upgrades.

    -- System Information:
    Debian Release: 3.1
    APT prefers unstable
    APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
    Architecture: i386 (i686)
    Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1
    Locale: LANG=nl_BE.ISO-8859-15@euro, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.ISO-8859-15@euro

    Versions of packages rosegarden2 depends on:
    ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library
    ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Session Management ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxmu6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous util ii libxpm4 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X pixmap library
    ii libxt6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Toolkit Intrinsics
    ii xaw3dg 1.5+E-7 Xaw3d widget set
    ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System client libraries m

    -- no debconf information


    --
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
  • From Enrique Robledo Arnuncio@1:229/2 to Wouter Verhelst on Wed Aug 18 17:30:11 2004
    From: [email protected]

    I understand you meant:

    " should have Replaces: rosegarden (<< 2.1pl4) "
    ^
    But it does have it! The control file of rosegarden2 2.1pl4-2 includes
    the following lines:

    Replaces: rosegarden (<< 2.1pl4)
    Provides: rosegarden
    Conflicts: rosegarden (<< 2.1pl4)

    Could you try to reproduce the problem, and send me the complete error messages? I made quite a few tests upgrading in all possible ways from
    the old rosegarden to the new rosegarden2, or to both
    rosegarden/rosegarden2, and it all seems to always work fine.

    Am I missing something?

    Enrique.

    On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 10:48:03AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
    Package: rosegarden2
    Version: 2.1pl4-2
    Severity: important

    Not doing this makes dpkg bail out because rosegarden2 tries to
    overwrite /usr/bin/rosegarden (which used to be in the "rosegarden"
    package, and is still installed in that version at the time of the installation of rosegarden2, thanks to the dependency). This breaks
    upgrades.

    -- System Information:
    Debian Release: 3.1
    APT prefers unstable
    APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
    Architecture: i386 (i686)
    Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1
    Locale: LANG=nl_BE.ISO-8859-15@euro, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.ISO-8859-15@euro

    Versions of packages rosegarden2 depends on:
    ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
    ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library
    ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Session Management
    ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li
    ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous exte
    ii libxmu6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous util
    ii libxpm4 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X pixmap library
    ii libxt6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Toolkit Intrinsics
    ii xaw3dg 1.5+E-7 Xaw3d widget set
    ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System client libraries m

    -- no debconf information


    --
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)