• Bug#1104189: ruby-mina: Should ruby-mina be removed from unstable?

    From Andreas Tille@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 27 07:40:01 2025
    Source: ruby-mina
    Version: 0.3.7-1.1
    Severity: serious
    Justification: grab attention of maintainer
    X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers <[email protected]>, Aggelos Avgerinos <[email protected]>, Package Salvaging Team <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected].
    org

    Dear maintainer,

    I suggest removing ruby-mina from Debian for the following reasons:

    * The last maintainer upload was 2015-12-24 for version 0.3.7. Upstream
    has meanwhile 1.2.5.
    * There are no votes in popcon
    https://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=ruby-mina&show_installed=on&show_vote=on&want_legend=on&want_ticks=on&from_date=&to_date=&hlght_date=&date_fmt=%25Y-%25m&beenhere=1
    * The binary package mina has no reverse depends

    This bug serves as a pre-removal warning. After one month, the bug will be reassigned to ftp.debian.org to actually request removal of the package.

    In case the package should be kept inside Debian, please let me know.
    I'd happily help to fix the two open very easy to fix bugs and possibly
    upgrade to the latest upstream version. You can do so by easily closing
    this bug (to be sure keep me in CC if you want me to help with this
    package).

    In case the package should be removed from unstable, you may reassign this
    bug report:

    Control: severity -1 normal
    Control: retitle -1 RM: ruby-mina -- RoM; rc-buggy
    Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
    Control: affects -1 + src:ruby-mina

    Alternatively, you may wait a month and have it reassigned.


    Your package was highlighted in the Bug of the Day[1] initiative, which
    aims to introduce newcomers to manageable tasks and guide them through
    the workflow to solve them. The focus of this initiative is on migrating packages to Salsa, as it's a great way to familiarize newcomers with a consistent Git-based workflow.


    Kind regards
    Andreas.

    [1] https://salsa.debian.org/qa/tiny_qa_tools/-/wikis/Tiny-QA-tasks



    -- System Information:
    Debian Release: trixie/sid
    APT prefers unstable
    APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (50, 'buildd-unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
    Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

    Kernel: Linux 6.3.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
    Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
    Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
    Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
    LSM: AppArmor: enabled

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 3 09:40:01 2025
    Processing control commands:

    severity -1 normal
    Bug #1104189 [src:ruby-mina] ruby-mina: Should ruby-mina be removed from unstable?
    Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
    retitle -1 RM: ruby-mina -- RoM; rc-buggy
    Bug #1104189 [src:ruby-mina] ruby-mina: Should ruby-mina be removed from unstable?
    Changed Bug title to 'RM: ruby-mina -- RoM; rc-buggy' from 'ruby-mina: Should ruby-mina be removed from unstable?'.
    reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
    Bug #1104189 [src:ruby-mina] RM: ruby-mina -- RoM; rc-buggy
    Bug reassigned from package 'src:ruby-mina' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
    No longer marked as found in versions ruby-mina/0.3.7-1.1.
    Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1104189 to the same values previously set
    affects -1 + src:ruby-mina
    Bug #1104189 [ftp.debian.org] RM: ruby-mina -- RoM; rc-buggy
    Added indication that 1104189 affects src:ruby-mina

    --
    1104189: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1104189
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact [email protected] with problems

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)