Hi Markus

On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 02:46, Markus Blatt <[email protected]> wrote:

Nevertheless opm-grid, opm-material, opm-models, opm-simulators, and opm-upscaling will
need to be rebuild for the mini-transition. Otherwise they won't work correctly

If it is possible to give me upload rights for the DUNE packages, then I could do the
upload/transition work myself, too. But I would still require some guidance (next steps, etc.)
and don't want to step on other people's toes.

I found out about this transition after an Ubuntu developer asked me
to schedule binNMUs for some opm-* packages. In future, you can
follow steps described [1] and file a transition bug against release.debian.org. For now, I have scheduled binNMUs for opm-grid, opm-material, opm-models, opm-simulators, and opm-upscaling.

I've also set up a transition tracker [2], with the following ben file:

title = "dune-common-2.9.0";
is_affected = .depends ~ /libdune-common-2/;
is_good = .depends ~ /libdune-common-2\.9/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /libdune-common-2\.8/;
notes = "https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2023/01/msg00001.html";
export = false;

Please let us know if anything else is needed.

Regards
Graham


[1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions
[2] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/dune-common-2.9.0.html

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Dear Graham,

Am Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 04:25:04PM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs:

Hi Markus

On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 02:46, Markus Blatt <[email protected]> wrote:

Nevertheless opm-grid, opm-material, opm-models, opm-simulators, and opm-upscaling will
need to be rebuild for the mini-transition. Otherwise they won't work correctly

I found out about this transition after an Ubuntu developer asked me
to schedule binNMUs for some opm-* packages. In future, you can
follow steps described [1] and file a transition bug against >release.debian.org. For now, I have scheduled binNMUs for opm-grid, >opm-material, opm-models, opm-simulators, and opm-upscaling.

I've also set up a transition tracker [2], with the following ben file:

[2] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/dune-common-2.9.0.html

Thanks a lot Graham. That really worked like a charm and seem to finished. Cool.These processes
and the tools in Debian are really great.

Next time I will try to do that myself to avoid confusion.
Is the upload to NEW for dune-common optional as the package name stays the same?

Cheers,

Markus
--

Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichst�tt, Germany, USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hi Markus

On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 at 09:59, Markus Blatt <[email protected]> wrote:

Thanks a lot Graham. That really worked like a charm and seem to finished. Cool.These processes
and the tools in Debian are really great.

Almost there, the excuses [1] for dune-common shows:

Migration status: Blocked. Can't migrate due to a non-migratable
dependency. Check status below.
Blocked by: opm-simulators/ppc64el

I don't think any action is required, just some waiting.

Next time I will try to do that myself to avoid confusion.
Is the upload to NEW for dune-common optional as the package name stays the same?

That's correct.

By the way, excuses [2] for opm-common shows:

Issues preventing migration:
missing build on armhf

Regards
Graham


[1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dune-common
[2] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/opm-common

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hi Markus

On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 at 20:48, Graham Inggs <[email protected]> wrote:

Almost there, the excuses [1] for dune-common shows:

Migration status: Blocked. Can't migrate due to a non-migratable
dependency. Check status below.
Blocked by: opm-simulators/ppc64el

I don't think any action is required, just some waiting.

My apologies, I knew the ppc64el buildd infrastructure was a bit
behind, so didn't look at this closely. Upon further investigation, I
found that the dune-common transition is entangled with the Python
3.11 transition through opm-simulators. We will either wait for
Python 3.11, or find a way to disentangle them.

By the way, excuses [2] for opm-common shows:

Issues preventing migration:
missing build on armhf

I noticed there was an upload of opm-common 2022.10+ds-3, but it also
FTBFS on armhf. I trust this is on your radar.

Regards
Graham

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hi Markus

On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 at 19:59, Graham Inggs <[email protected]> wrote:

I noticed there was an upload of opm-common 2022.10+ds-3, but it also
FTBFS on armhf. I trust this is on your radar.

It turns opm-common was blocked by python3-defaults and
python3-defaults was blocked by opm-common's FTBFS on armhf.

To break out of the Catch-22, I temporarily removed opm-* from testing
and dune-* migrated together.
opm-* will be able to migrate once the armhf build is fixed, or
opm-common stops building for that architecture.

Regards
Graham

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)