1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.BUGS.RC

  • Bug#1109249: raysession: Missing dependency: python3-legacy-cgi

    From orl@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 14 09:40:01 2025
    Package: raysession
    Version: 0.14.4-2
    Severity: serious
    Justification: 7
    X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]

    Dear Maintainer,

    Raysession package is missing one dependency upon python3-legacy-cgi. It is unusable unless you install that dependency.

    -- System Information:
    Debian Release: trixie/sid
    APT prefers testing-security
    APT policy: (500, 'testing-security'), (500, 'testing')
    Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
    Foreign Architectures: i386

    Kernel: Linux 6.12.9-rt-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
    Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
    Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
    Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
    Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
    LSM: AppArmor: enabled

    Versions of packages raysession depends on:
    ii fonts-roboto 2:0~20170802-4
    ii python3 3.13.2-2
    ii python3-liblo 0.16.3-1+b1
    ii python3-pyqt5 5.15.11+dfsg-2
    ii python3-pyqt5.qtsvg 5.15.11+dfsg-2
    ii python3-xdg 0.28-2

    Versions of packages raysession recommends:
    ii wmctrl 1.07+git20240228.1105759-1

    raysession suggests no packages.

    -- no debconf information

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 27 19:30:01 2025
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Sun, 27 Jul 2025 17:19:46 +0000
    with message-id <[email protected]>
    and subject line Bug#1109249: fixed in raysession 0.14.4-3
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1109249,
    regarding raysession: Missing dependency: python3-legacy-cgi
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
    immediately.)


    --
    1109249: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1109249
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact [email protected] with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2025 07:35:10 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
    BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,FOURLA,HAS_PACKAGE,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,
    SPF_SOFTFAIL,WORD_WITHOUT_VOWELS,XMAILER_REPORTBUG autolearn=ham
    autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 55; hammy, 150; neutral, 35; spammy,
    0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--XDebbugsCc,
    0.000-+--X-Debbugs-Cc, 0.000-+--python3, 0.000-+--trixie,
    0.000-+--sk:taint_o
    Return-path: <[email protected]>
    Received: from [2a01:e0a:2b3:4180:114f:9a8d:480f:a36f] (port=34954 helo=DatZeProducer.lilakap.nohost.me)
    by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96)
    (envelope-from <[email protected]