changed salsa-ci configuration for flash-kernel
From
Vagrant Cascadian@21:1/5 to
All on Mon Nov 20 03:00:01 2023
The default salsa-ci pipeline for installer-team projects has always
failed for flash-kernel, probably because flash-kernel builds no
arch:amd64 packages.
I recently merged a salsa-ci configuration from josch and switched
flash-kernel to use a a salsa-ci pipeline that used arm64 runners
instead, so that the pipelines could actually succeed.
Now I have a bunch of green checkmarks for flash-kernel, yay!
I do not know what, if anything, might be missing from this compared to
the usual salsa-ci jobs for installer projects, so I figured it was
worth mentioning here.
Holler if this change broke anything!
live well,
vagrant
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iHQEARYKAB0WIQRlgHNhO/zFx+LkXUXcUY/If5cWqgUCZVq5xgAKCRDcUY/If5cW qp2qAPi0EOpT7Ch/qxucyenTIQJj9hOA9/B/uhcxKcA7ARBlAQCT92bV0CPRfDCN iA8Y2/nJq7ZUQtS34ypE5xqD0CT7DA==
=p6Oh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)