Hi,
Am 20.06.23 um 16:52 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 05:52:44AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
Am 19.06.23 um 23:29 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
The pragmatic option would be to run only a smoketest for build success >>>> on architectures not tested by upstream.
And have Format->Character in Impress crash with Bus error like on
mipsel? That doesn't sound too good for basic quality.
There is a "smoketest" but it does just basic start. open, close stuff.
Not even basic usage.
That said, that is the smoketest on mipsel:
The problem with a mail like this is that it really doesn't help anybody
in understanding the problem. As porter, it will probably take a lot of
time to get to the point where you can start looking at what the problem might be. It contains lots of information, but it's not clear what the problem is and what needs to be looked at.
Except by just starting to build and run into an issue....
(process:8700): dconf-CRITICAL **: 02:36:13.575: unable to create directory >> '/run/user/2952/dconf': Permission denied. dconf will not work properly.
(process:8708): dconf-CRITICAL **: 02:36:19.328: unable to create directory >> '/run/user/2952/dconf': Permission denied. dconf will not work properly.
(process:8815): dconf-CRITICAL **: 02:36:52.467: unable to create directory >> '/run/user/2952/dconf': Permission denied. dconf will not work properly.
Is this something the porter should look at? Is is relevant?
No. That also happens everywhere, also on amd64/arm64.
Fatal exception: Signal 11
It's a segfault,
I know :)
this should normally be trivial for you to debug,
but is probably complicated for a porter to find out how to do things
like attaching a debugger to the relevant process.
Well, the command line is there, but I see the point.
Still one could talk about this... I yet have to hear from any porter
talking about actual issues (and the buildlogs *are* there).
Stack:
/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/instdir/program/libuno_sal.so.3(+0x49b18)[0x77d69b18]
/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/instdir/program/libuno_sal.so.3(+0x49d48)[0x77d69d48]
/usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-mipsel/lib/server/libjvm.so(+0x537b8c)[0x62417b8c]
Is this some openjdk problem, not a problem in libreoffice problem?
In this specific case probably openjdk. I was juat answering Adrian on
the smoketest.
Actually I run a --disable-java build on eller right now.
./smoketest/smoketest.cxx:187:(anonymous namespace)::Test::test
assertion failed
- Expression: connection_.isStillAlive()
So the (TCP?) connection is not alive? Why not? That doesn't seem to be platform specific. Is that a problem in the test suite, and not
libreoffice itself?
Because libreoffice crashed, "obviously", so there of course is no
connection anymore.
The point here is that it even crashes at startup so probably being
completely broken. (and I am not surprised)
unknown:0:(anonymous namespace)::Test::test
tearDown() failed
- An uncaught exception of type com.sun.star.lang.DisposedException
- Binary URP bridge already disposed at ./binaryurp/source/bridge.cxx:1048 >>
(anonymous namespace)::Test::test finished in: 76764ms
smoketest.cxx:187:Assertion
Test name: (anonymous namespace)::Test::test
assertion failed
- Expression: connection_.isStillAlive()
##Failure Location unknown## : Error
Test name: (anonymous namespace)::Test::test
tearDown() failed
- An uncaught exception of type com.sun.star.lang.DisposedException
And then the test suite crashes because it can't actually deal
with the previous the assertion failure, and the segfault above
is not relevant at all?
It crashes because libreoffice crashed, the connection is not there and therefore not alive. Yes, I can read that.
As said, I was just pointing at a smoketest example.
The most likely thing is that this is not a platform specific issue,
but a either a general issue that just shows up on some platforms for whatever reason, or some problem in an other piece of software that libreoffice is using that does have a pratform specific issue.
This specific one might be, yes.
That's probably not true for the other architectures' failures. (E.g.
the Bus error I mentioned earlier or the powerpcs having
"Trace/breakpoint trap (core dumped)" or s390x or armel crashing in
loading tiff files.
And that is all only the first failure on earch archs, there's more,
there's gazillions of failures in the architectures' build logs.
Regards,
Rene
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)