1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.DEVEL.RELEAS

  • Bug#1099081: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, gworkspace

    From Yavor Doganov@21:1/5 to All on Fri Feb 28 00:40:01 2025
    XPost: linux.debian.bugs.dist

    Package: release.debian.org
    Severity: normal
    X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
    User: [email protected]
    Usertags: transition
    Control: affects -1 + src:gnustep-base src:gnustep-gui src:gworkspace

    We at the GNUstep team would like to request a transition slot for a simultaneous (combined) transition of three libraries:

    libgnustep-base1.30 -> 1.31
    libgnustep-gui0.31 -> 0.32
    libinspector0 -> 1

    The only reverse-dependency that FTBFS is gnustep-dl2 (#1096111) but
    the fixed package is already in testing. As always during GNUstep
    library transitions, gnustep-back will require a sourceful upload.

    The ben file for gnustep-base will need a little correction to take
    into account universal-detector:

    is_affected = .depends ~ /\b(libgnustep\-base1\.31|libgnustep\-base1\.30)\b/ | .source ~ /universal-detector/;
    is_good = .depends ~ /\b(libgnustep\-base1\.31|gnustep\-base\-abi\-1\.31)\b/; is_bad = .depends ~ /\b(libgnustep\-base1\.30|gnustep\-base\-abi\-1\.30)\b/;

    Both bookworm and bullseye shipped with outdated GNUstep core
    libraries so we would very much like to avoid that in trixie.
    Thanks for considering.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Fri Feb 28 10:10:01 2025
    Processing control commands:

    tags -1 confirmed
    Bug #1099081 [release.debian.org] transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, gworkspace
    Added tag(s) confirmed.

    --
    1099081: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1099081
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact [email protected] with problems

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Yavor Doganov@21:1/5 to Emilio Pozuelo Monfort on Fri Feb 28 19:20:01 2025
    XPost: linux.debian.bugs.dist

    On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 10:05:32AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
    On 28/02/2025 00:37, Yavor Doganov wrote:
    The ben file for gnustep-base will need a little correction to take
    into account universal-detector:

    is_affected = .depends ~ /\b(libgnustep\-base1\.31|libgnustep\-base1\.30)\b/ | .source ~ /universal-detector/;
    is_good = .depends ~ /\b(libgnustep\-base1\.31|gnustep\-base\-abi\-1\.31)\b/;
    is_bad = .depends ~ /\b(libgnustep\-base1\.30|gnustep\-base\-abi\-1\.30)\b/;

    Adding it like that won't help, it will just show up as unknown as it
    doesn't depend on either of those packages.

    I don't think that's the case:

    $ apt-cache show libuniversaldetector-dev | grep ^Depends
    Depends: gnustep-base-abi-1.30

    Since it's just one package, we can trigger a rebuild for it and
    keep an eye on it.

    OK, the important thing is not to forget to schedule binNMUs for
    universal detector as well (the dependency guarantees that it will be
    rebuilt before unar). You are probably right that it's not worth the
    trouble to amend the ben file.

    Go ahead.

    Thanks very much; all uploaded.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to Yavor Doganov on Wed Mar 19 07:40:02 2025
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Wed, 19 Mar 2025 07:36:40 +0100
    with message-id <[email protected]>
    and subject line Re: Bug#1099081: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, gworkspace
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1099081,
    regarding transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, gworkspace
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
    immediately.)


    --
    1099081: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1099081
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact [email protected] with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Feb 2025 23:38:10 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-27.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
    BODY_INCLUDES_CONTROL_AFFECTS,BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,HAS_PACKAGE,
    RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_SOFTFAIL,XMAILER_REPORTBUG autolearn=ham
    autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 14; hammy, 141; neutral, 32; spammy,
    0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--XDebbugsCc,
    0.000-+--X-Debbugs-Cc, 0.000-+--bookworm, 0.000-+--trixie,
    0.000-+--H*M:reportbug
    Return-path: <[email protected]>
    Received: from [213.16.57.111] (port=51488 helo=yavor.doganov.org)
    by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
    (Exi