• Bug#1103226: chromium: FTBFS: gen/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/c

    From Santiago Vila@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 15 03:30:01 2025
    Package: src:chromium
    Version: 135.0.7049.84-1
    Severity: serious
    Tags: ftbfs trixie sid

    Dear maintainer:

    During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [...]
    [23872/53626] CXX obj/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/platform/character_property_data.o
    [23873/53626] CXX obj/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/platform/color_data.o FAILED: obj/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/platform/color_data.o clang++-19 -MD -MF obj/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/p [too-long-redacted] /platform/platform/color_data.o
    gen/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/color_data.cc:138:7: error: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label
    138 | [[fallthrough]];
    | ^
    gen/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/color_data.cc:162:7: error: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label
    162 | [[fallthrough]];
    | ^
    gen/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/color_data.cc:186:7: error: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label
    186 | [[fallthrough]];
    | ^
    gen/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/color_data.cc:226:7: error: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label
    226 | [[fallthrough]];
    | ^
    gen/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/color_data.cc:178:7: error: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label
    178 | [[fallthrough]];
    | ^
    gen/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/color_data.cc:202:7: error: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label
    202 | [[fallthrough]];
    | ^
    gen/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/color_data.cc:154:7: error: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label
    154 | [[fallthrough]];
    | ^
    gen/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/color_data.cc:114:7: error: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label
    114 | [[fallthrough]];
    | ^
    gen/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/color_data.cc:242:7: error: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label
    242 | [[fallthrough]];
    | ^
    gen/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/color_data.cc:218:7: error: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label
    218 | [[fallthrough]];
    | ^
    gen/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/color_data.cc:170:7: error: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label
    170 | [[fallthrough]];
    | ^
    gen/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/color_data.cc:106:7: error: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label
    106 | [[fallthrough]];
    | ^
    gen/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/color_data.cc:194:7: error: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label
    194 | [[fallthrough]];
    | ^
    gen/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/color_data.cc:130:7: error: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label
    130 | [[fallthrough]];
    | ^
    gen/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/color_data.cc:98:7: error: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label
    98 | [[fallthrough]];
    | ^
    gen/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/color_data.cc:122:7: error: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label
    122 | [[fallthrough]];
    | ^
    gen/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/color_data.cc:210:7: error: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label
    210 | [[fallthrough]];
    | ^
    gen/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/color_data.cc:234:7: error: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label
    234 | [[fallthrough]];
    | ^
    gen/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/color_data.cc:146:7: error: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label
    146 | [[fallthrough]];
    | ^
    19 errors generated.
    [23874/53626] CXX obj/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/platform/widget_base.o
    ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
    make[1]: *** [debian/rules:172: override_dh_auto_build-arch] Error 1
    make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
    make: *** [debian/rules:138: binary] Error 2
    dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess returned exit status 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The above is just how the build ends and not necessarily the most relevant part.
    If required, the full build log is available here:

    https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/202504/

    About the archive rebuild: The build was made on virtual machines from AWS, using sbuild and a reduced chroot with only build-essential packages.

    If you could not reproduce the bug please contact me privately, as I
    am willing to provide ssh access to a virtual machine where the bug is
    fully reproducible.

    If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use
    reassign and add an affects on src:chromium, so that this is still
    visible in the BTS web page for this package.

    Thanks.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 16 08:40:01 2025
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Wed, 16 Apr 2025 06:36:23 +0000
    with message-id <[email protected]>
    and subject line Bug#1103226: fixed in chromium 135.0.7049.95-1
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1103226,
    regarding chromium: FTBFS: gen/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/color_data.cc:138:7: error: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
    immediately.)


    --
    1103226: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103226
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact [email protected] with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Apr 2025 01:22:24 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-120.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
    BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
    DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE,
    RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,
    USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
    version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 20; hammy, 150; neutral, 94; spammy,
    0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--trixie, 0.000-+--pkgbuilddir,
    0.000-+--PKGBUILDDIR, 0.000-+--H*F:U*sanvila, 0.000-+--H*rp:U*sanvila Return-path: <[email protected]>
    Received: from mitropoulos.debian.org ([2001:648:2ffc:deb:216
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 19 00:40:02 2025
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Fri, 18 Apr 2025 22:32:08 +0000
    with message-id <[email protected]>
    and subject line Bug#1103226: fixed in chromium 135.0.7049.95-1~deb12u1
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1103226,
    regarding chromium: FTBFS: gen/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/color_data.cc:138:7: error: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
    immediately.)


    --
    1103226: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103226
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact [email protected] with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Apr 2025 01:22:24 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-120.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
    BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
    DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE,
    RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,
    USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
    version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 20; hammy, 150; neutral, 94; spammy,
    0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--trixie, 0.000-+--pkgbuilddir,
    0.000-+--PKGBUILDDIR, 0.000-+--H*F:U*sanvila, 0.000-+--H*rp:U*sanvila Return-path: <[email protected]>
    Received: from mitropoulos.debian.org ([2001:648:2ffc:deb:216