1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.PORTS.MIPS

  • [[email protected]: Give back the package ns3 on mipsel (sid

    From Aurelien Jarno@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jan 25 11:00:01 2020
    Hi MIPS porters,

    Martin Quinson has issues to get ns3 built on mipsel (see below). We
    discussed that briefly on #debian-buildd and a rebuild doesn't help as
    the issue is actually the 2GB virtual address space limit, which is not
    enough for as.

    Martin already tried on the porterbox to use the
    -Wl,--reduce-memory-overheads and -Wl,--no-keep-memory options, but it
    doesn't help.

    Can someone please have a look at the issue and provide him with a
    patch?

    Thanks,
    Aurelien


    ----- Forwarded message from Martin Quinson <[email protected]> -----

    From: Martin Quinson <[email protected]>
    To: [email protected]
    Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:59:06 +0100
    Subject: Give back the package ns3 on mipsel (sid)
    Message-ID: <20200124095906.GQ6611@cafuron>

    Hello,

    The last build of my package ran out of memory on mipsel, and I'd like
    to give it another try, please. The thing is that this upload fixes 2
    RC bugs that justify the removal of my package.

    https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ns3

    Please tell me if such an email is not the most convinient for you. I
    was wondering whether I should upload a new version of the package (I
    do have some small cleanups waiting) to trigger the rebuild, but that
    would reset the delay for migrating to testing (and cancel the ongoing removal).

    Thanks for your helpful work,
    Mt.

    --
    Ce triste monde tragique ne vise plus la libert� d'expression,
    mais bien plut�t la libert� d'�tre con.



    ----- End forwarded message -----

    --
    Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B [email protected] http://www.aurel32.net

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEUryGlb40+QrX1Ay4E4jA+JnoM2sFAl4sEB8ACgkQE4jA+Jno M2uDAA//asGZjNefSc1JH8jhzaP0H2m/YwqZ+D03sEYQIXOwPlnaAC1BPwxyKzFN UsXzv+rz+4ffjPbJ9ET3sNnw7NpSJPU/9VhKo92AApuxzPxRQ24cmevXXTUJEQJT SjQtKRBwHbLdktL1UNQ+X+9x0U0E/CruQYBLzpyHCEEY15/87we9UsLnWQxZHpQC 0fHGzbHb+BNH5lMpsrnY2y3Dv8Wh72GgajcS+o8deiHatSRPs0XRNb+ZEgT/LWdH ap/ls55BwD8UOOUCk18yt49cpjpbJppls9X1pb4TvLfoQXh/Wa+24IqgJBy5SQoU BTBNN1gLrTliGXho0QhR7jADgxt+c8ityXyaelP71bmn/aoUdkH8R+Mbjc96F6wA kNkVi5ZNx8gbkVUzM6IOtBoNvtsnr4Sz69rc9QId9ACfctfEpRj0Sru24VJWb50W 0IBTdaDeNgpu6mCQesQDiZPfTs0zA3v5JWermCU+kk39wOm+uGy4hO5NP7bKsrkn C5c1KPkHh6Rc+tIugUyl/hQAjLFkvQY7LwZ9REHKuvugpnkLe3PSX2NR3TfECRLn StkcUdtE7phYlCXJ7DBBfJ1K66abA0CWWg6f4IxHEpE4vna4
  • From Martin Quinson@21:1/5 to Aurelien Jarno on Sun Jan 26 12:30:02 2020
    Hello,

    My current attempt to reduce the memory consumption is in the git on
    salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ns3/

    In addition to the two flags that Aurelien advised, I removed the -g
    flags to kill the debug symbols. But that's still not sufficient
    (tested on the porterbox).

    I'd like to add that ns3 has two stupid RC bugs related to python2
    that are fixed with this upload. I have tested all the ideas that I
    had, and I'm really hopping that you'll find a solution to help me.

    Thanks in advance,
    Mt

    On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 10:53:37AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
    Hi MIPS porters,

    Martin Quinson has issues to get ns3 built on mipsel (see below). We discussed that briefly on #debian-buildd and a rebuild doesn't help as
    the issue is actually the 2GB virtual address space limit, which is not enough for as.

    Martin already tried on the porterbox to use the -Wl,--reduce-memory-overheads and -Wl,--no-keep-memory options, but it doesn't help.

    Can someone please have a look at the issue and provide him with a
    patch?

    Thanks,
    Aurelien


    ----- Forwarded message from Martin Quinson <[email protected]> -----

    From: Martin Quinson <[email protected]>
    To: [email protected]
    Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:59:06 +0100
    Subject: Give back the package ns3 on mipsel (sid)
    Message-ID: <20200124095906.GQ6611@cafuron>

    Hello,

    The last build of my package ran out of memory on mipsel, and I'd like
    to give it another try, please. The thing is that this upload fixes 2
    RC bugs that justify the removal of my package.

    https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ns3

    Please tell me if such an email is not the most convinient for you. I
    was wondering whether I should upload a new version of the package (I
    do have some small cleanups waiting) to trigger the rebuild, but that
    would reset the delay for migrating to testing (and cancel the ongoing removal).

    Thanks for your helpful work,
    Mt.

    --
    Ce triste monde tragique ne vise plus la libert� d'expression,
    mais bien plut�t la libert� d'�tre con.



    ----- End forwarded message -----

    --
    Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B [email protected] http://www.aurel32.net



    --
    You have a problem and decide to use git.
    Now you have a forest of subtly incompatible solutions.

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCAAdFiEET76cTupS7xPVQWYSmL2XJE9zvqcFAl4tdEsACgkQmL2XJE9z vqcpyQ/7Bl0h2Q6mn2mIDe+S5pxxDk9eBejkdQkb5slaGScGkvKiQSzld2QDOE+a ziP99r2b2mCE6zabBiNnFqBHrfUR1SBn998sVeZCv5QwTZRYAvO7rBIiMnbTX+Sj EESmNy+p7cnCjjrAxWZAZgU9LQ6zP38jrhhgjRFqK7PUaBKz/MEJNINDsZ8B69XB 52kpBEx2nSSDKDX6lpM6m7DsCz1eaM9xI+KE6BR7sIS6zNARdTJAY+n6NKKsVP05 H1B+QljmqkczI6yGqR445qFaRGdpy0V+eWeEy83JwecBqhMOvrxB25CL/NEm46/e R7A1jDFwUF2HoouIDYaOkwX9m63H3zWj9tWGBk+OjexpJ27ZTtQg0RFh/zGDMk9B nZgAIdWji187oxJq45akL8TwPYlgabVHYSKbhUSbxWHPvnbOO6YyB/IlTiPtYntg YrV2dOAznP+dZDui0n0Y2cNj4uUQxKhkwna0LkcUjqtoUt+Xwlo++P+7dHZe7CpS 5q1MK6afBZGYjSafia5NoRYnsZXTOXj4aic2ssFfQBPpNfr1X1rfw+B9J2fvXIZG G0UNQ0SMYlFB0l513OFccKL8OMQA4x65OH7YICqLd3ebyRqP7d6kFya9O7e467km U3syO2h4oaR/NzO3mYEmPop5ua0Lu/pCyuIlrLQPLH64pbYw5LA=
    =hYUW
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/