Hi,
raph <
[email protected]> (2023-02-26):
Cyril Brulebois writes:
Are you sure that was about the driver (kernel module) rather than
about firmware?
H,, look this is beyond my current knowledge to answer.
Thanks for the logs, that seems to be a *module* issue rather than a
firmware issue, and your subject (about wl) seems absolutely on point.
The relevant part of the installer's syslog is:
Feb 26 08:50:50 kernel: [ 28.095391] b43-phy0: Broadcom 4360 WLAN found (core revision 42)
Feb 26 08:50:50 kernel: [ 28.095805] b43-phy0 ERROR: FOUND UNSUPPORTED PHY (Analog 12, Type 11 (AC), Revision 1)
Feb 26 08:50:50 kernel: [ 28.095810] b43: probe of bcma0:1 failed with error -95
Feb 26 08:50:50 kernel: [ 28.095839] Broadcom 43xx driver loaded [ Features: PNLS ]
after a few lines about bcma-pci-bridge.
So your board is definitely detected, there's a module that tries to do something with it, but fails…
A few month ago, I tried to move this machine to testing. But like with
a previous debian install, when moving to testing the network stopped working. I do not know if this is important / related or not.
Tell me I can do anything else to help.
This machine is ok with buster, but I can back it up and try a complete install when/if needed to contribute.
All files are super useful. The installer logs (meaning bookworm kernel)
are about bcma/b43. Those don't appear in your list of buster modules,
which contains “wl” instead. A quick search on bcma and wl suggests that they might fight each other, at least in some kernel versions:
https://askubuntu.com/questions/592191/error-during-startup-b43-phy0-unsupported-phy
Checking the contents of current nic-wireless-modules udebs, we do ship bcma.ko, but not wl.ko, so that's not about a competition between both
modules (at least in the installer context).
Now, looking at kernel sources, I'm not seeing any broadcom-wl driver in mainline. Did you install a specific module on your buster system to get wireless up and running?
I'm seeing a broadcom-sta source package that builds broadcom-sta-dkms
and broadcom-sta-source, I suppose that's what you might be using on
buster, after a successful wired install, maybe? At least your board
(4360) is listed in its description.
It's a binary-only driver so that's not something we include in the
installer, and if the above analysis is correct, I'm not sure we can do anything about it. :(
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (
[email protected]) <
https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEtg6/KYRFPHDXTPR4/5FK8MKzVSAFAmP7nXQACgkQ/5FK8MKz VSBtaA/8CtD/mVb7Pfk7NB0S96zcY5JCUIHPT0uVYNyTeXmaJ8+Y7j6pAbsvtQmC TtRzO/qg2At1i0FJh3PyXgn1UwfKmn/dMHT2EbNc0qak2bk+TLgN/kBsAO5aukTs KZg36hhD/uLsTBrTPH46W57qaYU769AvNUgDs3sSp88ytJ4z9IpTxPjyUWiE4Euv ahyffNK/j/70nU8qCoNF7Q2BEdrnIWwQxtzWaWZRZl9wUpKX1esAKt561egMgOXZ 2egfIjbg+UKiSLiA+gHDNo3PKvuuxcYaE4fvkWOYx1rL8RvO4A0jOJNktGS2LEch Bw8AUDH+Avn/qWmxDu1KO7aYF/Mz1/n+SI4DbG1vs1dqc618hgae9J5VFfSq8rwh lkywgY+1U/enwcYTsf9Jv3F5YVJ738m0h8ha2nDvTr0v+mWX5Y/Q9OWP/UFKRPgZ VZwaMcmD3eU5Wa/LeAVXOuTNtwgltrj2czxfGh6UNPnLeBqyyLCXVdIrIfIpp5ul i/XGW7h7R+K5xUHVKHD+c0WCHlflA8gFBPByIhnXvMJ83ZNeNqtow8/bk5NlF7pl fkt4wQeiMyeZ6JSldzQfT4Cm5ActAPnAfveKx0t1j2Sgdy0qEYz5YvbxCqTPtu2V 9bLTG82mUKBvi/BjqDQ9glFHXmeKVhCjCkVIfVB+xsYEyRwz1AM=
=26xe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
*