1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.MAINT.BOOT

  • d-i-n-i vs. riscv64

    From Cyril Brulebois@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 28 02:30:02 2024
    Hello Aurélien,

    Let's pretend I know nothing about riscv64… I see you added support for
    it in debian-installer (thanks!) and the resulting images tarball
    includes netboot stuff, so I've staged the addition of a riscv64 package
    on the d-i-n-i side:
    https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer-netboot-images/-/commit/eec4e7add8cd0aac06eb29e54fcf161c1539e39c
    https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer-netboot-images/-/commit/d9d653ccc36c6e8499cb37ae016cee5274bc6497

    I just wanted to make sure that makes sense before throwing the updated
    package in NEW's direction (we have the 12→13 bump already anyway…).

    Thanks already!


    Cheers,
    --
    Cyril Brulebois ([email protected]) <https://debamax.com/>
    D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEtg6/KYRFPHDXTPR4/5FK8MKzVSAFAmdvU8gACgkQ/5FK8MKz VSCCeBAAs79/4z5hFVNLTse4kl0RsQfprHnJxLNtjRjXrWoJtpX7L6Yaklu1xn+s oEfz2AWRD5/w+CQb+aBSZJESOyi/dL+XC81ATuUiTwwD2H/pmspYqJXZ+hmly+PP 4EoORMtp4+5+/YaYa4lqwM8HIk8H9H/DYRdnZTCoSsfUFTn0NL4oOAg3Uo6Jxcn4 R1rzJUJcztU1+/2l5QDOLprWYEly3NNudHKrvmuDrzg01DgwlKjLLcfJ4g1B15ue //3/j9GJyN48Ki1D4u2Q0ZrY6zNpJnNfWd0QhVpV5+udWeinEyhCSl+NT5eBhFWv atD0oQDrIb88nNw+oyH/Uj1J52bEHpeTr0gNt2HAtwPGca1H/GN9M+YlTOBqlfx3 U6XQa4v2san3PT/ikWmGxOre0Gw4nzw3q4F+UP8ULPK5AabNadYuLGlwhJJiFvgN OMYHEOLtNuxi0V21IM7NFCczNEq+8B9rBLlkEamEFTF759klmolqq6CnAP0G3Eau oEuZiNFdApYqjg/hwohY+++SqjMzFPxNRgJu7BN+hdmhz/N1+85zSrS/MpLPrgo6 uqTl6g1EKrGvP7DhwHJcTUIzpk/oqOuNHksve7fRD2ck5hsLmuqUSTH8Gjz97ulY PYnDPIRsnyJ5KUMQ/Je6eW/oLAG3qMqukAIOQg8PoQVp4nzdxJ0=
    =DoG1
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    *
  • From Aurelien Jarno@21:1/5 to Cyril Brulebois on Sat Dec 28 12:10:01 2024
    Hi Cyril,

    On 2024-12-28 02:26, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
    Hello Aurélien,

    Let's pretend I know nothing about riscv64… I see you added support for
    it in debian-installer (thanks!) and the resulting images tarball
    includes netboot stuff, so I've staged the addition of a riscv64 package
    on the d-i-n-i side:
    https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer-netboot-images/-/commit/eec4e7add8cd0aac06eb29e54fcf161c1539e39c
    https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer-netboot-images/-/commit/d9d653ccc36c6e8499cb37ae016cee5274bc6497

    Thanks for doing that. I do not have time to test that today, but looks
    good, riscv64 should not be different than other architectures.

    I just wanted to make sure that makes sense before throwing the updated package in NEW's direction (we have the 12→13 bump already anyway…).

    Yes, I confirm it makes sense.

    Cheers
    Aurelien

    --
    Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B [email protected] http://aurel32.net

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEUryGlb40+QrX1Ay4E4jA+JnoM2sFAmdv2jAACgkQE4jA+Jno M2vvCA/7BcJ8zheww+4o5zzGxi89S7DuoO0hzd22OSF3Q4zwVlBA78Hc2vGzdzb7 NDs6DeBCmxFNsLTf8UyU5Ya7Rot0qevdmNCUV7QPuvoOooHtR0312iTEiNZnvo2w Okb1ffgLd4bjbNH6glkDwLrW1PTXqLbioEjvrNyrKCE+Y2ZikbqgXYbCsqbRwpn8 w+68lysBIXuvTlpQq6xixXHDcIgrmMPkbQxBjH3+kBbjrObzkotF0Qtr/QBVaZ+7 xasN5Pvn3FrRz6DI5jfwdJB2E0mf9IkPUPF2JfgzOZw0E2HxVIw9XJzQI5duSVLx 5IEZu/ux0WHHXXca7Hg7uwvUk74bu8gFVbwZ3/P3ZvCoGp70kG3CYlQohK+WtRdl mMB/avPU1dIsWSGmmprtiqQZmrkPZH/79S5ji7g/AZ3ra1yrMIyOcd3CD/TXlH7v 2+PugBpFlGZrS/gCksMbyo/k+zUVGs9tqN3AkniUsTVADUyDrCn7BsHNwSbV9Ndr kleCOP05wZYMzr9f4vpUVV6Tq3up28M+8EHK+UYIyW6JDjUVmwYrCyLKEfmtfoiW YqpTWMFY68cCWEJGLIOFGDn8E7VJevvW3bzZI4f/WOrwwDW/xnllD5IM9Ym3RB6B nWy6KnzDuEnrTA+lsQ6ExiJvZQliJytXkkewGTr2mVAFlP797WQ=
    =1qD0
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet
  • From Cyril Brulebois@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 28 16:20:01 2024
    Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> (2024-12-28):
    Thanks for doing that. I do not have time to test that today, but looks
    good, riscv64 should not be different than other architectures.
    […]
    Yes, I confirm it makes sense.

    Alright, the package built fine after the latest dinstall run (which put
    the needed files into place), and it's on its way to NEW.

    Thanks for the quick answer (and also on the debian-cd front).


    Cheers,
    --
    Cyril Brulebois ([email protected]) <https://debamax.com/>
    D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEtg6/KYRFPHDXTPR4/5FK8MKzVSAFAmdwFVwACgkQ/5FK8MKz VSD52g/+MXs+APwhUdJZHGB3kANgyVkh6vHBaBZoZX6JMkn8oLoRkE44HROh0RGn UJ3RW8Y2DyNzJo4ST8xFt6RnPWZzEGwYSiUoaEcWhJA1JyfqCvH8xwffnqDK6o45 p2eOGELI1lMb1FnKAcPiuLxOMfcJqh6lOk9oRcxXi72RUWufsZe140pEjepGyMMu pYa80J/J4c8vU0NN5NUb0JD+/BvfArN2ZhgoHinOw0wuBxm9ED+xuIUeCMRr/vgf wBykP7f7ACV6a2DtsMyykA8W9sB6rahf7TSbAZd/R0aCiaSCWdha8ifmfB2IAbF6 JER0Nm+weJQV5x1pDoEsnQkD1UK48rHmotaNd4HZCFih5byPI0x1oBbunx5L4OI/ MAxHFu9idbcRdRa+D9SNcaTQY05VvN9VtevNXzqLGH4LQ5EnjNkF88sduH8Jeee1 fggRAkOeFVtV40tvGvNssM2U//41xqVqLZMOQ1/uZfEA48eQN7xASXcQs4MMHInQ SeelGWndI5v69XsVUYk+jHz9VjDh3G/n/MhuYQL6++MbIHUDyCYpzLGl5E4vx6eY CgpUxufJ0gRaXG9hxsVUg9wuxj2hFH7wqwG+aghTDXMpu3fC2MQ4YB6oE1xO4kSC 3uKfPFaHw9t74yc9i5kVBx4i/v6xgIsRr+/Y/ZOaCgJ9XB7cQb0=
    =K6lw
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    *