• Bug#1099130: Are the Firefox Terms of Use suitable for Debian?

    From Mike Hommey@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 16 01:10:01 2025
    Control: reassign -1 firefox

    On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 05:37:24PM -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
    Control: retitle -1 Are the Firefox Terms of Use suitable for Debian?

    As described in Mozilla’s communication, due to changes in laws in various places where Mozilla operates (particularly California and the
    EU), having a clear Terms of Use in the product became a necessity (all other major browsers also have terms, open source or not).

    Sylvestre, your final parenthetical claim here appears to not be true
    for the only other major web browser in Debian and therefore an easy alternative for Debian to switch to now: chromium.

    Sylvestre, would Mozilla strongly object if Debian patched Firefox to
    remove links to the Terms of Use and links to the Privacy Notice?

    It looks to me like we have a situation where the maintainer of
    firefox-esr is a Mozilla employee and may be unwilling to take any
    action on this issue. Meanwhile, this is an RC bug and firefox-esr is eligible for automatic removal from Debian Testing which is causing a
    burden on other Debian maintainers and bug fixers since other things
    are marked for automatic removal because they depend on firefox-esr. I
    think we'll need the Debian Release Team to weigh in on this issue
    soon.

    Actually, we don't, because ESR 128 doesn't have the code that shows the
    Terms of Use.

    Mike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joey Hess@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 16 03:10:01 2025
    Jeremy B�cha wrote:
    https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/privacy/firefox/ which does include the
    new Terms of Use.

    I don't see a link on that page to the new ToU. (It does link to some
    ToU's of chatbots.)

    It is also linked to in Help > About Firefox.

    Indeed it is! While this is a ways from "making it a part of the
    standard product experience" that was promised for early March and still
    does not seem to have happened, it seems to me that by making those
    clicks, I've made a legally binding agreement with Mozilla to grant them
    a license to all content I enter into firefox.

    --
    see shy jo

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEKKUAw1IH6rcvbA8l2xLbD/BfjzgFAmf+/+8ACgkQ2xLbD/Bf jzjjVQ/8COsKgY79sXn0GwTK1LkTOKn2r2uD1wyLlxC0RVe79KvKcyTUeidQHYov MHc4z1zfVYJ5e8m+7JO0wH60quLfASnmNWyk91/bhF0qOFxaEMcc0eWne+emW35H PRxQiwUadijHm1cImSfQ3UfkKysZQVDKiCQje6MxJm5j96Ubd0Z02Qk8t1U2QGsh EVTIzE0m4q4Em1ADlNGYh5Cr05NIom7DhLJuUaF8Kv3ygg3+Nc98Gu+W4z5/2DMq ZkYfALZj5Skn9xRhj3+4WV1CsB/uAHoWFTOiYjf5A5JZhAPkt8O3uulUBbL13l3n lpqtRkkU70/VgiiDDSQMqW8VArMsnmBRQKHZxciP+hdIIZUSsl2AJekAqjg3cakx b6KXjdgeWS2hLakPi6GQoeAE9vvbZ/OoGUWjAvRWHZR1T86QRAkTOzru/XEDoC/p 5qh0PP0qj6g2nXGm5UHi/9N16aVfITyxoV7OpvJ/w9dQEGmUw8G1zXBGrPlTUYh+ iQY/AdWBNIrPB658ln+aPNbjDRsSdwcHPLWbhA9o241LUJuoKnBHwNnGIGI4AlLD GJMQXqO2K7wFu+wjzCigXq7o7uxkHALsIHw6eL428mNhi8fMIYbybgSd5ZaMF6lk VOVs42avUeBpkmq3wYX544A7kcvtSKgQOhK1SX8fWFt0GIdt9UU=
    =meHT
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)