• Processed: Re: Bug#1091561: btrfs-compsize: FTBFS on i386: radix-tree.h

    From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 17 00:00:01 2025
    Processing control commands:

    tag -1 patch
    Bug #1091561 [src:btrfs-compsize] btrfs-compsize: FTBFS on i386: radix-tree.h:51:9: error: unknown type name ‘gfp_t’
    Added tag(s) patch.
    retitle -1 Bug#1091561: btrfs-compsize: FTBFS: radix-tree.h:51:9: error: unknown type name ‘gfp_t’
    Bug #1091561 [src:btrfs-compsize] btrfs-compsize: FTBFS on i386: radix-tree.h:51:9: error: unknown type name ‘gfp_t’
    Changed Bug title to 'Bug#1091561: btrfs-compsize: FTBFS: radix-tree.h:51:9: error: unknown type name ‘gfp_t’' from 'btrfs-compsize: FTBFS on i386: radix-tree.h:51:9: error: unknown type name ‘gfp_t’'.

    --
    1091561: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091561
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact [email protected] with problems

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 17 00:10:01 2025
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Fri, 16 May 2025 22:04:15 +0000
    with message-id <[email protected]>
    and subject line Bug#1091561: fixed in btrfs-compsize 1.5-1.1
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1091561,
    regarding Bug#1091561: btrfs-compsize: FTBFS: radix-tree.h:51:9: error: unknown type name ‘gfp_t’
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
    immediately.)


    --
    1091561: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091561
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact [email protected] with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2024 16:38:21 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
    DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,
    SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,
    USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST,WORD_WITHOUT_VOWELS autolearn=ham
    autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 65; hammy, 150; neutral, 219; spammy,
    0. spammytokens:
    hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
    0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
    0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
    Return-path: <[email protected]>
    Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:20