• Fwd: Updating Flask and Werkzeug to 3.1.x?

    From Carsten Schoenert@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 25 10:40:01 2024
    Hrhr, I need to forward my answer to Thomas to the Debian Python Team as
    even in my initial email I mixed up the correct email address from the
    DPT. Sorry. :-(


    -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
    Betreff: Re: Updating Flask and Werkzeug to 3.1.x?
    Datum: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:37:10 +0100
    Von: Carsten Schoenert <[email protected]>
    An: Thomas Goirand <[email protected]>, Debian Python Team <[email protected]>

    Hello Thomas,

    Am 23.11.24 um 13:36 schrieb Thomas Goirand:
    ...
    Hi Carsten,

    Thanks for your work, and thanks for letting us know what you intend to
    do regarding these packages.

    Uploading to experimental and checking for the excuse page for any autopkgtest regression is the correct workflow. You do not need my
    approval to do so. Please go ahead, and thanks in advance for your contribution: that's much appreciated, especially for such high profile packages.

    thanks for confirming my point of view. We did the same one yer ago and
    it worked well that way.
    But I wanted to ask you somehow as you are currently listed in the
    Uploaders field.

    I've done the uploads of Werkzeug and also Flask yesterday and at least
    for python-werkzeug it looks promising I'd say. No broken tests until
    now. Fingers crossed!

    https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=1&package=python-werkzeug

    The package flask will need some more time so the autopkgtests can get
    executed against 3.1.3-1.

    https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=1&package=flask

    --
    Regards
    Carsten

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carsten Schoenert@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 29 08:40:01 2024
    Hi Thomas and DPT,

    this update went (a bit unexpected :-) ) very well! But yeah, now
    Werkzeug and also Flask are up to date in unstable/testing! Not one
    single package needed any additional work.

    Am 25.11.24 um 10:39 schrieb Carsten Schoenert:
    Hrhr, I need to forward my answer to Thomas to the Debian Python Team as
    even in my initial email I mixed up the correct email address from the
    DPT. Sorry. :-(

    ...

    Hello Thomas,

    Am 23.11.24 um 13:36 schrieb Thomas Goirand:
    ...
    Hi Carsten,

    Thanks for your work, and thanks for letting us know what you intend to
    do regarding these packages.

    Uploading to experimental and checking for the excuse page for any
    autopkgtest regression is the correct workflow. You do not need my
    approval to do so. Please go ahead, and thanks in advance for your
    contribution: that's much appreciated, especially for such high profile
    packages.

    thanks for confirming my point of view. We did the same one yer ago and
    it worked well that way.
    But I wanted to ask you somehow as you are currently listed in the
    Uploaders field.

    I've done the uploads of Werkzeug and also Flask yesterday and at least
    for python-werkzeug it looks promising I'd say. No broken tests until
    now. Fingers crossed!

    https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=1&package=python-werkzeug

    The package flask will need some more time so the autopkgtests can get executed against 3.1.3-1.

    https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=1&package=flask


    --
    Regards
    Carsten

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)