1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.DEVEL.RELEAS

  • State of riscv64

    From Cyril Brulebois@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 26 23:00:01 2024
    Hi,

    I'd like to get a sense of whether the following situation on riscv64 is
    just pure bad luck or if that's something that we should expect to run
    into in a regular fashion:

    1: gcc-14 (11d 11h 30m, rv-manda-02), graph-tool (4d 19h 33m, rv-osuosl-03), gcc-snapshot (4d 15h 1m, rv-osuosl-04), kicad (11h 8m, rv-manda-01), mpich (7h 14m, rv-manda-04), pyside6 (5h 26m, rv-manda-03), freecad (5h 9m, rv-osuosl-05), jpeg-xl (4h
    19m, rv-osuosl-02)

    A number of those packages take several-to-many days to build. The other
    ones “only” take many hours instead.

    I wouldn't usually worry about this too much, but it seems riscv64
    became a full release architecture in the meanwhile (even if I don't
    recall seeing any announcement), and missing builds block migration…

    https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/britney2/-/commit/593e01d703966ba8602eeff7594b0553900ea84f


    Cheers,
    --
    Cyril Brulebois ([email protected]) <https://debamax.com/>
    D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEtg6/KYRFPHDXTPR4/5FK8MKzVSAFAmdt0CIACgkQ/5FK8MKz VSDrthAAuuCPmkE8i7IB/Prz77yxSgTOfNMkqXqp2PeDWwcKGqa6AN43cjwhSlak TQbY1UNZeEiXfE2MnHUx6cm8axtG5Coe/Bcd1Qq46zPrdyGSvJBXYUZSCtmkjBHL kP8Cy4Cn6kQEB0tMVhyS0StfEGaUpin1IFRay/ZjPwvZBoaBcL3tJ03Zt2+NnMBw JFQ9A5ZhzfLPaRSqXoyUAG5A8bDVcGLAC4oOqiY5J5HVZZJ6j0w8z91vCKCVhpPI O26GjoLXoNM91anvxVqifzoXUK35Pir3/Q+w4K5ApPyQrKA/ynf1Fr0JTjYtuUl+ KKcrWAw3QrdTmKI96gwvygn5E3XSu/LP4O3J32DszpgA0lw6d30FgaXzBAqN+l0j iwsNRG2ykY+LapKEWqqGbri4SXOsrpOhl80AomajY6vJbSyKa80eJFfuptjhcOMv JT2viMqv4yjEKijm9aDTeC4Az4C/RpMzg3FW9BXS8diriPAvLGAM62Ad9tTnb6I9 jczfgCrPfK7QJwOcXpeNYFNspna2rZEZipPGr1YIJQ2Y3xfZ0PbrxMS6Vg+HHzPH 1dUdz988FVweR6r4Zr81YC4w0Wqj6HXrqZxriDrsTt1NIUM9PTnwPFI9VmQK2XvG Pub5HW2whIwFtReirJXA14fExR2/AJ3C5aAny5Ry1ylsBqoARtQ=
    =+sqx
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    *
  • From Sebastian Ramacher@21:1/5 to Cyril Brulebois on Tue Dec 31 13:20:01 2024
    Hi

    On 2024-12-26 22:52:37 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
    I'd like to get a sense of whether the following situation on riscv64 is
    just pure bad luck or if that's something that we should expect to run
    into in a regular fashion:

    1: gcc-14 (11d 11h 30m, rv-manda-02), graph-tool (4d 19h 33m, rv-osuosl-03), gcc-snapshot (4d 15h 1m, rv-osuosl-04), kicad (11h 8m, rv-manda-01), mpich (7h 14m, rv-manda-04), pyside6 (5h 26m, rv-manda-03), freecad (5h 9m, rv-osuosl-05), jpeg-xl (4h
    19m, rv-osuosl-02)

    To some extent this is bad luck with uploads of packages that take a
    long time to build. From my experience with the last couple of
    transitions, riscv64 was reasonable fast to work though the rebuilds.

    Also https://buildd.debian.org/stats/riscv64.png suggests that the
    backlog is usually not too bad. Note that the current peak of packages
    in Needs-Build is due to low priority rebuilds of hundreds of packages
    with outdated Built-Using.

    Cheers
    --
    Sebastian Ramacher

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cyril Brulebois@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 3 18:10:01 2025
    Sebastian Ramacher <[email protected]> (2024-12-31):
    On 2024-12-26 22:52:37 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
    I'd like to get a sense of whether the following situation on riscv64 is just pure bad luck or if that's something that we should expect to run
    into in a regular fashion:

    1: gcc-14 (11d 11h 30m, rv-manda-02), graph-tool (4d 19h 33m, rv-osuosl-03), gcc-snapshot (4d 15h 1m, rv-osuosl-04), kicad (11h 8m, rv-manda-01), mpich (7h 14m, rv-manda-04), pyside6 (5h 26m, rv-manda-03), freecad (5h 9m, rv-osuosl-05), jpeg-xl (
    4h 19m, rv-osuosl-02)

    To some extent this is bad luck with uploads of packages that take a
    long time to build. From my experience with the last couple of
    transitions, riscv64 was reasonable fast to work though the rebuilds.

    Also https://buildd.debian.org/stats/riscv64.png suggests that the
    backlog is usually not too bad. Note that the current peak of packages
    in Needs-Build is due to low priority rebuilds of hundreds of packages
    with outdated Built-Using.

    Copy all, thank you.


    Cheers,
    --
    Cyril Brulebois ([email protected]) <https://debamax.com/>
    D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEtg6/KYRFPHDXTPR4/5FK8MKzVSAFAmd4GZcACgkQ/5FK8MKz VSAonw//dvftYB/pCPETvpAUdDvU5vXyMk/7nnu1PoZkdZxqfeFksDlkbCFCK8XB sObStth5CB6spB+M2Y7/Yv1EmKqzY2TPOEoLrp/MRIuURMKQEurzAyEi9BAhAkw6 UCaG9TbvhMhXUzroLebYfJLJE5MYJtHqjTtum8JGvY/0vnrL2BYyw2awLpSgqDuX JO7G+rPZjH1ZAxFezIGdQXRg57AkkjoirMJBq/WKMhrkOU0TXnWqjxXHmonZM7py lSjBHSQ5SulWd30mxn/afnHu2n76EfntoL2rQoCJpVraWBDe77XON13XobNXXVJi mcJgKfVbMFowqjayCW7z7WqgZLYfhTQstMUhidUtpZl1xAHD3wMa4S7j0s4TJ06s AHC+3J5mqBMaQ6y+l5KhN0jxHbRZvlDUdtAt8X2OETTD2OjmfCFWw14m1lr5ZSVu lhFfAnx3uy5I78GQlUB8JXO/ANS9DnCpmNubuXuQfWSUQ13uYOTaxMmkQBeG7coH vG/RyQX6upxx4a8XPSUiRGRBUQ8G2b1kn2WIdjYSIL90pAgHDhLmuPfGt6qrvi1V m+9swbd/mC1BPLBT9xpeCXx7Rx53Ol7mfTbG8eQTmHwIlqwPjNtyt4H9cciCC18r XMPdNe2Hz9Vzly2dyYoPafTBgdxJmxR0D+QDgGTS8mbKCfIUGLc=
    =DYrV
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    *